Advertisement

Improving the Quality of the Personalized Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Approach Employing Folksonomy Method

Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 149)

Abstract

Popular E-commerce systems such as Amazon and eBay require customer personal data to be stored on their servers for serving these customers with personalized recommendations. Collaborative filtering is one of the most successful technologies for building personalized recommender systems, and is extensively used in many personalized E-commerce systems. However, existing collaborative filtering algorithms have been suffering from data sparsity and scalability problems which lead to inaccuracy of recommendation. With the increase of customers and commodities, the customer rating data is extremely sparse, which leads to the low efficient collaborative filtering E-commerce recommendation system. To address these issues, many approaches of processing no-rated items in collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm have been proposed. In order to improve the quality of the personalized collaborative filtering recommendation, an item-based collaborative filtering approach employing folksonomy method is given. The approach uses the folksonomy technology to fill the no-rated items in the collaborative filtering recommendation algorithm.

Keywords

collaborative filtering personalized recommendation folksonomy sparsity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gong, S.: A Personalized Recommendation Algorithm on Integration of Item Semantic Similarity and Item Rating Similarity. Journal of Computers 6(5), 1047–1054 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang, Q.-H., Ouyang, W.-M.: Fuzzy collaborative filtering with multiple agents. Journal of Shanghai University (English Edition) 11(3), 290–295 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gong, S.: Privacy-preserving Collaborative Filtering based on Randomized Perturbation Techniques and Secure Multiparty Computation. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology 3(4), 89–99 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dotsika, F.: Uniting formal and informal descriptive power: Reconciling ontologies with folksonomies. International Journal of Information Management (29), 407–415 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kome, S.H.: Hierarchical subject relationships in folksonomies. Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, vol. (11) (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Meo, P., Quattrone, G., Ursino, D.: Exploitation of semantic relationships and hierarchical data structures to support a user in his annotation and browsing activities in folksonomies. Information System 34, 511–535 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen, W.-H., Cai, Y., Leung, H.-F., Li, Q.: Generating ontologies with basic level concepts from folksonomies. In: International Conference on Computational Science, ICCS (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gruber, T.: Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges. AIS SIGSEMIS Bulletin (2), 3–4 (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Degemmis, M., Lops, P., Semeraro, G.: A content-collaborative recommender that exploits WordNet-based user profiles for neighborhood formation. User Model User.-Adap. Inter. 17, 217–255 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, L., Liu, L., Li, X.: A hybrid collaborative filtering method for multiple-interests and multiple-content recommendation in E-Commerce. Expert Systems with Applications 28, 67–77 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herlocker, J.: Understanding and Improving Automated Collaborative Filtering Systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Science Dept., University of Minnesota (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zhejiang Business Technology InstituteNingboChina

Personalised recommendations