Advertisement

Enhancing the Simulation of Turbulent Kinetic Energy in the Marine Atmospheric Boundary Layer

  • Richard J. Foreman
  • Stefan Emeis
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 141)

Abstract

Improvements in the calculation of turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) by the Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) turbulence closure scheme in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model are presented with a focus on turbulence as measured by the offshore measurement platform in the North Sea, FINO1. Updates to the MYJ scheme to be presented here are however expected to be equally valid over land as well as the sea, since they are based on recent high Reynolds number boundary layer experiments in the laboratory. Improvements of 40% (RMS) in the calculation of TKE by the updated MYJ scheme for a high wind speed period at FINO1 during January 2005 are reported here.

Keywords

Particle Image Velocimetry Turbulent Kinetic Energy Wind Energy Numerical Weather Prediction Model Turbulence Closure Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Businger, J.A., Wyngaard, J.C., Iyumi, Z., Bradley, E.F.: Flux-profile relationships in the atmospheric surface layer. J. Atmos. Sci. 28, 181–189 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carlier, J., Stanislas, M.: Experimental study of eddy structures in a turbulent boundary layer using particle image velocimetry. J. Fluid Mech. 535, 143–188 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janjic, Z.I.: Nonsingular implementation of the mellor-yamda level 2.5 scheme in the ncep meso model. Technical report, National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Office Note No. 437 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mellor, G.L., Yamada, T.: Development of a turbulence closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 20, 851–875 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakanishi, M.: Improvement of the mellor-yamada turbulence closure model based on large-eddy simulation data. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 99, 349–378 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neumann, T., Nolopp, K.: Three years operation of far offshore measurements at fino1. DEWI Magazine 30, 42–46 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Österlund, J.M.: Experimental studies of zero pressure-gradient turbulent boundary layer flow. PhD thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanics, Stockholm, Sweden (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Skamarock, W.C., Klemp, J.B., Dudhia, J., Gill, D.O., Barker, D.M., Duda, M.G., Huang, X.Y., Wang, W., Powers, J.G.: A description of the advanced research wrf version 3. Technical report, National Center for Atmospheric Research (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Meteorology and Climate ResearchKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyGarmisch-PartenkirchenGermany

Personalised recommendations