Advertisement

A Continuous Time Mover-Stayer Model for Labor Market in a Northern Italian Area

  • Fabrizio Cipollini
  • Camilla Ferretti
  • Piero Ganugi
  • Mario Mezzanzanica
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization book series (STUDIES CLASS)

Abstract

A new and powerful source of information concerning the Italian Labor Market is represented by C.OBB datasets, which record the kind of job contract (with its successive modifications) of all the workers in many Italian Provinces. By means of this information and focusing on the Province of Cremona, we analyze the mobility of employees among different kinds of job contracts (and unemployment also): in particular, from contracts characterized by modest packages of securities toward more structured working relations, ending with Unlimited Time Duration Contracts. The statistical tool used for this analysis is Continuous Time Mover-Stayer Model. Our analysis reveals low mobility from Limited Time Duration to Unlimited Time Duration contracts.

Keywords

Transition Matrix Gibbs Sampler Markov Chain Model Latent Class Model Italian Province 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Berger, J. O. (1985). Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analisys (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Blumen, I., Kogan, M., & McCarthy, P. J. (1955). The industrial mobility of labor as a probability process. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Casella, G., & Robert, C. P. (2009). Introducing MonteCarlo methods with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Cipollini, F., Ferretti, C., & Ganugi, P. (2012). Firm size dynamics in an industrial district: the Mover Stayer Model in action, A. Di Ciaccio et al. (eds), Advanced statistical methods for the analysis of large datasets, Studies in Theoretical and Applied Statistics, pp. 443–452, Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  5. Fougere, D., & Kamionka, T. (2003). Bayesian inference for the Mover-Stayer model of continuous time. Journal of Applied Economics,18, 697–723.Google Scholar
  6. Frydman, H. (1984). Maximum-Likelihood estimation in the Mover-Stayer model. Journal of the American Statistical Association,79, 632–638.Google Scholar
  7. Frydman, H., & Kadam, A. (2002). Estimation in the continuous time Mover Stayer model with an application to bond rating migration. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry,20, 155–170.Google Scholar
  8. Frydman, H., Kallberg, J. K., & Kao, D. L. (1985). Testing the adequacy of Markov Chain and Mover-Stayer models as representation of credit behavior. Operations Research,33(6), 1203–1214.Google Scholar
  9. Geweke, J., Robert, C. M., & Gary, A. Z. (1986). Mobility indices in continuous time Markov chains. Econometrica,54(6), 1407–1423.Google Scholar
  10. Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (1996). Matrix computation (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Goodman, L. A. (1961). Statistical methods for the Mover-Stayer model. Journal of the American Statistical Association,56, 841–868.Google Scholar
  12. Inamura, Y. (2006). Estimating continuous time transition matrices from discretely observed data. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series No. 06-E 07, Tokyo.Google Scholar
  13. Quah, D. (1993). Empirical cross section dynamics in economic growth. Empirical Economic Review,37, 426–434.Google Scholar
  14. Shorrocks, A. F. (1978). The measurement of mobility. Econometrica,46(5), 1013–1024.Google Scholar
  15. Singer, B., & Spilerman, S. (1976). The representation of social processes by Markov models. American Journal of Sociology,82(1), 1–54.Google Scholar
  16. Spilerman, S. (1972). Extensions of the Mover-Stayer model. American Journal of Sociology,78, 599–626.Google Scholar
  17. Tursi, A., & Varesi, P. A. (2010). Lineamenti di Diritto del Lavoro. Padua: CEDAM.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabrizio Cipollini
    • 1
  • Camilla Ferretti
    • 2
  • Piero Ganugi
    • 3
  • Mario Mezzanzanica
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of StatisticsUniversità di FirenzeFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Social SciencesUniversità Cattolica del Sacro CuorePiacenzaItaly
  3. 3.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversitá, degli Studi di ParmaParmaItaly
  4. 4.Department of StatisticsMilano Bicocca UniversityMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations