Riemann, Hurwitz and Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta Functions and Associated Series and Integrals

  • H. M. Srivastava


The main object of this article is to present a survey-cum-expository account of some recent developments involving the Riemann Zeta function \(\zeta (s)\), the Hurwitz (or generalized) Zeta function \(\zeta (s,a)\), and the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function \(\Phi (z,s,a)\) as well as its various interesting extensions and generalizations. We first investigate the problems associated with the evaluations and representations of \(\zeta \left (s\right )\) when \(s \in \mathbb{N} \setminus \left \{1\right \}\), \(\mathbb{N}\) being the set of natural numbers, emphasizing upon several interesting classes of rapidly convergent series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\) \(\left (n \in \mathbb{N}\right )\) which have been developed in recent years. In two of many computationally useful special cases considered here, it is observed that \(\zeta \left (3\right )\) can be represented by means of series which converge much more rapidly than that in Euler’s celebrated formula as well as the series which was used more recently by Roger Apéry (1916–1994) in his proof of the irrationality of \(\zeta \left (3\right )\). Symbolic and numerical computations using Mathematica (Version 4.0) for Linux show, among other things, that only 50 terms of one of these series are capable of producing an accuracy of seven decimal places. We also consider a variety of series and integrals associated with the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function \(\Phi (z,s,a)\) as well as its various interesting extensions and generalizations.


Zeta Function Series Representation Symbolic Computation Riemann Zeta Function Bernoulli Number 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



It is a great pleasure for me to dedicate this presentation to Prof. Dr. Stephen Smale on the occasion of his eightieth birthday. The present investigation was supported, in part, by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada under Grant OGP0007353.


  1. 1.
    M. Abramowitz, I.A. Stegun (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, 1964); Reprinted by Dover Publications, New York, 1965 (see also [32])Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Alzer, D. Karayannakis, H.M. Srivastava, Series representations for some mathematical constants. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 320, 145–162 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Apéry, Irrationalité de \(\zeta \left (2\right )\) et \(\zeta \left (3\right )\), in Journées Arithmétiques de Luminy (Colloq. Internat. CNRS, Centre University Luminy, Luminy, 1978), pp. 11–13, Astérisque 61, Society Mathematical, France, Paris, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.-P. Chen, H.M. Srivastava, Some families of series representations for the Riemann \(\zeta \left (3\right )\). Result. Math. 33, 179–197 (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. Choi, H.M. Srivastava, V.S. Adamchik, Multiple Gamma and related functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 134, 515–533 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Choi, Y.J. Cho, H.M. Srivastava, Series involving the Zeta and multiple Gamma functions. Appl. Math. Comput. 159, 509–537 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Choi, D.S. Jang, H.M. Srivastava, A generalization of the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function. Integral Transform. Spec. Funct. 19, 65–79 (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Cvijović, J. Klinowski, New rapidly convergent series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 125, 1263–1271 (1997)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Da̧browski, A note on the values of the Riemann Zeta function at positive odd integers. Nieuw Arch. Wiskd. 14(4), 199–207 (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F. G. Tricomi, Higher Transcendental Functions, vol. I (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York/Toronto/London, 1953)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Erdélyi, W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, F.G. Tricomi, Tables of Integral Transforms, vol. II (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York/Toronto/London, 1954)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.A. Ewell, A new series representation for \(\zeta \left (3\right )\), Am. Math. Mon. 97, 219–220 (1990)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.A. Ewell, On the Zeta function values \(\zeta (2k + 1),\;k = 1,2,\cdots \,.\) Rocky Mt. J. Math. 25, 1003–1012 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Garg, K. Jain, H.M. Srivastava, Some relationships between the generalized Apostol-Bernoulli polynomials and Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta functions. Integral Transform Spec. Funct. 17, 803–815 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Garg, K. Jain, S.L. Kalla, A further study of general Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function. Algebras Groups Geom. 25, 311–319 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.L. Glasser, Some integrals of the arctangent function. Math. Comput. 22, 445–447 (1968)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.W. Gosper Jr., A calculus of series rearrangements, in Algorithms and Complexity: New Directions and Recent Results, ed. by J.F. Traub (Academic, New York/London/Toronto, 1976), pp. 121–151Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.P. Goyal, R.K. Laddha, On the generalized Zeta function and the generalized Lambert function. Gadnita Sandesh 11, 99–108 (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P.L. Gupta, R.C. Gupta, S.-H. Ong, H.M. Srivastava, A class of Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta distributions and their applications in reliability. Appl. Math. Comput. 196, 521–531 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    E.R. Hansen, A Table of Series and Products (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1975)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.M. Hjortnaes, Overføring av rekken \({\sum \nolimits }_{k=1}^{\infty }\left (1/{k}^{3}\right )\) til et bestemt integral, in Proceedings of the Twelfth Scandanavian Mathematical Congress, Lund, 10–15 Aug 1953 (Scandanavian Mathematical Society, Lund, 1954), pp. 211–213Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Kanemitsu, H. Kumagai, M. Yoshimoto, Sums involving the Hurwitz Zeta functions. Ramanujan J. 5, 5–19 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Kanemitsu, H. Kumagai, H.M. Srivastava, M. Yoshimoto, Some integral and asymptotic formulas associated with the Hurwitz Zeta function. Appl. Math. Comput. 154, 641–664 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.A. Kilbas, H.M. Srivastava, J.J. Trujillo, Theory and Applications of Fractional Differential Equations. North-Holland Mathematical Studies, vol. 204 (Elsevier (North-Holland) Science Publishers, Amsterdam/London/New York, 2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S.-D. Lin, H.M. Srivastava, Some families of the Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta functions and associated fractional derivative and other integral representations. Appl. Math. Comput. 154, 725–733 (2004)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    S.-D. Lin, H.M. Srivastava, P.-Y. Wang, Some expansion formulas for a class of generalized Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta functions. Integral Transform Spec. Funct. 17, 817–827 (2006)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Magnus, F. Oberhettinger, R.P. Soni, Formulas and Theorems for the Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Third Enlarged Edition, Die Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften in Einzeldarstellungen mit besonderer Berücksichtingung der Anwendungsgebiete, Bd. 52 (Springer, New York, 1966)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    A.M. Mathai, R.K. Saxena, H.J. Haubold, The H-Function : Theory and Applications (Springer, New York/Dordrecht/Heidelberg/London, 2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Nash, D. O’Connor, Ray-Singer torsion, topological field theories and the Riemann Zeta function at \(s\,=\,3\), in Low-Dimensional Topology and Quantum Field Theory (Proceedings of a NATO Advanced Research Workshop held at the Isaac Newton Institute at Cambridge, September 6–12, 1992), ed. by H. Osborn (Plenum Press, New York/London, 1993), pp. 279–288Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    C. Nash, D. O’Connor, Determinants of Laplacians, the Ray-Singer torsion on lens spaces and the Riemann Zeta function. J. Math. Phys. 36, 1462–1505 (1995)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Nishimoto, C.-E Yen, M.-L. Lin, Some integral forms for a generalized Zeta function. J. Fract. Calc. 22, 91–97 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    F.W.J. Olver, D.W. Lozier, R.F. Boisvert, C.W. Clark (eds.), NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions [With 1 CD-ROM (Windows, Macintosh and UNIX)] (U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC., 2010; Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/London/New York, 2010) (see also [1])Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    D. Răducanu, H.M. Srivastava, A new class of analytic functions defined by means of a convolution operator involving the Hurwitz-Lerch Zeta function. Integral Transform Spec. Funct. 18, 933–943 (2007)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    V. Ramaswami, Notes on Riemann’s \(\zeta \)-function. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 9, 165–169 (1934)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    S.G. Samko, A.A. Kilbas, O.I. Marichev, Fractional Integrals and Derivatives : Theory and Applications, Translated from the Russian: Integrals and Derivatives of Fractional Order and Some of Their Applications (“Nauka i Tekhnika”, Minsk, 1987) (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Reading/Tokyo/Paris/Berlin/Langhorne (Pennsylvania), 1993)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Sharma, R. Jain, A note on a generalzed M-series as a special function of fractional calculus. Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 12, 449–452 (2009)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    H.M. Srivastava, A unified presentation of certain classes of series of the Riemann Zeta function. Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma (Ser. 4) 14, 1–23 (1988)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    H.M. Srivastava, Sums of certain series of the Riemann Zeta function. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 134, 129–140 (1988)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    H.M. Srivastava, Further series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\), Appl. Math. Comput. 97, 1–15 (1998)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    H.M. Srivastava, Some rapidly converging series for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\). Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 127, 385–396 (1999)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    H.M. Srivastava, Some simple algorithms for the evaluations and representations of the Riemann Zeta function at positive integer arguments. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 246, 331–351 (2000)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    H.M. Srivastava, Some formulas for the Bernoulli and Euler polynomials at rational arguments. Math. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 129, 77–84 (2000)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    H.M. Srivastava, J. Choi, Series Associated with the Zeta and Related Functions (Kluwer, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 2001)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    H.M. Srivastava, P.W. Karlsson, Multiple Gaussian Hypergeometric Series (Halsted Press (Ellis Horwood Limited, Chichester), Wiley, New York/Chichester/Brisbane/Toronto, 1985)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    H.M. Srivastava, H. Tsumura, A certain class of rapidly convergent series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\). J. Comput. Appl. Math. 118, 323–335 (2000)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    H.M. Srivastava, H. Tsumura, New rapidly convergent series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\), \(L\left (2n,\chi \right )\) and \(L\left (2n + 1,\chi \right )\). Math. Sci. Res. Hot-Line 4(7), 17–24 (2000) (Research Announcement)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    H.M. Srivastava, H. Tsumura, Inductive construction of rapidly convergent series representations for \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\). Int. J. Comput. Math. 80, 1161–1173 (2003)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H.M. Srivastava, K.C. Gupta, S.P. Goyal, The H-Functions of One and Two Variables with Applications (South Asian Publishers, New Delhi/Madras, 1982)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    H.M. Srivastava, M.L. Glasser, V.S. Adamchik, Some definite integrals associated with the Riemann Zeta function. Z. Anal. Anwend. 19, 831–846 (2000)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    H.M. Srivastava, S.-D. Lin, P.-Y. Wang, Some fractional-calculus results for the \(\overline{H}\)-function associated with a class of Feynman integrals. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 13, 94–100 (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    H.M. Srivastava, M. Garg, S. Choudhary, A new generalization of the Bernoulli and related polynomials. Russ. J. Math. Phys. 17, 251–261 (2010)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    H.M. Srivastava, M. Garg, S. Choudhary, Some new families of generalized Euler and Genocchi polynomials. Taiwan. J. Math. 15, 283–305 (2011)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    H.M. Srivastava, R.K. Saxena, T.K. Pogány, R. Saxena, Integral and computational representations of the extended Hurwitz–Lerch Zeta function. Integral Transform Spec. Funct. 22, 487–506 (2011)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    E.C. Titchmarsh, The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function (Oxford University (Clarendon) Press, Oxford/London, 1951); Second Edition (Revised by D. R. Heath-Brown), 1986Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    F.G. Tricomi, Sulla somma delle inverse delle terze e quinte potenze dei numeri naturali. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Cl. Sci. Fis. Mat. Natur. (Ser. 8) 47, 16–18 (1969)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    H. Tsumura, On evaluation of the Dirichlet series at positive integers by q-calculation. J. Number Theory 48, 383–391 (1994)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    E.T. Whittaker, G.N. Watson, A Course of Modern Analysis: An Introduction to the General Theory of Infinite Processes and of Analytic Functions; with an Account of the Principal Transcendental Functions, 4th edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/London/New York, 1927)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    E. Witten, On quantum gauge theories in two dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. 141, 153–209 (1991)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    C.-E Yen, M.-L. Lin, K. Nishimoto, An integral form for a generalized Zeta function. J. Fract. Calc. 22, 99–102 (2002)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    N.-Y. Zhang, K.S. Williams, Some series representations of \(\zeta \left (2n + 1\right )\). Rocky Mt. J. Math. 23, 1581–1592 (1993)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    N.-Y. Zhang, K.S. Williams, Some infinite series involving the Riemann Zeta function, in Analysis, Geometry and Groups: A Riemann Legacy Volume, Parts I and II ed. by H.M. Srivastava, Th. M. Rassias, Part II, (Hadronic Press, Palm Harbor, 1993), pp. 691–712Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    N.-Y. Zhang, K.S. Williams, Values of the Riemann Zeta function and integrals involving \(\log (2\,\sinh \frac{\theta } {2})\) and \(\log (2\,\sin \frac{\theta } {2})\). Pac. J. Math. 168, 271–289 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations