Advertisement

Water Budget

  • Robert Maliva
  • Thomas Missimer
Chapter
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

A quantitative understanding of aquifer water budgets is critical for effective, long-term water management. Water budgets can be directly calculated assuming that sufficient data are available. However, water budgets are now much more commonly implicitly evaluated as part of numerical surface-water and groundwater models or integrated surface-water/groundwater models. Nevertheless, development of accurate conceptual models, and in turn, numerical models of hydrologic systems requires knowledge of the main components of their water budgets and their magnitudes.

Keywords

Water Budget Recharge Rate Unconfined Aquifer Semiarid Region Arid Land 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alley, W. M. (2006). Tracking U.S. groundwater reserves for the future. Environment, 48(3), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alley, W. M., Reilly, T. E., & Franke, O. L. (1999). Sustainability of ground‐water resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186.Google Scholar
  3. Balleau, W. P. (1988). Water approximation and transfer in a general hydrogeologic system. Natural Resources Journal, 29(2), 269–291.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdon, D. J. (1977). Flow of fossil groundwater. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 10, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouwer, H. (1978). Groundwater hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Bredehoeft, J. D. (2002). The water budget myth revisited: Why hydrogeologists model. Ground Water, 40, 340–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bredehoeft, J. D., & Durbin, T. (2009). Ground water development—the time of capture problem. Ground Water, 47(4), 506–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bredehoeft, J. D., Papadopulos, S. S., & Cooper, H. H., Jr. (1982). The water-budget myth: Studies in Geophysics Scientific Basis of Water Resources Management. (pp. 51–57). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  9. Carrillo-Rivera, J. J. (2000). Application of the groundwater-balance equation to indicate interbasin and vertical flow in two semi-arid drainage basins, Mexico. Hydrogeology Basin, 8, 503–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carrillo-Rivera, J. J., Cardona, A., & Edmunds, W. M. (2002). Use of abstraction regime and knowledge of hydrogeological conditions to control high fluoride concentration in abstracted groundwater. Journal of Hydrology, 261, 24–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrillo-Rivera, J. J., Cardona, A., & Moss, D. (1996). Importance of the vertical component of groundwater flow: A hydrogeochemical approach in the valley of San Luis Potosi Mexico. Journal of Hydrology, 186, 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devlin, J. F., & Sophocleous, M. (2005). The persistence of the water budget myth and its relationship to sustainability. Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 549–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houston, J., & Hart, D. (2004). Theoretical head decay in closed basin aquifers: An insight into fossil groundwater and recharge events in the Andes of northern Chile. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 37, 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kalf, F. R. P., & Wooley, D. R. (2005). Application and methodology for determining sustainable yield in groundwater systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 295–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kendy, E. (2003). The false promises of sustainable pumping rates. Ground Water, 41, 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lohman, S. W. (1979). Ground-water hydraulics. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 708.Google Scholar
  17. Maliva, R. G., & Hopfensperger, K. P. (2007). Impacts of residential development on humid tropical freshwater resources: Southwest Florida experience. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 43, 1540–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxey, G. B. (1968). Hydrogeology of desert basins. Hydrogeology Journal, 6(5), 10–22.Google Scholar
  19. Nichols, W. D. (1994). Groundwater discharge by phreatophyte shrubs in the Great Basin as related to depth to groundwater. Water Resources Research, 30, 3265–3274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pattison, R. R., D’Antonio, C. M., Dudley, T. L., Allander, K. K., & Rice, B. (2011). Early impacts of biological control on canopy cover and water use of the invasive saltcedar tree (Tamarix spp.) in western Nevada. Physiological Ecology, 165, 605–616.Google Scholar
  21. Seiler, K.-P., Gu, W.-Z. & Stichler, W. (2008). Transient response of groundwater systems to climate changes. In W. Dragoni & B. S. Sukhija (Eds.), Climate change and groundwater (pp. 111–119). Geological Society of London Special Publications No. 288.Google Scholar
  22. Sophocleous, M. (2002). Interactions between groundwater and surface water: The state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stewart, E. H., & Mills, W. C. (1967). Effect of depth to water table and plant density on evapotranspiration rate in Southern Florida. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 10, 746–747.Google Scholar
  24. Theis, C. V. (1940). The source of water derived from wells. Essential factors controlling the response of an aquifer to development. Civil Engineering, 10, 277–280.Google Scholar
  25. Walton, W. C. (2011). Aquifer system response time and groundwater supply management. Ground Water, 49, 126–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Maliva
    • 1
  • Thomas Missimer
    • 2
  1. 1.Schlumberger Water ServicesFort MyersUSA
  2. 2. Water Desalination and Reuse CenterKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyThuwalSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations