Exploring New Ways for Personalized E-Commerce through Digital TV

  • Yolanda Blanco-Fernández
  • Martín López-Nores
  • José J. Pazos-Arias
  • Manuela I. Martín-Vicente
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 418)

Summary

The evolution of information technologies is consolidating recommender systems as essential tools in e-commerce.To date, these systems have focused on discovering the items that best match the preferences, interests and needs of individual users, to end up listing those items by decreasing relevance in some menus. In this paper,we propose extending the current scope of recommender systems to better support trading activities, by automatically generating interactive applications that provide the users with personalized commercial functionalities related to the selected items. We explore this idea in the context of Digital TV advertising, with a system that provide personalized commercial functionalities, gathering contents from multiple sources and bring together semantic reasoning techniques, SWRL rules and new architectural solutions for web services and mashups.

Keywords

Recommender System Semantic Similarity Domain Ontology Semantic Concept Lower Common Ancestor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Towards the next generation of recommender systems: a survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(6), 739–749 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanco-Fernández, Y., Pazos-Arias, J., López-Nores, M., Gil-Solla, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M.: AVATAR: An improved solution for personalized TV based on semantic inference. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 52(1), 223–231 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burke, R.: Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12(4), 331–370 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cho, Y., Kim, J.: Application of Web usage mining and product taxonomy to collaborative recommendations in e-commerce. Expert Systems with Applications 26, 233–246 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dias, M., Locher, D., Li, M., Elderedy, W., Lisboa, P.: The value of personalized recommender systems to e-business: A case study. In: Proc. of the 2008 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 291–294 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ganesan, P., Garcia-Molina, H., Widom, J.: Exploiting hierarchical domain structure to compute similarity. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 21(1), 64–93 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gawinecki, M., Mateusz, K., Paprzycki, M.: Ontology-based stereotyping in a travel support system. In: Proceedings of the XXI Fall Meeting of Polish Information Processing Society, pp. 73–85 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haase, P., Ehrig, M., Hotho, A., Schnizler, B.: Personalized Information Access in a Bibliographic Peer-to-Peer System. In: AAAI Workshop on Semantic Web Personalization, pp. 1–12 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hepp, M.: Products and services ontologies: a methodology for deriving OWL ontologies from industrial categorization standards. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 2(1), 72–99 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hepp, M., Leukel, J., Schmitz, V.: A quantitative analysis of product categorization standards: Content, coverage and maintenance of eCl@ss, UNSPSC, eOTD, and the RosettaNet Technical Dictionary. Knowledge and Information Systems 13(1), 77–114 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hu, S., Muthusamy, V., Li, G., Jacobsen, H.A.: Distributed automatic service composition in large-scale systems. In: Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, Rome, Italy (July 2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hung, L.: A personalized recommendation system based on product taxonomy for one-to-one marketing online. Expert Systems with Applications 29, 383–392 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kawamura, T., de Blasio, J.A., Hasegawa, T., Paolucci, M., Sycara, K.P.: Public Deployment of Semantic Service Matchmaker with UDDI Business Registry. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 752–766. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J., Pohl, W.: Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Online Customer Relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16(1), 111–155 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Krulwich, B.: LifeStyle Finder: Intelligent User Profiling Using Large-Scale Demographic. AI Magazine 18(2), 37–45 (1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kvaloy, T.A., Rongen, E., Tirado-Ramos, A., Sloot, P.: Automatic Composition and Selection of Semantic Web Services. In: Sloot, P.M.A., Hoekstra, A.G., Priol, T., Reinefeld, A., Bubak, M. (eds.) EGC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3470, pp. 184–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin, N., Kuter, U., Hendler, J.: Web Service composition via problem decomposition across multiple ontologies.In: Proc. of the IEEE Congress on Services, Salt Lake City, USA (July 2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    López-Nores, M., Pazos-Arias, J.J., García-Duque, J., Blanco-Fernández, Y., Martín-Vicente, M.I., Fernández-Vilas, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M., Gil-Solla, A.: MiSPOT: Dynamic product placement for digital TV through MPEG-4 processing and semantic reasoning. Knowledge and Information Systems (in press), doi:10.1007/s10115-009-0200-8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    López-Nores, M., Rey-López, M., Pazos-Arias, J.J., García-Duque, J., Blanco-Fernández, Y., Gil-Solla, A., Díaz-Redondo, R.P., Fernández-Vilas, A., Ramos-Cabrer, M.: Spontaneous interaction with audiovisual contents for personalized e-commerce over Digital TV. Expert Systems with Applications 36, 4192–4197 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin, D.L., Paolucci, M., McIlraith, A.A., Burstein, M.H., McDermott, D.V., McGuinness, D.L., Parsia, B., Payne, T.R., Sabou, M., Solanki, M., Srinivasan, N., Sycara, K.P.: Bringing Semantics to Web Services: The OWL-S Approach. In: Cardoso, J., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) SWSWPC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3387, pp. 26–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maybury, M., Greiff, W., Boykin, S., Ponte, J., McHenry, C., Ferro, L.: Personalcasting: Tailored broadcast news. In: Personalized Digital Television. Targeting programs to individual users. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Middleton, S.: Capturing knowledge of user preferences with recommender systems. PhD thesis, Department of Electronic and Computer Science. University of Southampton (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Montaner, M., López, B., De la Rosa, J.: A taxonomy of recommender agents on the Internet. Artificial Intelligence Review 19(4), 285–330 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Plas, D., Verheijen, M., Zwaal, H., Hutschemaekers, M.: Manipulating context information with swrl. Report of A-MUSE project (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettnet, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, and Cybern. 19(1), 17–30 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Resnik, P.: Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 11(4), 95–130 (1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rich, E.: User modeling via stereotypes. International Journal of Cognitive Science 3(1), 329–354 (1979)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosco, R.D., Rogers, M.K., Liles, S.: Breaking Down Stereotypes: A Call for an Ontological Model. In: Proceedings of International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 271–278 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schafer, J., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: E-commerce recommendation applications. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery 5(1), 115–151 (2001)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shani, G., Rokach, L., Meisles, A., Gleizer, Y., Ben-Shimon, D.: A stereotypes-based hybrid recommender system for media items. In: 22nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2007), pp. 60–75 (2007)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Wu, D., Hendler, J.A., Nau, D.S.: HTN planning for Web Service composition using SHOP2. Journal of Web Semantics 1(4), 377–396 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    DVB: The Multimedia Home Platform.ETSI standard TS 102 812 (2003), http://www.mhp.org
  33. 33.
    Walsh, A.E.: UDDI, SOAP, and WSDL: The Web Services Specification reference book. Pearson Education (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhang, H., Zheng, S., Yuan, J.: A personalized TV guide system compliant with MHP. IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics 51(2), 731–737 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, R., Arpirar, I.B., Aleman-Meza, B.: Automatic composition of semantic Web Services. Information Systems Journal, 38–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zhu, T., Greiner, R., Häubl, G.: An effective complete-web recommender system. In: Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web conference, Budapest, Hungary (May 2003)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ziegler, C., Lausen, G., Konstan, J.: On exploiting classification taxonomies in recommender systems. AI Comnmunications 21(2-3), 97–125 (2008)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yolanda Blanco-Fernández
    • 1
  • Martín López-Nores
    • 1
  • José J. Pazos-Arias
    • 1
  • Manuela I. Martín-Vicente
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Telematics EngineeringUniversity of Vigo, EE TelecomunicaciónVigoSpain

Personalised recommendations