Morphing Structures in the Venus Flytrap

  • Vladislav S. Markin
  • Alexander G. Volkov


Venus flytrap is a marvelous plant that intrigued scientists since times of Charles Darwin. This carnivorous plant is capable of very fast movements to catch insects. Mechanism of this movement was debated for a long time. Here, the most recent Hydroelastic Curvature Model is presented. In this model the upper leaf of the Venus flytrap is visualized as a thin, weakly curved elastic shell with principal natural curvatures that depend on the hydrostatic state of the two surface layers of cell, where different hydrostatic pressures are maintained. Unequal expansion of individual layers A and B results in bending of the leaf, and it was described in terms of bending elasticity. The external triggers, either mechanical or electrical, result in the opening of pores connecting these layers; water then rushes from the upper layer to the lower layer, and the bilayer couple quickly changes its curvature from convex to concave and the trap closes. Equations describing this movement were derived and verified with experimental data. The whole hunting cycle from catching the fly through tightening, through digestion, and through reopening the trap was described.


Mechanical Stimulation Sensory Memory Carnivorous Plant Spontaneous Curvature Venus Flytrap 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was supported by the grant from the U.S. Army Research Office.


  1. Affolter JM, Olivo RF (1975) Action potentials in Venus’s-flytraps: long-term observations following the capture of prey. Am Midl Nat 93:443–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beilby MJ, Bisson MA, Shepherd VA (2006) Electrophysiology of turgor regulation in charophyte cells. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology—theory and methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benolken RM, Jacobson SL (1970) Response properties of a sensory hair excised from Venus’s flytrap. J Gen Physiol 56:64–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bobji MS (2005) Springing the trap. J Biosci 30:143–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown WH (1916) The mechanism of movement and the duration of the effect of stimulation in the leaves of Dionaea. Amer J Bot 3:68–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown WH, Sharp LW (1910) The closing response in Dionaea. Bot Gaz 49(1910):290–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buchen B, Hensel D, Sievers A (1983) Polarity in mechanoreceptor cells of trigger hairs of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 158:458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burdon-Sanderson J (1873) Note on the electrical phenomena, which accompany stimulation of the leaf of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Phil Proc R Soc Lond 21:495–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burdon-Sanderson J, Page FJM (1876) On the mechanical effects and on the electrical disturbance consequent on excitation of the leaf of Dionaea muscipula. Philos Proc R Soc Lond 25:411–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darwin C (1875) Insectivorous plants. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Candolle CP (1876) Sur la structure et les mouvements des feuilles du Dionaea muscipula. Arch Sci Phys Nat 55:400–431Google Scholar
  12. Detmers FJM, De Groot BL, Mueller EM, Hinton A, Konings IBM, Sze M, Flitsch SL, Grubmueller H, Deen PMT (2006) Quaternary ammonium compounds as water channel blockers: specificity, potency, and site of action. J Biol Chem 281:14207–14214PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiPalma JR, McMichael R, DiPalma M (1966) Touch receptor of Venus flytrap, Dionaea muscipula. Science 152:539–540PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Drever JI (1997) The geochemistry of natural waters: surface and groundwater environments. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  15. Fagerberg WR, Allain D (1991) A quantitative study of tissue dynamics during closure in the traps of Venus’s flytrap Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Amer J Bot 78:647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fagerberg WR, Howe DG (1996) A quantitative study of tissue dynamics in Venus’s flytrap Dionaea muscipula (Droseraceae) II. Trap reopening. Amer J Bot 83:836–842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forterre Y, Skothelm JM, Dumals J, Mahadevan L (2005) How the Venus flytrap snaps. Nature 433:421–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hill BS, Findlay GP (1981) The power of movement in plants: the role of osmotic machines. Q Rev Biophys 14:173–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hodick D, Sievers A (1988) The action potential of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Planta 174:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hodick D, Sievers A (1989) The influence of Ca2+ on the action potential in mesophyll cells of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Protoplasma 133:83–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jacobson SL (1965) Receptor response in Venus’s flytrap. J Gen Physiol 49:117–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacobson SL (1974) The effect of ionic environment on the response of the sensory hair of Venus’s flytrap. Can J Bot 52:1293–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaffe MJ (1973) The role of ATP in mechanically stimulated rapid closure of the Venus’s flytrap. Plant Physiol 51:17–18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krol E, Dziubinska H, Stolarz M, Trebacz K (2006) Effects of ion channel inhibitors on cold- and electrically-induced action potentials in Dionaea muscipula. Biol Plantarum 50:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ksenzhek OS, Volkov AG (1998) Plant energetics. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  26. Lichtner FT, Williams SE (1977) Prey capture and factors controlling trap narrowing in Dionaea (Doseraceae). Am J Bot 64:881–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lim HWG, Wortis M, Mukhopadhyay R (2002) Stomatocyte-discocyte-echinocyte sequence of the human red blood cell: evidence for the bilayer-couple hypothesis from membrane mechanics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16766–16769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lloyd FE (1942) The carnivorous plants. Ronald, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Markin VS, Albanesi JP (2002) Membrane fusion: stalk model revisited. Biophys J 82:693–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markin VS, Volkov AG, Jovanov E (2008) Active movements in plants: mechanism of trap closure by Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Plant Signal Behav 3:778–783PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maurel C (1997) Aquaporins and water permeability of plant membranes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:399–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maurel C, Chrispeels MJ (2001) Aquaporins. A molecular entry into plant water relations. Plant Physiol 125:135–138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McGowan AMR, Washburn AE, Horta LG, Bryant RG, Cox DE, Siochi EJ, Padula SL, Holloway NM (2002) Recent results from NASA’s morphing project, smart structures and materials. In: Proceedings of SPIE—International Society for Optical Engineering (USA), San Diego, CA, vol 4698, doi: 10.1117/12.475056
  34. Mozingo HN, Klein P, Zeevi Y, Lewis ER (1970) Venus’s flytrap observations by scanning electron microscopy. Amer J Bot 57:593–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Munk H (1876) Die electrischen und Bewegungserscheinungen am Blatte der Dionaeae muscipula. Arch Anat Physiol Wiss Med pp 30–203Google Scholar
  36. Nayak TK, Sikdar SK (2007) Time-dependent molecular memory in single voltage-gated sodium channel. J Membr Biol 219:19–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nelson DL, Cox MM (2005) Lehninger principles of biochemistry, 4th edn. Freeman, New York, pp 58–59Google Scholar
  38. Pavlovič A, Demko V, Hudak J (2010) Trap closure and prey retention in Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula) temporarily reduces photosynthesis and stimulates respiration. Ann Bot 105:37–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pavlovič A, Slovakova L, Pandolfi C, Mancuso S (2011) On the mechanism underlying photosynthetic limitation upon trigger hair irritation in the carnivorous plant Venus flytrap (Dionaea muscipula Ellis). J Exp Bot 62:1991–2000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qi Z, Chi S, Su X, Naruse K, Sokabe M (2005) Activation of a mechanosensitive BK channel by membrane stress created with amphipaths. Mol Membr Biol 22:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rea PA (1983) The dynamics of H+ efflux from the trap lobes of Dionaea muscipula Ellis (Venus’s flytrap). Plant, Cell Environ 6:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rea PA (1984) Evidence for the H+ -co-transport of D-alanine by the digestive glands of Dionaea muscipula Ellis. Plant, Cell Environ 7:363–366Google Scholar
  43. Savage DF, Stroud RM (2007) Structural basis of aquaporin inhibition by mercury. J Mol Biol 368:607–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scala J, Iott K, Schwab DW, Semersky FE (1969) Digestive secretion of Dionaea muscipula (Venus’s-Flytrap). Plant Physiol 44:367–371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sheetz MP, Singer SJ (1974) Biological membranes as bilayer couples. A molecular mechanism of drug-erythrocyte interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:4457–4461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimmen T (2006) Electrophysiology in mechanosensing and wounding response. In: Volkov AG (ed) Plant electrophysiology—theory and methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sibaoka T (1969) Physiology of rapid movements in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 20:165–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stuhlman O, Darden E (1950) The action potential obtained from Venus’s flytrap. Science 111:491–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tamiya T, Miyazaki T, Ishikawa H, Iriguchi N, Maki T, Matsumoto JJ, Tsuchiya T (1988) Movement of water in conjunction with plant movement visualized by NMR imaging. J Biochem 104:5–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyerman SD, Niemietz CM, Bramley H (2002) Plant aquaporins: multifunctional water and solute channels with expanding roles. Plant, Cell Environ 25:173–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Volkov AG (ed) (2006a) Plant electrophysiology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  52. Volkov AG (2006b) Electrophysiology and phototropism. In: Balushka F, Manusco S, Volkman D (eds) Communication in plants. Neuronal aspects of plant life. Springer, Berlin, pp 351–367Google Scholar
  53. Volkov AG, Deamer DW, Tanelian DL, Markin VS (1998) Liquid interfaces in chemistry and biology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Jovanov E (2007) Closing of Venus flytrap by electrical stimulation of motor cells. Plant Signal Behav 2:139–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Volkov AG, Adesina T, Markin VS, Jovanov E (2008a) Kinetics and mechanism of Dionaea muscipula trap closing. Plant Physiol 146:694–702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Adesina T, Markin VS, Jovanov E (2008b) Plant electrical memory. Plant Signal Behav 3:490–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Volkov AG, Coopwood KJ, Markin VS (2008c) Inhibition of the Dionaea muscipula Ellis trap closure by ion and water channels blockers and uncouplers. Plant Sci 175:642–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Baldwin A, Markin VS (2009a) Electrical memory in Venus flytrap. Bioelectrochemistry 75:142–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Volkov AG, Carrell H, Markin VS (2009b) Biologically closed electrical circuits in Venus flytrap. Plant Physiol 149:1661–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Volkov AG, Pinnock MR, Lowe DC, Gay MS, Markin VS (2011) Complete hunting cycle of Dionaea muscipula: Consecutive steps and their electrical properties. J Plant Physiol 168:109–120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams ME, Mozingo HN (1971) The fine structure of the trigger hair in Venus’s flytrap. Amer J Botany 58:532–539Google Scholar
  62. Williams SE, Bennet AB (1982) Leaf closure in the Venus flytrap: an acid growth response. Science 218:1120–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang R, Lenaghan SC, Zhang M, Xia L (2010) A mathematical model on the closing and opening mechanism for Venus flytrap. Plant Signal Behav 5:968–978PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Zonia L, Munnik T (2007) Life under pressure: hydrostatic pressure in cell growth and function. Trends Plant Sci 12:90–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologyUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallasUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryOakwood UniversityHuntsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations