Adaptation Model for PCMAT – Mathematics Collaborative Learning Platform

  • Marta Fernandes
  • Constantino Martins
  • Luiz Faria
  • Paulo Couto
  • Cristiano Valente
  • Cristina Bastos
  • Fátima Costa
  • Eurico Carrapatoso
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 156)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an adaptation model for an Adaptive Educational Hypermedia System, PCMAT. The adaptation of the application is based on progressive self-assessment (exercises, tasks, and so on) and applies the constructivist learning theory and the learning styles theory. Our objective is the creation of a better, more adequate adaptation model that takes into account the complexities of different users.

Keywords

Adaptive Educational Hypermedia Adaptation Model Learning Objects 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benyon, D.: Adaptive systems: A solution to Usability Problems. Journal of User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 3(1), 1–22 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Branco, A., Silva, J.: Evaluating Solutions for the Rapid Development of State-of-the-Art POS Taggers for Portuguese. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), pp. 507–510. ELRA, Paris (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown, E., Fisher, T., Brailsford, T.: Real Users, Real Results: Examining the Limitations of Learning Styles within AEH. In: Proc. 18th Conf. Hypertext and Hypermedia, pp. 57–66 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction. Ten Year Anniversary Issue 11(1/2), 87–110 (2001); Kobsa, A. (ed.) MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 3–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chepegin, V., Aroyo, L., De Bra, P., Heckman, D.: User Modeling for Modular Adaptive Hypermedia. In: SWEL 2004 Workshop at the AH 2004 Conference. TU/e Computing Science Report 04-19, pp. 366–371 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Couto, P., Martins, C., Faria, L., Fernandes, M., Carrapatoso, E.: PCMAT Metadata Authoring Tool. In: International Symposium on Computational Intelligence for Engineering Systems, ISCIES 2011 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Bra, P.: Web-based educational hypermedia. In: Romero, C., Ventura, S. (eds.) Data Mining in E-Learning, pp. 3–17. Universidad de Cordoba, WIT Press, Spain (2006) ISBN 1-84564-152-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Bra, P., Aroyo, L., Chepegin, V.: The Next Big Thing: Adaptive Web-Based Systems. Journal of Digital Information 5(1), Article No. 247 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fleming, N.D.: VARK ‘A review of those who are multimodal’ (2007), http://www.vark-learn.com/english/page_content/multimodality.html (accessed on October 1, 2011)
  11. 11.
    Hargreaves, D., et al.: About learning: Report of the Learning Working Group. Demos (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kolb, A., et al.: Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(2), 193–212 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Language Resources and Technology for Portuguese, http://lxcenter.di.fc.ul.pt/
  14. 14.
    Martins, C., Faria, L., Carrapatoso, E.: Constructivist Approach for an Educational Adaptive Hypermedia Tool. In: The 8th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2008). University of Cantabria, Santander (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martins, C., Couto, P., Fernandes, M., Bastos, C., Lobo, C., Faria, L., Carrapatoso, E.: PCMAT – Mathematics Collaborative Learning Platform. In: Pérez, J.B., Corchado, J.M., Moreno, M.N., Julián, V., Mathieu, P., Canada-Bago, J., Ortega, A., Caballero, A.F. (eds.) Highlights in PAAMS. AISC, vol. 89, pp. 93–100. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Miller, P.: Learning styles: the multimedia of the mind. Educational Resources Information Center ED 451 140 (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montgomery, S., Groat, L.N.: Student Learning Styles and Their Implications for Teaching. Occasional Paper, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching. University of Michigan (1998), http://www.crlt.umich.edu/publinks/CRLT_no10.pdf (accessed September 26, 2011)
  18. 18.
    OECD: PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading. Mathematics and Science, vol. I (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    OECD: PISA 2009 Results: Learning Trends: Changes in Student Performance Since 2000, vol. V (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Richmond, A.S., Cummings, R.: Implementing Kolb’s learning styles into online distance education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 1(1), 45–54 (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ritu, D., Sugata, M.: Learning Styles and Perceptions of Self. International Education Journal 1(1) (1999)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stahl, S.A.: Different strokes for different folks? In: Abbeduto, L. (ed.) Taking Sides: Clashing on Controversial Issues in Educational Psychology, pp. 98–107. McGraw-Hill, Guilford (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group, http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/lex-parser.shtml
  24. 24.
    Triantafillou, E., Pomportsis, A., Demetriadis, S.: The design and the formative evaluation of an adaptive educational system based on cognitive styles. Computers &Education 41, 87–103 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu, H., Houben, G.J., De Bra, P.: User Modeling in Adaptive Hypermedia Applications. In: Proceedings of the "Interdisciplinary Conferentie Informatiewetenschap", Amsterdam, pp. 10–21 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Fernandes
    • 1
  • Constantino Martins
    • 1
  • Luiz Faria
    • 1
  • Paulo Couto
    • 1
  • Cristiano Valente
    • 1
  • Cristina Bastos
    • 1
  • Fátima Costa
    • 1
  • Eurico Carrapatoso
    • 2
  1. 1.GECAD – Knowledge Engineering and Decision Support Group Institute of EngineeringPolytechnic of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations