Advertisement

Geographic Information Science as a Common Cause for Interdisciplinary Research

  • Thomas Blaschke
  • Josef Strobl
  • Lothar Schrott
  • Robert Marschallinger
  • Franz Neubauer
  • Andreas Koch
  • Euro Beinat
  • Thomas Heistracher
  • Siegfried Reich
  • Michael Leitner
  • Karl Donert
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Geographic Information Science (GIScience) seeks to understand the nature of geographic phenomena and geo-spatial information. It provides theoretical foundations for Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and the rationale for research and development in GIS and their applications. In this article, we analyse the role of GIScience as a common denominator among and between various disciplines, acting as a facilitator for interdisciplinary research. Starting from the development of a coordinated and structured doctoral programme,ten senior university faculty members from different disciplines examine the commonalities of spatial (Because of limited space we focus in this paper on the spatial domain and will only briefly reflect the spatio-temporal complexity) concepts in their respective fields in three interdisciplinary research clusters. Since the educational rationale was published recently, we focus on the role of GIScience in building an interdisciplinary and inter-departmental research alliance and conclude that the university-wide visibility has increased and opens new changes for another ‘spatial turn’.

Keywords

GIScience GIS Interdisciplinary research PhD education Doctoral programme GIScience research agenda 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Rinzivillo, S., Nanni, M., Pedreschi, D., Giannotti, F. (2009) Interactive Visual Clustering of Large Collections of Trajectories. In Proceed. IEEE Symp. Visual Analytics Science & Technology VAST, 3-10.Google Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M. (2000) Geography and computational science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90 (1), pp. 146–56.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, M.P., Rushton, G., Zimmerman, D.L. (1999) Geographically masking health data to preserve confidentiality. Statistics in Medicine, 18, pp. 497-525.Google Scholar
  4. Baerwald, T.J. (2010) Prospects for Geography as an Interdisciplinary Discipline, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 100(3), pp. 493-501.Google Scholar
  5. Batty M., Hudson-Smith A., Milton R., Crooks A. (2010) Map mashups, Web 2.0 and the GIS revolution. Annals of GIS 16(1), pp. 1-13.Google Scholar
  6. Bednarz, S.W. (2000) Connecting GIS and Problem Based Learning. In: Audet R.H. and Ludwig V. (Eds.) GIS in schools (ESRI Press, Redlands) pp. 89-101.Google Scholar
  7. Bednarz, S.W. (2011) Spatial literacy in the geographical sciences. Curriculum Making in Geography, Institute of Education, University of London & Intern. Geographical Union.Google Scholar
  8. Berry, B. and Marble, D. (Eds.) (1968) Spatial Analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
  9. Blaschke, T. (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS International Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65 (1), pp. 2-16.Google Scholar
  10. Blaschke, T. and Strobl J. (2010) Geographic Information Science Developments. GIS.Science Zeitschrift für Geoinformatik 23 (1), pp. 9-15.Google Scholar
  11. Blaschke, T., Strobl, J., Donert, K. (2011) Geographic Information Science: building a doctoral programme integrating interdisciplinary concepts and methods. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 21, pp. 139-146.Google Scholar
  12. Bodenhamer, D.J., Corrigan, J., Harris, T.M. (Eds.) (2010) The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship (Indiana University Press), 199 pages.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, D.G., Elmes, G., Kemp, K.K., Macey, S., Mark, D. (2004) Geographic Information Systems. In: Geography in America at the Dawn of the 21st Century G.L. Gaile, C.J. Willmott (Eds.) (Oxford University Press, Oxford), pp. 353-375.Google Scholar
  14. Burrough, P. and Frank, A.U. (Eds.) (1996) Geographic objects with indeterminate boundaries (Taylor & Francis, London)Google Scholar
  15. Chorley, R.J. and Kennedy, B.A. (1971) Physical Geography: a Systems Approach. Prentice-Hall International: London.Google Scholar
  16. Couclelis, H. (1999) Space, time, geography. in Geographical information systems Vol 1 (Eds.) P.A. Longley, M.F. Goodchild, D.J. Maguire, D.W. Rhind (Wiley & Sons, New York) pp. 29–38.Google Scholar
  17. Craglia, M., Goodchild, M.F., Annoni, A., Camara, G., Gould, M., Kuhn, W., Mark, D., Masser, I., Maguire, D., Liang, S., Parsons, E. (2008) Next-Generation Digital Earth: A position paper from the Vespucci Initiative for the Advancement of Geographic Information Science. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 3, pp. 146-167.Google Scholar
  18. Crampton, J. (2009) Being ontological. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 27, pp. 603-608.Google Scholar
  19. de Smith, M.J., Goodchild, M.F., Longley, P.A. (2009) Geospatial analysis: a comprehensive guide to principles, techniques, and software tools. (The Winchelsea Press, Leicester, UK)Google Scholar
  20. DiBiase, D.W., DeMers, M.N., Johnson, A.J., Kemp, K.K., Taylor-Luck, A., Plewe, B.S., Wentz, E.A. (Eds.) (2006) Geographic Information Science and Technology Body of Knowledge (Assoc. Am. Geographers, Washington DC)Google Scholar
  21. Dobson, J.E. and Fisher P.F. (2003) Geoslavery. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 22, pp. 47–52.Google Scholar
  22. Dodge, S., Weibel R., Lautenschütz, A-K. (2008) Towards a Taxonomy of Movement Patterns. Information Visualization 7 (3-4), pp. 240-252.Google Scholar
  23. Donert, K. (Ed) (2008) Future Prospects in Geography Geography in European higher education 7. (Liverpool Hope University Press, Liverpool)Google Scholar
  24. Duckham, M., Goodchild, M.F., Worboys, M.F., (Eds.) (2003) Foundations of geographic information science (Taylor & Francis, London)Google Scholar
  25. Egenhofer, M.J. and Mark, D. (1995) Naive geography. In: Frank A., Kuhn W., (Eds.) Spatial Information Theory: a theoretical basis for GIS Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 988 (Springer, Berlin) pp. 1-16.Google Scholar
  26. Egenhofer, M. and Golledge, R. (1998) Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information Systems. Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fabrikant, S.I. and Buttenfield, B.P. (2001) Formalizing semantic spaces for information access. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 91 (2), pp. 263–80.Google Scholar
  28. Foresman, T.W. (1998) GIS Early Years and the Threads of Evolution” In The History of Geographic Information Systems: Perspectives from the Pioneers (Ed) T W Foresman (Prentice Hall PTR: Upper Saddle River, NJ) pp. 3-17Google Scholar
  29. Goodchild, M.F. (1992) Geographical Information Science. Intern. Journal of Geographical Information Systems 6(1), pp. 31-45.Google Scholar
  30. Goodchild, M.F. (2004a) GIScience, Geography, Form, and Process. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (4), pp. 709–714Google Scholar
  31. Goodchild, M.F. (2004b) Scales of cybergeography” In: Sheppard, E., McMaster, R.B. (Eds.) Scale and Geographic Inquiry: Nature, Society, and Method (Blackwell: Malden, MA) pp. 154–169.Google Scholar
  32. Goodchild, M.F. (2005) What does Google Earth mean for the Spatial Sciences? GIS Ireland Conference proceedings October 13, 2005 Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  33. Goodchild, M.F. (2006) GIScience Ten Years After Ground Truth. Transactions in GIS 10 (5), pp. 687-692.Google Scholar
  34. Goodchild, M.F. (2007) Citizens as voluntary sensors: spatial data infrastructure in the world of Web 2.0. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research 2, pp. 24–32.Google Scholar
  35. Goodchild, M.F. (2009) Geographic information systems and science: today and tomorrow” Annals of GIS 15 (1) 3-9.Google Scholar
  36. Goodchild, M.F. (2010) Twenty years of progress: Giscience in 2010. Journal of Spatial Information Science 1, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  37. Goodchild, M.F. and Janelle D.G. (2010) Toward critical spatial thinking in the social sciences and humanities. GeoJournal 75(1), pp. 3–13.Google Scholar
  38. Goodchild, M.F., Yuan, M., Cova, T.J. (2007) Towards a general theory of geographic representation in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 21(3): 239–260.Google Scholar
  39. Grossner, K., Goodchild, M.F., Clarke, K. (2008) Defining a Digital Earth System. Transactions in GIS 12(1), 145-160.Google Scholar
  40. Güting, RH, Böhlen, M.H., Erwig, M., Jensen, C.S., Lorentzos, N.A., Schneider, M., Vazirgiannis, M. (2000) A foundation for representing and quering moving objects. ACM Transactions on Database System, 25(1), pp. 1-42.Google Scholar
  41. Güting, R.H. and Schneider, M. (2005) Moving Objects Databases. Morgan Kaufman Publisher, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  42. Hägerstrand, T. (1970) What about people in regional science? Papers of Regional Science Association 24, pp. 7-21.Google Scholar
  43. Hägerstrand, T. (1995) Action in the physical world. In: Cliff, AD, Gould, PR, Hoare, AG, Thrift, NJ (Eds.), Diffusing Geography. Essays for Peter Haggett. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, pp. 35–45.Google Scholar
  44. Heiser, J. and Tversky, B. (2006) Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams. Cognitive Science 30, pp. 581-592.Google Scholar
  45. Hofmann, P., Marschallinger, R., Daxner-Höck, G. (2009) 3D volume modelling of fossil small mammal teeth using micro CT and object based image analysis. In Computational Vision and Medical Image Processing Tavares J. and Jorge N., (Eds.) (CRC Press/Taylor & Francis) pp. 395-399.Google Scholar
  46. Jantsch, E. (1972) Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation. In Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities, 97–121. Paris: OECD/CERI.Google Scholar
  47. Jones, M.T. (2007) Google’s geospatial organizing principle. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, July/August 2007, pp. 8-13.Google Scholar
  48. Kemp, K. (2010) Geographic Information Science and Spatial Analysis for the Humanities” In: Bodenhamer, D., Harris, T., Corrigan, J. (Eds.) The Spatial Humanities (Indiana University Press) pp. 31-57.Google Scholar
  49. Kraak, J.M. (2003) Why maps matter in GIScience. The Cartographic Journal 43(1), pp. 82–89.Google Scholar
  50. Kraak J.M. (2008) Geovisualization and time: new opportunities for the space - time cube. In: Geographic visualization: concepts, tools and applications (Eds.) M. Dodge, M. McDerby, M. Turner (Wiley & Sons, Chichester) pp. 293-306.Google Scholar
  51. Kuhn, W. (2003) Semantic Reference Systems. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 17(5), pp. 405-409.Google Scholar
  52. Kwan, M-P. (2009) Three recent developments in critical GIS. Cartographica 44(1), pp. 11-12.Google Scholar
  53. Kwan M-P. and Schwanen T. (2009) Quantitative Revolution 2: The Critical (Re)Turn. The Professional Geographer 61(3), 283-291.Google Scholar
  54. Langran, G. (1992) Time in Geographic Information Systems. Taylor & Francis: London.Google Scholar
  55. Laube, P., Dennis T., Forer P., Walker M. (2007) Movement beyond the snapshot – Dynamic analysis of geospatial lifelines. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 31, pp. 481–501.Google Scholar
  56. Leitner, M. and Curtis A. (2006) A First Step Towards a Framework for Presenting the Location of Confidential Point Data on Maps - Results of an Empirical Perceptual Study. Intern. Journal of Geogr. Inf. Science, 20 (7), pp. 813-822.Google Scholar
  57. Longley, P.A., (2000) The academic success of GIS in geography: problems and prospects. Journal of Geographical Systems 2, pp. 37-42.Google Scholar
  58. Longley, P.A., Goodchild MF, Maguire D.J., Rhind D.W. (2010) (3rd ed) Geographic Information Systems and Science (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester)Google Scholar
  59. Mark, D.M. (2000) Geographic information science: Critical issues in an emerging cross-disciplinary research domain. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 12(1), pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
  60. Mark, D.M. (2003) Geographic Information Science: defining the field. In: Duckham, M., Goodchild, M.F., Worboys, M. (Eds.), Foundations of Geographic Information Science (Taylor & Francis, London) pp. 3–18.Google Scholar
  61. Marschallinger, R., Golaszewski, S., Kraus, J., Kronbichler, M., Kunz, A., Hofmann, P. (2009) Multiple Sclerosis: a Multidisciplinary Approach to the Analysis, 4D Modeling and Spatiotemporal Simulation of Lesion Pattern Evolution” In: Proc of SEECCM 2009, 2nd South-East-Europ. Conf Computational Mechanics.Google Scholar
  62. McMaster, R. and Usery L. (2005) A Research Agenda for Geographic Information Science, CRC Press.Google Scholar
  63. Meadows, D.H. (1972) Limits to Growth. New York: University books.Google Scholar
  64. Nellis, D. (2005) Geospatial Information Technology, Rural Resource Development, and Future. Geographies Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(1), pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  65. Österle, H., Becker, J., Frank, U., Hess, T., Karagiannis, D., Krcmar, H., Loos, P., Mertens, P., Oberweis, A., Sinz, E.J. (2010) Memorandum zur gestaltungsorientierten Wirtschaftsinformatik. Wirtschaftsinformatik 52(5), pp. 273–285.Google Scholar
  66. Randers, J. (1980) Elements of the System Dynamics Method. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  67. Raper, J. (2000) Multidimensional Geographical Information Science” (Taylor and Francis, London)Google Scholar
  68. Reed, C. (2006) OGC Sensor Web Enablement: Overview and High Level Architecture. OGC White Paper. http://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=15540
  69. Repko, A.F. (2008) Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Resch, B., Mittlboeck, M., Girardin, F., Britter, R., Ratti, C. (2009) Live Geography – Embedded Sensing for Standardised Urban Environmental Monitoring. International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements 2(2&3), pp. 156-167.Google Scholar
  71. Scholten, H.J., van de Velde, R., van Manen, N. (Eds.) (2009) Geospatial Technology and the Role of Location in Science (Springer, Berlin)Google Scholar
  72. Schuurman, N. (2006) Why formalization matters: critical GIS and ontology research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96, pp. 726-739.Google Scholar
  73. Singleton, A.D. and Longley, P.A. (2009) Geodemographics, visualisation, and social networks in applied geography. Applied Geography 29(3), pp. 289-298.Google Scholar
  74. Skupin, A. and Fabrikant, S.I. (2003) Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 30(2), pp. 95-115.Google Scholar
  75. Strobl, J. (2005) GI Science and technology - where next? GIS Development 9(8), pp. 40-43.Google Scholar
  76. Sui, D.Z. (2004a) Tobler’s first law of geography: A big idea for a small world?” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94, pp. 269–77.Google Scholar
  77. Sui, D.Z. (2004b) GIS, Cartography, and the ‘‘Third Culture’’: Geographic Imaginations in the Computer Age. The Professional Geographer 56 (1), pp. 62–72.Google Scholar
  78. Sui, D.Z. and Goodchild, M.F. (2003) A tetradic analysis of GIS and society using McLuhan’s law of media. The Canadian Geographer 47 (1), pp. 5–17.Google Scholar
  79. Taylor, P.J. and Johnston, R. (1995) GIS and geography. In: Pickles, J. (Ed.), Ground truth Guilford Press, New York pp. 68–87.Google Scholar
  80. Tiede, K., Boxall, A.B., Tiede, D., Tear, S.P., David, H., Lewis, J. (2009) A robust size-characterisation methodology for studying nanoparticle behaviour in ‘real’ environmental samples, using hydrodynamic chromatography coupled to ICP-MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 24, pp. 964 – 972.Google Scholar
  81. Tobler, W.R. (1970) A computer movie simulating population growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 42, pp. 234-240.Google Scholar
  82. Tobler, W.R. (1987) Experiments in migration mapping by computer. The American Cartographer, 14 (2), pp. 155-163.Google Scholar
  83. Torrens, P. (2008) Wi-Fi Geographies. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98(1), pp. 59-84.Google Scholar
  84. Torrens, P. 2010, Geography and computational social science. GeoJournal 75, pp. 133–148.Google Scholar
  85. Zhang, J.X. and Goodchild, M.F. (2002) Uncertainty in geographical information. (Taylor and Francis London)Google Scholar
  86. Zimmerer, K.S. (2007) Cultural ecology (and political ecology) in the ‘environmental borderlands’: exploring the expanded connectivities within geography. Progress in Human Geography 31(2), pp. 227-244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Blaschke
    • 1
  • Josef Strobl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lothar Schrott
    • 1
  • Robert Marschallinger
    • 1
    • 2
  • Franz Neubauer
    • 1
  • Andreas Koch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Euro Beinat
    • 1
  • Thomas Heistracher
    • 3
  • Siegfried Reich
    • 1
    • 4
  • Michael Leitner
    • 1
    • 5
  • Karl Donert
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SalzburgSalzburgAustria
  2. 2.Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institute for Geographic Information ScienceSalzburgAustria
  3. 3.Salzburg University of Applied SciencePuchAustria
  4. 4.Salzburg Research FGSalzburgAustria
  5. 5.Department of Geography and AnthropologyLouisiana State UniversityBatonrougeUSA

Personalised recommendations