Advertisement

Towards a Typology of Strategies for User Involvement

  • Arne H. Krumsvik
Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Four types of strategic approach for traditional media in the utilization of social media are identified. The Donation strategy includes users in the production of content. The Distribution strategy utilizes viral marketing in order to invite potential users to consume this content, while the Deliberation strategy enables users to react and interact with the produced and distributed content. At last The Data Gathering Strategy accumulate information about users and their interaction in order to better serve the same users and potential advertisers.

News organizations might choose to execute several of the strategies in order to create value for users, advertisers, shareholders, and the society. This will especially be relevant if Data Gathering is the main strategic approach. However, observed practices indicates a low strategic awareness of the potential of different approaches, hence higher awareness and clarity on strategic intentions might contribute to both higher value creation and possibly also reduce some of the professional skepticism to user involvement as part of the online efforts by traditional news organizations.

Keywords

News Story User Involvement Online News Professional Norm News Organization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barzilai-Nahon, K. (2008a). Gatekeeping: a critical review. Pre-Print Draft – February 2008. Arist-Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  2. Bentley, C. H. (2005). Reconnecting with the audience. Nieman Reports, 59(4), 26–28.Google Scholar
  3. Bentley, C., Littau, J., Hamman, B., Meyer, H., Welsh, B., & Watson, B. (2005). The citizen journalism movement: Mymissourian as a case study, association for education in journalism and mass communication. TX: San Antonio.Google Scholar
  4. Bentley, C., Hamman, B., Littau, J., Meyer, H., Watson, B., & Welsh, B. (2007). Citizen journalism: A case study. In M. Tremayne (Ed.), Blogging, citizenship and the future of media (pp. 239–259). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in online newspapers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bronson, P. (1998). Hotmale. Wired Magazine, 6(12), 166–174.Google Scholar
  7. Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  9. Bybee, C. (1999). Can democracy survive in the post-factual age? A return to the Lippmann-Dewey debate about the politics of news. Journalism Communication Monographs, 1(1), 29–66.Google Scholar
  10. Carpentier, N., & De Cleen, B. (Eds.). (2008). Participation and media production. Critical reflections on content creation. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, D. (2011). Facebook ‘Social Readers’ Amass Millions Of Users. Allfacebook.comGoogle Scholar
  12. Daugherty, T., Eastin, M. S., & Bright, L. (2008). Exploring consumer motivations for creating user-generated content. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deuze, M. (2001). Understanding the impact of the internet: On New Media Profesionalism, Mindsets and Buzzwords. Ejournalist, 1(1).Google Scholar
  14. Domingo, D. (2004). Comparing professional routines and values in online newsrooms: A reflection from a case study. Paper presented at the IAMCR Conference.Google Scholar
  15. Engebretsen, M. (2001). Nyheten som hypertekst: Tekstuelle aspekter ved møtet mellom en gammel sjanger og ny teknologi. Kristiansand: IJ-forlaget.Google Scholar
  16. Gillmor, D. (2004). We the media. Grassroots journalism, by the people, for the people. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  17. Glaser, M. (2004, November 17). The new voices: Hyperlocal citizen media sites want you (to write). Online Journalism Review, Los Angeles: USC Annenberg.Google Scholar
  18. Haas, T. (2007). The pursuit of public journalism. Theory, practice, and criticism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Harper, C. (1998). And that's the way it will be: News and information in a digital world. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hermida, A., & Thurman, N. (2007). Comments please: How the British news media are struggling with user-generated content. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Online Journalism. From http://journalism.utexas.edu/onlinejournalism/2007/papers/Hermida.pdf
  21. Ihlebæk, K. A. (2009). Folkejournalistikk i NRK redaksjonelle valg og utøvelse av kontroll. Norsk Medietidsskrift, 16(4), 363–378.Google Scholar
  22. Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. Where old and new media collide. NewYork: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jurvetson, S. (2000). What exactly is viral marketing? Red Herring, 78, 110–112.Google Scholar
  24. Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the Amateur. How today’s internet is killing our culture. New York: Doubleday/Currency.Google Scholar
  25. Kleis Nielsen, R. (2010). Participation through letters to the editor: Circulation, considerations, and genres in the letters institution. Journalism, 11(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krumsvik, A. H. (2005). Presse-nei til nettdebatt. Dagens Næringsliv (20.06.05).Google Scholar
  27. Krumsvik, A. H. (2009). The online news factory: A multi-lens investigation of the strategy, structure, and process of online news production at CNN and NRK. Ph.D. thesis. Acta Humaniora No 394. Oslo: University of Oslo/Unipub.Google Scholar
  28. Krumsvik, A. H., Skogerbø, E., & Storsul, T. (2013). Size, ownership, and innovations in newspapers. In T. Storsul & A. H. Krumsvik (Eds.), Media innovations. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  29. Küng, L., Leandros, N., Picard, R. G., Shroeder, R., & van der Wurff, R. (2008a). The impact of the internet on media organisation strategies and structures. In L. Küng, R. Picard, & R. Towse (Eds.), The internet and the mass media. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  30. Küng, L., Picard, R., & Towse, R. (Eds.). (2008b). The internet and the mass media. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
  31. Leskovec, J., Adamic, L. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2007). The dynamics of viral marketing. ACM Transactions on the Web, 1, 1 (May 2007).Google Scholar
  32. Lindholm, M. (2006). Maskespill og nettdebatt. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift, 23(4), 357–367.Google Scholar
  33. Loomis, D. (2001). A tale of two cities: Do small-town dailies practice public journalism without knowing it? Paper presented at the AEJMC Conference.Google Scholar
  34. Matheson, D. (2004). Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: some trends in online journalism. New Media and Society, 6(4), 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCullagh, C. (2002). Media power. A sociological introduction. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  36. McMillan, S., Guppy, M., Kunz, B., & Reis, R. A. (1996). Defining moment: Who says what about public journalism. Paper presented at the AEJMC Conference.Google Scholar
  37. Örnebring, H. (2008). The consumer as producer of what? User-generated tabloid content in The Sun (UK) and Aftonbladet (Sweden). Journalism Studies, 9(5), 771–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ottosen, R., & Krumsvik, A. H. (Eds.). (2008). Journalistikk i en digital hverdag. Kristiansand: IJ-forlaget/Høgskoleforlaget (Norwegian Academic Press).Google Scholar
  39. Ottosen, R., & Krumsvik, A. H. (2010). Digitization and editorial change in online media. Findings from a Norwegian research project. Nordicom Information, 32(4), 17–26.Google Scholar
  40. Pavlik, J. (1999). Journalism and new media. New York: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Raeymaeckers, K. (2005). Letters to the editor: A feedback opportunity turned into a marketing tool. European Journal of Communication, 2(20), 199–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Rosen, J. (1999). The action of the idea. In T. Glasser (Ed.), The idea of public journalism. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rosen, J. (2000). The essence of public journalism. In J. Strömbäck (Ed.), Public Journalism på svenska, SDMI Skrift nr. 3, Demokratiinstitutet.Google Scholar
  45. Schroeder, R. (2004). Online review. Journalism Studies, 5(4), 563–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shoemaker, P. (1991). Communication concepts 3: Gatekeeping. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Shoemaker, P., & Vos, T. (2009). Gatekeeping theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Skogerbø, E., & Winsvold, M. (2007). Lærer seg debatt på nettet. Aftenposten (08.01.07).Google Scholar
  49. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sundet, V. S., & Ytreberg, E. (2009). Working notions of active audiences: Further research on the active participant in convergent media industries. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 15(4), 383–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Terdiman, D. (2004). Open arms for open-source news. Wired News. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,64285,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_4
  52. Vaage, O. F. (2010). Norsk mediebarometer. Oslo: Statistics Norway.Google Scholar
  53. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002a). The construction of the public in letters to the editor. Deliberative democracy and the idiom of insanity. Journalism, 3(2), 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2002b). Understanding the conditions for public discourse: Four rules for selecting letters to the editor. Journalism Studies, 3(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations