Abstract
Numerical modeling has become an integral component of most water-resources investigations. The primary objective of groundwater modeling is the prediction of aquifer responses to current and future groundwater use and other hydrologic changes. An additional benefit of groundwater modeling is that it can provide insights on the properties of hydrologic systems through the calibration process. Two basic types of modeling have wide applications for groundwater resources modeling: flow and solute transport. Groundwater flow models simulate the hydraulic behavior of the aquifer such as the flow of water, changes in volume of water in storage, and changes in aquifer water levels or heads (pressure). Solute-transport models simulate the fate and transport of dissolved constituents in groundwater, which include salts and contaminants. Additional common types of modeling include heat-flow and integrated surface water-groundwater interactions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, M. P., & Woessner, M. W. (1992). Applied groundwater modeling, simulation of flow and advective transport. San Diego: Academic Press.
Bredehoeft, J. (2005). The conceptualization model problem—surprise? Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 37–46.
Chung, H.-M., Kim, N.-W., Lee, J., & Sophocleous, M. (2010). Assessing distributed groundwater recharge using integrated surface water-groundwater modeling. Hydrogeology Journal, 18, 1253–1264.
DHI Software (2007). MIKE SHE uses manual (Vol. 1). User Guide.
Diersch H. J. (1998). FEFLOW: Interactive, graphics-based finite-element simulation system for modeling groundwater flow, contaminant mass and heat transport processes. In Getting started; user’s manual; reference manual, version 4.6. Berlin, Germany; WASY, Institute for Water Resources Planning and System Research Ltd.
Doherty, J. (2005). PEST: model-independent parameter estimation (5th ed.). Brisbane, Australia: Watermark Numerical Computing.
Domenico, P. A., & Schwartz, F. W. (1998). Physical and chemical hydrogeology (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Fetter, C. W. (2001). Applied hydrogeology (4th ed.). New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall.
Guo, W., & Langevin, C. D. (2002). User’s guide to SEAWAT: A computer program for simulation of three-dimensional variable-density ground-water flow. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report, 01-434.
Harbaugh, A. W. (2005). MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological survey modular ground-water model–the ground-water flow process. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, 6-A16
Hemker, C. J., & de Boer, R. G. (2009). MicroFem (Version 4.10.02).
Herczeg, A. L., & Leaney, F. W. (2011). Review: Environmental tracers in arid-zone hydrology. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(1), 17–30.
Herrmann, R. (2006). ASR well field optimization un unconfined aquifers in the Middle East. In Recharge systems for protecting and enhancing groundwater resources, proceedings of the 5th international symposium on management of aquifer recharge (pp. 109–114). Berlin, Germany, Paris: UNESCO. 11–16 June 2005.
Hill, M. C., & Tiedeman, C. R. (2007). Effective groundwater model calibration: With analysis of data, sensitivities, predictions, and uncertainty. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
Hoffmann, J., Galloway, D. L., & Zebker, H. A. (2003a). Inverse modeling of interbed storage parameters using land subsidence observations. Antelope Valley, California: Water Resources Research, 39(2), 1031. doi:10.1029/2001WR001252,2003.
Hoffmann, J., Leake, S. A., Galloway, D. L., & Wilson, A. M. (2003b). MODFLOW-2000 ground-water model–user guide to the subsidence and aquifer-system compaction (SUB) package. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 03-233.
Hunt, R. J., Doherty, J., & Tonkin, M. J. (2007). Are models too simple? Arguments for Increased Parameterization: Ground Water, 45, 254–262.
Kim, N. W., Chung, I. M., Won, Y. S., & Arnold, J. G. (2008). Development and application of the integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model. Journal of Hydrology, 356, 1–16.
Kipp, K. L., Jr. (1987). HST: A computer code for simulation of heat and solute transport in three-dimensional ground-water flow systems. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 86-4095.
Kipp, K. L., Jr. (1997). Guide to the revised heat and solute transport simulator; HST3D (Version 2). U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4157.
Langevin, C. D., Thorne, D. T., Jr., Dausman, A. M., Sukop, M. C., & Weixing, G. (2008). SEAWAT version 4: a computer program for simulation of multi-species solute and heat transport. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods Book 6, Chapter A22.
Leake, S. A., & Galloway, D. L. (2007). MODFLOW ground-water model—user guide to the subsidence and aquifer-system compaction package (sub-wt) for water-table aquifers. U.S. Geological Survey, Techniques and Methods 6-A23.
Leake, S. A., & Prudic, D. E. (1991). Documentation of a computer program to simulate aquifer-system compaction using the modular finite-difference ground-water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water—Resources Investigations, book 6, chapter. A2.
Leavesley, G. H., Lichty, R. W., Troutman, B. M., & Saindon, L. G. (1983). Precipitation-runoff modeling system: user’s manual. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 83-4238.
Leavesley, G. H., Markstrom, S. L., Viger, R. J., & Hay, L. E. (2005). USGS modular modeling system (MMS)—precipitation-runoff modeling system (PRMS) NMS-PRMS. In V. Singh & D. Frevert (Eds.), Watershed models (pp. 159–177). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Lloyd, J. W. (2004). Do we adequately understand the potential value of our regional aquifers? Proceedings, International Conference on Water Resources in Arid Environments.
Lloyd, J. W. (2007). The difficulties of regional groundwater resources assessments in arid regions. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 32(1C), 35–47.
Maliva, R. G., & Missimer, T. M. (2010). Aquifer storage and recovery and managed aquifer recharge using wells: Planning, hydrogeology, design, and operation. Houston, Schlumberger Water Services, Methods in Water Resources Evaluation Series.
Markstrom, S. L., Niswonger, R. G., Regan, R. S., Prudic, D. E., & Barlow, P. M. (2008). GSFLOW—couple ground-water and surface-water flow model based in the integration of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS) and the Modular Ground-Water Flow Model (MODFLOW-2005). U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-D1.
McDonald, M. G., & Harbaugh, A. W. (1988). A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigation Report 06-A1.
Missimer, T. M., Maliva, R. G., & Guo, W. (2010). Sustainability and the management of water resources in Florida. In F. Bloetcher (Ed.), Sustainable water resources: A compendium of issues and trends (pp. 153–161). Denver: American Water Works Association.
National Research Council (2008). Prospects for managed underground storage of recoverable water. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., & Belitz, M. (1994). Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the Earth Sciences. Science, 263, 641–646.
Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (1999). PHREEQC (Version 2)—A computer program for speciation, batch reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-42549.
Poeter, E. (2007). “All models are wrong, how do we know which are useful?”—looking back at the Darcy lecture tour. Ground Water, 45(4), 390–391.
Poeter, E., & Hill, M. C. (1997). Inverse models: A necessary next step in ground-water modeling. Ground Water, 35(2), 250–260.
Pollock, D. W. (1994). User’s guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT Version 2: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-464.
Prommer, H., Barry, D. A., & Zheng, C. (2003). MODFLOW/MT3DMS based reactive multi-component transport modeling. Ground Water, 41, 347–257.
Radcliff, D., & Šimůnek, J. (2010). Soil physics with HYDRUS: Modeling and applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Sanford, W. (2011). Calibration of models using groundwater age. Hydrogeology Journal, 19, 13–16.
Sophocleous, M. A., Koelliker, J. K., Govindaraju, R. S., Birdie, T., Ramireddygari, S. R., & Perkins, S. P. (1999). Integrated numerical modeling for basin-wide water management: The case of the Rattlesnake Creek basin in south-central Kansas. Journal of Hydrology, 214, 179–196.
Sophocleous, M. A., & Perkins, S. P. (2000). Methodology and application of combined watershed and ground-water models in Kansas. Journal of Hydrology, 236, 185–201.
Voss, C. I., & Provost, A. M. (2002). SUTRA, A model for saturated-unsaturated variable-density ground-water flow with solute or energy transport. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 02-4231.
Zheng, C., & Bennett, G. D. (2002). Applied contaminant transport modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Zheng, C., & Wang, P. P. (1999). MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multi-species model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in ground water systems: Documentation and user’s guide. U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi, report SERDP-99-1.
Zhu, C., & Murphy, W. M. (2000). On radioactive dating of ground water. Ground Water, 38, 802–804.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maliva, R., Missimer, T. (2012). Groundwater Flow and Solute-Transport Modeling. In: Arid Lands Water Evaluation and Management. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29104-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29104-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29103-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29104-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)