Temporal Action Language (TAL): A Controlled Language for Consistency Checking of Natural Language Temporal Requirements

(Preliminary Results)
  • Wenbin Li
  • Jane Huffman Hayes
  • Mirosław Truszczyński
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7226)

Abstract

We introduce Temporal Action Language (TAL). We design TAL as a key component of our approach that aims to semi-automate the process of consistency checking of natural language temporal requirements. Analysts can use TAL to express temporal requirements precisely and unambiguously. We describe the syntax and semantics of TAL and illustrate how to use TAL to represent temporal requirements.

Keywords

Natural Language Processing Temporal Requirement Temporal Constraint Stable Model Semantic Initial Constraint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alur, R., Dill, D.L.: A theory of timed automata. Theoretical Computer Science 126, 183–235 (1994)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baier, C., Katoen, J.P.: Principles of Model Checking. The MIT Press (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baral, C., Gelfond, M.: Reasoning agents in dynamic domains. Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence, 257–279 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dutertre, B., Stavridou, V.: Formal requirements analysis of an avionics control system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE 23, 267–278 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gebser, M., Ostrowski, M., Schaub, T.: Constraint Answer Set Solving. In: Hill, P.M., Warren, D.S. (eds.) ICLP 2009. LNCS, vol. 5649, pp. 235–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Action languages. Electronic Transactions on Artificial Intelligence (ETAI) 2, 193–210 (1998)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heitmeyer, C.: Software cost reduction. In: Marciniak, J.J. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klein, M.: An exception handling approach to enhancing consistency, completeness and correctness in collaborative requirements capture. Concurrent Engineering Research and Applications 5, 37–46 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lamsweerde, A.V., Darimont, R., Letier, E.: Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24(11), 908–926 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marek, V., Truszczynski, M.: Stable models and an alternative logic programming paradigm. In: The Logic Programming Paradigm: a 25-Year Perspective, pp. 375–398 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niemela, I.: Logic programs with stable model semantics as a constraint paradigm. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 25, 241–273 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Olderog, E.R., Dierks, H.: Real-Time Systems. CUP (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pnueli, A.: The temporal logic of programs. In: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 46–57 (1977)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenbin Li
    • 1
  • Jane Huffman Hayes
    • 1
  • Mirosław Truszczyński
    • 1
  1. 1.University of KentuckyUSA

Personalised recommendations