From ‘Securitization’ of Climate Change to ’Climatization‘ of the Security Field: Comparing Three Theoretical Perspectives

Chapter

Abstract

Since 2003, climate change has been articulated as a threat to national, international, and human security in scientific publications and political declarations. What does the articulation of climate change as a security issue mean in terms of policy implications? How is climate change being rendered governable as a security issue and what are the consequences of this? In this chapter, three theoretical perspectives are introduced that shed light on this question: the Copenhagen School, the human security perspective, and the Paris School. These three schools all offer theoretical perspectives on the question of what it means (or should mean) to render something governable as a security issue and whether or not this is desirable. As well as being those most discussed in the literature, these three schools also cover the full spectrum of positions on the issue: against securitization, for securitization, and neutral (it depends).

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett J. The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London: Zed Books; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett J, Adger WN. Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Political Geography. 2007;26:639–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, Jon; Matthew, Richard A.; O’Brien, Karen, 2010: “Global Environmental Change and Human Security: An introduction”, in: Matthew, Richard A.; Barnett, Jon; McDonald, Bryan; O’Brien, Karen (Eds.): Global Environmental Change and Human Security (London: MIT Press): 3–32.Google Scholar
  4. Beck S. Das Klimaexperiment und der IPCC: Schnittstellen zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik in den internationalen Beziehungen. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag; 2009.Google Scholar
  5. Bigo, Didier, 2007: “Detention of Foreigners, States of Exception, and the Social Practices of Control of the Banopticon”, in: Rajaram, Prem Kumar; Grundy-Warr, Carl (Eds.): Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge (Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press): 3–33.Google Scholar
  6. Bigo, Didier, 2008a: “Security: A field left fallow”, in: Dillon, Michael; Neal, Andrew (Eds.): Foucault on Politics, Security and War (Basingstoke: Palgrave): 93–114.Google Scholar
  7. Bigo, Didier, 2008b: “Globalized (in)security: the field and the Banopticon”, in: Bigo, Didier; Tsoukala, Anastassia (Ed.): Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11 (London: Routledge): 10–48.Google Scholar
  8. Bigo D, Guild E. “La mise à l’écart des étrangers. La logique du visa Schengen” [The Exclusion of Foreigners: The Logic of the Schengen Visa]. Cultures & Conflits. 2003;49:38–70.Google Scholar
  9. Bonelli L. “Un ennemi anonyme et sans visage” [An Invisible, Faceless Enemy]. Cultures & Conflits. 2005;58:131–154.Google Scholar
  10. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2009: “Securitizing Global Environmental Change”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; KameriMbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, human, energy, food, health and water security concepts, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace 4 (Berlin: Springer): 65–104.Google Scholar
  11. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2009a: “Human Security Concepts in Policy and Science”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; KameriMbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krummenacher, Heinz (Eds.): Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, human, energy, food, health and water security concepts, Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace 4 (Berlin: Springer): 973–998.Google Scholar
  12. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “The Environmental Dimension of Human Security: Freedom from hazard impacts”, Background Paper submitted to the Informal Thematic Debate of the 65th Session of the United Nations General Assembly on Human Security, 14th April 2011; at: <http://www.afes-press-books.de/html/PDFs/Brauch_UN-GA_Paper_12%204% 202011_final%20(2).pdf>.
  13. Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula, 2011: “Introduction: Coping with Global Environmental Change in the Anthropocene”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; KameriMbote, Patricia; Chourou, Bechir; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.), 2011: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security –Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace vol. 5 (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 31–60.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, Oli; Hammill, Anne; McLeman, Robert, 2007: “Climate Change as the ‘New’ Security Threat: Implications for Africa”, in: International Affairs, 83,6: 1141–1154.Google Scholar
  15. Brzoska, Michael, 2010: “Climate Change as a Driver of Security Culture”, Paper for the 7th Pan-European International Relations Conference Politics in Hard Times: International Relations Responses to the Financial Crisis, Stockholm, 9–11 September.Google Scholar
  16. Buhaug, Halvard, 2010: “Climate Not to Blame for African Civil Wars”, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 107,38: 16477–16482.Google Scholar
  17. Burke, Marshall B.; Miguel, Edward; Satyanath, Shanker; Dykema, John A.; Lobell, David B., 2009: “Warming Increases the Risk of Civil War in Africa”, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106,49: 20670–20674.Google Scholar
  18. Buzan, Barry, 11983, 21991: People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post Cold War Era (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  19. Buzan B. The United States and the Great Powers. London: Polity; 2004.Google Scholar
  20. Buzan B, Wæver O. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Buzan B, Waever O, de Wilde J. Security: A new framework for analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Carvalho, Anabela; Burgess, Jacquelin, 2005: “Cultural Circuits of Climate Change in U.K. Broadsheet Newspapers, 1985–2003”, in: Risk Analysis, 25,6: 1457–1469.Google Scholar
  23. CNA [Center for Naval Analysis Corporation],. National Security and the Threat of Climate Change (Alexandria. VA: CNA Corporation); 2007.Google Scholar
  24. Collier, Paul, 2000: “Doing Well Out of War: An Economic Perspective”, in: Berdal, Mats, Malone, David M. (Eds.): Greed and Grievance: Economic Agendas in Civil Wars (Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner): 91–112.Google Scholar
  25. Commission on Human Security,, editor. Human Security Now. New York: Commission on Human Security; 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Council of the European Union, 2007: “Brussels European Council 21/22 June 2007 Presidency Conclusions”, Brussels, 11177/07 Rev. 1, Concl. 2.Google Scholar
  27. Council of the European Union, 2008a: “Report from the Commission and the Secretary-General/High Representative: Climate change and international security”, Brussels, 7249/08.Google Scholar
  28. Council of the European Union, 2008b: “Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy: Providing security in a changing world”, Brussels, CL08-237EN.Google Scholar
  29. Dalby S. Security and Environmental Change. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  30. Detraz, Nicole; Betsill, Michelle, 2009: “Climate Change and Environmental Security: For whom the discourse shifts”, in: International Studies Perspectives, 10,3: 303–320.Google Scholar
  31. Deudney D. The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security. Millennium. 1990;19:461–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Duffield M. Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  33. Duffield M, Waddell N. Securing Humans in a Dangerous World. International Politics. 2006;43:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Elbe S. Virus Alert: Security, governmentality and the AIDS pandemic. New York: Columbia University Press; 2009.Google Scholar
  35. Floyd R. Towards a Consequentialist Evaluation of Security: Bringing together the Copenhagen and the Welsh Schools of security studies. Review of International Studies. 2007a;33:327–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Floyd R. Human Security and the Copenhagen School’s Securitization Approach: Conceptualizing human security as a securitizing move. Human Security Journal. 2007b;5:38–49.Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, Michel, 1982: “Afterword: The subject and power”, in: Dreyfus, Hubert L.; Rabinow, Paul (Eds.): Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press): 208–225.Google Scholar
  38. Foucault M. Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978. New York: Picador; 2007.Google Scholar
  39. GECHS [Global Environmental Change and Human Security Project]. Global Environmental Change and Human Security: GECHS science plan. Bonn: IHDP; 1999.Google Scholar
  40. GEF [Global Environment Facility], 2009a: “Financing Adaptation Action”; at: <http://www.gefweb.org/interior_right.aspx?id=21584> (1 October 2009).
  41. GEF [Global Environment Facility], 2009b: “Report of the GEF to the Fifteenth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”; at: <http://www.gefweb.org/interior_right.aspx?id=234> (2 October 2009).
  42. Hajer MA. The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  43. Hanon JP. “Les coopérations policières aux frontières Schengen germano-tchèque et germano-polonaise” [Police Cooperation at the German-Czech and German-Polish Schengen Borders]. Les cahiers de la sécurité intérieure. 2000;41:18.Google Scholar
  44. Hartmann, Betsy, 2010: “Rethinking Climate Refugees and Climate Conflict: Rhetoric, reality and the politics of policy discourse”, in: Journal of International Development, 22,2: 233–246.Google Scholar
  45. Homer-Dixon, Thomas, 1994: “Environmental Scarcities and Violent Conflict: Evidence from cases”, in: International Security, 19,1: 5–40.Google Scholar
  46. Homer-Dixon T. Environment, Scarcity and Violence (Princeton. NJ: Princeton University Press); 1999.Google Scholar
  47. Huysmans, Jef, 2000: “Migration and the Politics of Security”, in: Body-Gendrot, Sophie; Martiniello, Marco (Eds.): Minorities in European Cities: The Dynamics of Social Integration and Social Exclusion at the Neighbourhood Level (London: Macmillan): 179–189.Google Scholar
  48. Huysmans J. The Politics of Insecurity. London: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
  49. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change]. “Chapter Outline of the Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5)”, IPCC_XXXI/Doc.20, Rev.1, 28 October 2009. Geneva: IPCC Secretariat; 2009.Google Scholar
  50. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], 2010: “Working Group II, Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Special Report Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation”; at: <http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/ AR5/extremessr/index.html> (4 February 2010).
  51. Jakobeit C, Methmann C. Klimaflüchtlinge: Die verleugnete Katastrophe. A report prepared for Greenpeace. Hamburg: Greenpeace Germany; 2007.Google Scholar
  52. Jones, Richard Wyn, 1995: “Message in a Bottle? Theory and Praxis in Critical Security Studies”, in: Contemporary Security Policy, 16,3: 299–319.Google Scholar
  53. Kaplan, Robert, 1994: “The Coming Anarchy: How scarcity, crime, overpopulation, tribalism, and disease are rapidly destroying the social fabric of our planet”, in: The Atlantic Monthly, 273,2: 44–76.Google Scholar
  54. Kolmannskog VO. Future Floods of Refugees: A comment on climate change, conflict and forced migration. Oslo: Norwegian Refugee Council; 2008.Google Scholar
  55. McCormack T. Critique, Security and Power: The political limits to emancipatory approaches. London: Routledge; 2010.Google Scholar
  56. McDonald, Matt. 2008: “Securitization and the Construction of Security”, in: European Journal of International Relations, 14,4: 563–587.Google Scholar
  57. McNamara K, Elizabeth; Gibson, Chris,. We Do Not Want to Leave our Land’: Pacific ambassadors at the United Nations resist the category of ‘climate refugees. Geoforum. 2009;40:475–483.Google Scholar
  58. McSweeney, Bill, 1996: “Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School”, in: Review of International Studies 22,1: 81–93.Google Scholar
  59. Methmann, Chris, 2009: “'Climate Protection' as Empty Signifier: A discourse theoretical perspective on climate mainstreaming in world politics”, in: Millennium, 39,2: 345–372.Google Scholar
  60. Miguel, Edward; Satyanath, Shanker; Sergenti, Ernest, 2004: “Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An instrumental variables approach”, in: Journal of Political Economy, 112,4: 725–753.Google Scholar
  61. Myers, Norman, 1995: Environmental Exodus: An Emergent crisis in the global arena (Washington D.C.: The Climate Institute).Google Scholar
  62. Nordas, Ragnhild; Gleditsch, Nils Petter, 2007: “Climate Change and Conflict”, in: Political Geography, 26,6: 627–638.Google Scholar
  63. Oels, Angela, 2005: “Rendering Climate Change Governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government?”, in: Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7,3: 185–207.Google Scholar
  64. Oels, Angela, 2009a: “The Securitization of Climate Change: Does the Copenhagen School miss the point?”, manuscript in peer review, University of Hamburg.Google Scholar
  65. Oels, Angela, 2009b: “The ‘Vulnerable’ as ‘Becoming Dangerous’: The relevance of a Foucaultian framework for studying the ‘securitization’ of climate change”, Paper prepared for the international conference “Climate Change, Social Stress and Violent Conflict: State of the art and research needs” hosted by KlimaCampus, Hamburg University, Germany, 19–20 November.Google Scholar
  66. Oels, Angela; Carvalho, Anabela, 2011: “Wer hat Angst vor ‘Klimaflüchtlingen’? Wie die mediale und politische Konstruktion des Klimawandels den politischen Handlungsspielraum strukturiert”, in: Neverla, Irene; Schäfer, Mike (Eds.) Klimawandel in den Medien (Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften) forthcoming.Google Scholar
  67. Oels, Angela, 2012: “Rendering Climate Change Governable by Risk: From probability to contingency”, in: GEOFORUM, themed issue on Natures of Risk, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  68. Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “Coping with Global Environmental Change – Sustainability Revolution and Sustainable Peace”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Ursula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Chourou, Bechir; Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.), 2011: Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security –Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace vol. 5 (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 1487–1504.Google Scholar
  69. Schwartz P, Randall D. An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and its Implications for United States National Security (Washington. Environmental Media Services): D.C; 2003.Google Scholar
  70. Schweller, Randall L., 1999: “Fantasy Theory”, in: Review of International Studies, 25,1: 147–150.Google Scholar
  71. Stern N. [2006]: The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  72. Stripple, Johannes, 2002: “Climate as a Security Issue”, in: Page, Edward; Redclift, Michael (Eds.): Human Security and the Environment: International comparisons (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar): 105–127.Google Scholar
  73. Stritzel, Holger, 2007: “Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and beyond”, in: European Journal of International Relations, 13,3: 357–383.Google Scholar
  74. Tsoukala A. “Les nouvelles politiques de controle du hooliganisme en Europe: de la fusion sécuritaire au multipositionnement de la menace” [The New Policies of Controlling Hooliganism in Europe: From the Fusion of Security to the Multi-Positioning of Threats]. Cultures & Conflits. 2004;51:83–96.Google Scholar
  75. Trombetta, Maria Julia, 2008: “Environmental Security and Climate Change: Analysing the discourse”, in: Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21,4: 585–602.Google Scholar
  76. Trombetta, Maria Julia, 2011: “Rethinking the Securitization of the Environment: Old beliefs, new insights”, in: Balzacq, Thierry (Ed.): Securitization Theory: How security problems emerge and dissolve (London: Routledge): 135–149.Google Scholar
  77. UNDP [United Nations Development Programme]. Human Development Report. Nairobi: UNDP; 1994.Google Scholar
  78. UNFCC [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change], 2009: “Copenhagen Accord”; at: <http://www.unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/11a01.pdf#page=4> (28 November 2010).
  79. UNGA [United Nations, General Assembly]. “Climate Change and its Possible Security Implications: Report of the Secretary-General”, A/64/350. New York: UN; 2009.Google Scholar
  80. UNSC [United Nations Security Council]. Minutes of 5663rd meeting, S/PV.5663, 17 April. New York: UN; 2007a.Google Scholar
  81. UNSC [United Nations Security Council]. Minutes of 5663rd meeting, New York, S/PV.5663 (Resumption 1), 17 April, 3 p.m. New York: UN; 2007b.Google Scholar
  82. Wæver, Ole, 1995: “Securitization and Desecuritization”, in: Lipschutz, Ronnie D. (Ed.): On Security (New York: Columbia University Press): 46–86.Google Scholar
  83. Wæver, Ole, 1999: “Securitizing Sectors? Reply to Eriksson”, in: Cooperation and Conflict 34,3: 334–340.Google Scholar
  84. Wæver, Ole, 2000: “The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post sovereign security orders”, in: Kelstrup, Morten; Williams, Michael C. (Eds.): International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration (London: Routledge): 250–294.Google Scholar
  85. Wagner, Jürgen, 2008: “Die Versicherheitlichung des Klimawandels: Wie Brüssel die Erderwärmung für die Militarisierung der Europäischen Union instrumentalisiert”, in: Informationsstelle Militarisierung, June: 14–16.Google Scholar
  86. WBGU [German Advisory Council on Global Change], 2008: World in Transition: Climate change as a security risk (London: Earthscan); at: <http://www.wbgu.de/wbgu_jg2007_ engl.html> (3 March 2009).
  87. Weingart P, Engels A, Pansegrau P. Risks of Communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science. 2000;9:261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations