Social Media, Aggregation and the Refashioning of Media Business Models

Chapter
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

The mass media model has been based upon integrated value chains in which the function of aggregation has been the lynchpin, drawing audiences to content and providing the point of engagement between content consumption, the generation of income and the realisation of value accrued (Porter. Competitive advantage. New York, NY: Free Press; 1985).

Following the pioneering work of Ramirez and Normann (1993) value in enterprises has come increasingly to be seen as being co-produced by a multiple actors, collaborating in a network of relationships in which value is created and rewards are secured in a variety of ways.

Such network models are particularly suited for the study of social media models and media organisations in which content is crowdsourced or generated by users and where production is decentralised and devolved rather the centralised and controlled.

Arguably, on demand modes of consumption compound the tendencies to disaggregation inherent in such networked and distributed models. This chapter argues, however, that aggregation, in its various forms, remains and will continue to remain central to the success of media business models. In doing so it explores the nature of aggregation, explores in various dimensions and attributes, and examines examples of how this function is changing within current media services.

Keywords

Aggregation Function Content Owner Media Firm News Corporation Public Service Broadcaster 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Baumüller, I. (2012, February 10–11). News media and their challenge to manage recipients’ trust European Media Management Education Association Conference. Budapest.Google Scholar
  2. Benkler, Y. (2002). Coases penguin, or, Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law Journal, 112, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, M. (2007). A licence to be different: The story of Channel 4. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, C., & Goodwin, P. (2010). Constructing Public Service Media at the BBC. In G. Lowe (Ed.), The public in public service media. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. (2007). Produsage: A working definition. Available from http://produsage.org/node/9. Accessed 6 May 2012.
  6. Campbell, L. (2010, September 28). All3Media boss slams Google. Broadcast. Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society: Volume 1: The information age. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Chesbrough, H., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (2002). The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s technology spin-off companies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(3), 529–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesbrough, H. (2008). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cordrey, T. speech presented by Tanya Cordrey, director of digital development, Guardian News & Media, at the Guardian Changing Media Summit, London. 21 March, 2012. http://www.guardian.co.uk/gnm-press-office/changing-media-summit-tanya-cordrey Accessed 23 March 2012.
  11. D’Arma, A. (2011). Content aggregation in the age of online video: An analysis of the impact of Internet distribution on the television business. Journal of Media Business Studies, 8(3).Google Scholar
  12. Dredge, S. (2012). Google TV YouTube app gets discovery-focused update. Guardian Apps Blog. Available from http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/appsblog/2012/feb/13/google-tv-youtube-app-update. Accessed 13 February 2012.
  13. Ellis, J. (2000). Scheduling: The last creative act in television. Media, Culture and Society, 22, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Filloux, F. (2010, September 19) Aggregators: The good ones vs. the looters. The Monday Note.Google Scholar
  15. Halliday, J. (2011, September 22). Facebook to transform into an entertainment hub. The Guardian. Google Scholar
  16. Harris Interactive. (2012). Netflix and YouTube are must have apps for Smart TV owners. Available from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/NewsRoom/HarrisPolls/tabid/447/mid/1508/articleId/1048/ctl/ReadCustom%20Default/Default.aspx. Accessed 19 July 2012.
  17. Heine, C. (2012, July 20). Amazon recommending offers? Cool. Facebook? No thanks. Adweek.Google Scholar
  18. Indivik. (2012). Publishers begin pulling advertising from Flipboard. Mashable. Available from http://mashable.com/2012/06/25/flipboard-new-yorker-wired-advertising/. Accessed 25 June 2012.
  19. Johnson, B. (2009, November 9). Murdoch could block Google searches entirely. The Guardian. Google Scholar
  20. Johnson, B. (2012). Zeebox boss says smart TV is a dumb idea. GigaOM. Available from http://gigaom.com/2012/04/02/zeebox-boss-says-smart-tv-is-a-dumb-idea/. Accessed 5 April 2012.
  21. Keller, B. (2011, March 10). All the aggregation that’s fit to aggregate. The New York Times. Google Scholar
  22. Murray, A. M. (2012, February 10–11). Rationalising public service: Scheduling as a tool of management in RTE television. Paper European Media Management Education Association Conference. Budapest.Google Scholar
  23. Napoli, P. M. (2003). Audience economics: Media institutions and the audience marketplace. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Normann, R., & Ramírez, R. (1993, July–August). From value chain to value constellation: Designing interactive strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65–77.Google Scholar
  25. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Ramirez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practice and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rose, A. (2012, June 17). Interview. TechCrunch TV. Available from http://techcrunch.com/2012/06/17/zeebox-tctv-demo/. Accessed 24 June 2012.
  28. The Guardian. (2010, July 6). Leading the way through mutualisation. The Guardian. Google Scholar
  29. Walker. (2012, June 14). Habbo Hotel: NSPCC urges government and technology industry to act. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  30. Williams, R. (2003). Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  31. Wingfield, N. (2012, April 27). In search of apps for television. New York Times. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WestminsterWestminsterUK

Personalised recommendations