Two Faces of Growth: Linking Customer Engagement to Revenue Streams

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Contemporary understanding of social media activities is facing two major obstacles—measuring customer engagement and analyzing social media financial performance. These two questions have different attributes and are predominantly interpreted by wide variety of disciplines and analytical frameworks. In terms of the interpretation of the value creation in media two focal points could be distinguished that are interpreting the demand side and the supply side of the social media activities.

Business models and business model design in social media put an extreme emphasis on the demand side of the media product—value of the media is becoming a function of its network valuation dependant on the number and perceived value of its users. This has led to proliferation of open source strategy and cooperation games played online that pulled the integration of loyalty business models within network effect models. Central point in these models is the measurement of customer engagement.

As we understand the social media activity in the light of consumer engagement and demand side economies what is the effect on social media core value in pure financial terms. If the main assets of social media companies are its ingenious competence to constitute loyal consumer base and gather data through new technologies—how much are they worth? If we rely on intangibles and analyze social media past financial results, we will find poor accountant statistics. However, the revenue growth the social media are experiencing makes these financials to have low predicting power. Growing global online advertising market and social media consumption renewed the optimism.

Keywords

Social Network Social Medium Revenue Stream Page View Customer Engagement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arketi. (2009). A PR professional guide to understanding Web 2.0 and new media. Available from http://www.arketi.com/.
  2. Castels, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–66.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, L., Hamao, Y., & Lakonishok, J. (1991). Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan. Journal of Finance, 46, 1739–1789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chan-Olmsted, S., & Chang, B. (2003). Diversification strategy of global media conglomerates: Examining its patterns and determinants. Journal of Media Economics, 16(4), 213–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chao, L. (2011, December 13). Viadeo in venture with Russian unit of Sanoma. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from, http://www.online.wsj.com.
  6. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business.Google Scholar
  7. Coase, R. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(6). Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.
  8. comScore. (2011, December 21). It’s social world. Available from http://www.comscore.com/layout/set/popup/request/Presentations.
  9. Copeland, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, J. (2000). Valuation: Measuring and managing value of companies (3rd ed.). Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Cowan, L. (2009, December 27). IPOs in 2010: More and more diverse. The Wall Street Journal. Available from www.online.wsj.com.
  11. Coyne, K., & Subramaniam, S. (1996). Bringing discipline to strategy. McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 14–25.Google Scholar
  12. Daidj, N., Grazia, C., & Hammoudi, A. (2010). Introduction to the non-cooperative approach to coalition formation: The case of the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD standards’ war. Journal of Media Economics, 23(4), 192–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment valuation. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Damodaran, A. (2006). Damodaran on valuation: Security analysis for investment and corporate finance. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Dimson, E., & Marsh, P. (1986). Event studies and the size effect: The case of UK press recommendations. Journal of Financial Economics, 17, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dobbs, R., & Koller, T. (1998). The expectation treadmill. McKinsey Quarterly, N3, 32–43.Google Scholar
  17. Economides, N. (1996). The economics of networks. International Journal of Industrial Organization, N16, 673–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Edison Research & Arbitron. (2011). The social habit II: the Edison research/arbitron internet and multimedia study 2011. Retrieved from http://www.hubspot.com.
  19. e-Tailing group and power reviews (2011). The 2011 social shopping study.Google Scholar
  20. Exact Target. (2011) The meaning of Like. Available from www.exacttarget.com
  21. Experian Hitwise. (2011). Top 10 social-networking websites and forums. Available from http://www.marketingcharts.com.
  22. Freed, L. (2011) Foresee Results – Annual e-business report for American Customer Satisfaction Index. Available from www.foreseeresults.com.
  23. Garone, E. (2010, March 5). Promoting yourself on LinkedIn. The Wall Street Journal. Available from www.online.wsj.com
  24. Godson, M. (2009). Relationship marketing. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.Google Scholar
  25. Hitt, M., et al. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39(N5), 1084–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Knaup, A., & Piazza, M. (2007). Business employment dynamics data: Survival and longevity. Monthly Labor Review, 130, 3–10.Google Scholar
  27. LinkedIn. (2011a). Form S-1/A (Securities Registration Statement). Available from http://www.linkedin.com.
  28. LinkedIn. (2011b). Analyst metrics 2011 Q3. Available from http://www.linkedin.com.
  29. LinkedIn. (2011c). Form 10-Q (Quarterly Report), 2011 Q3 report. Available from http://www.linkedin.com.
  30. MagnaGlobal. (2011). 2011 Advertising forecast. Retrieved from http://www.magnaglobal.com.
  31. Marketing Sherpa. (2011). Search marketing benchmark survey. Available from www.marketingsherpa.com.
  32. Mueller, D. (1972). A life cycle theory of the firm. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 20(N3), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nielsen, & NM Incite. (2011). State of the social media: Social media report Q3 2011. Available from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/.
  34. North, D. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Ovide, S. & Das, A. (2011, January 27). LinkedIn IPO: It’s here! The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.online.wsj.com.
  36. Ovide, S. (2011, January 28). Is LinkedIn worth $3 billion? The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.online.wsj.com.
  37. Performics. (2011, October 26). Social shopping summary.Google Scholar
  38. Porter, M. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, 86–104.Google Scholar
  39. Russolillo, S. & Conway, B. (2011, November 2). Short Sellers Seize on LinkedIn Ahead of Earnings. The Wall Street Journal. Available from www.online.wsj.com.
  40. Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. ROI Research. (2011, June). S-Net: A study in social media usage & behaviour. Sponsored by Performics.Google Scholar
  42. Schumpeter, J. (1939). Business cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of capitalist process. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  43. Shiller, R. (2005). Irrational exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stone, B. (2010, September 22). Facebook sells your friends. Businessweek. Available from http://www.Businessweek.com/magazine/content.
  45. Technorati. (2011). The state of the blogosphere. Available from http://technorati.com/blogging/.
  46. Willamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism (pp. 55–60). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sofia UniversitySofiaBulgaria

Personalised recommendations