International Climate Change Policies: The Potential Relevance of REDD+ For Peace and Stability

  • Dennis Tänzler
  • Felix Ries
Part of the Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace book series (HSHES, volume 8)


The debate on climate change as a threat to peace and stability has gained some momentum in recent years. In particular, the fourth assessment report published by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) triggered a surge of interest in the potential security implications of climate change.


Forest Owner Climate Change Policy Forest Sector Violent Conflict International Climate Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agrawal, Arun; Angelsen, Arild, 2009: “Using community forest management to achieve REDD+ goals”, in: Angelsen, Arild (Ed.): Realising REDD+ National strategy and policy options (Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research): 201–212.Google Scholar
  2. Brzoska, Michael, 2008: “Der konfliktträchtige Klimawandel – ein Sicherheitsproblem? ”, in: Andreas Heinemann-Grüder; Hippler, Jochen; Weingardt, Markus; Mutz, Reinhard; Schoch, Bruno (Eds.): Friedensgutachten 2008 (Münster: LIT): 195–206.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, Kurt M.; Gulledge, Jay; McNeill, J.R.; Podesta, John; Ogden, Peter; Fuerth, Leon; Woolsey, R. James; Lennon, Alexander T.J.; Smith, Julianne; Weitz, Richard; Mix, Derek, 2007: The Age of Consequences: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Global Climate Change (Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies); at: <> (24 March 2008).
  4. Carius, Alexander; Tänzler, Dennis; Maas, Achim, 2008: Climate Change and Security – Challenges for German Development Cooperation. (Eschborn: GTZ).Google Scholar
  5. CNA Corporation, 2007: National Security and the Threat of Climate Change (Alexandria, VA: CNA Corporation); at: <> (30 July 2007).
  6. Cotula L, Mayers J. Tenure in REDD – Start-point or afterthought? Natural Resource Issues No. 15. London: International Institute for Environment and Development; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. Dubois O. Forest-based Poverty Reduction: A Brief Review of Facts, Figures, Challenges and Possible Ways Forward (Rome. Forestry Policy and Institutions Branch): FAO; 2002.Google Scholar
  8. Gleditsch, Nils Petter; Nordås, Ragnhild, 2009: “Climate Change and Conflict. A Critical Overview”, in: Die Friedenswarte, 84,2: 11–28.Google Scholar
  9. Griffith, Tom; Martone, Francesco, 2009: Seeing ‘REDD’? Forests, climate change mitigation and the rights of indigenous peoples. Updated version (Forest Peoples Programme).Google Scholar
  10. Hatcher J. Securing Tenure Rights and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) Costs and Lessons Learned. Social Development Working Papers No. 120. Washington, DC: World Bank; 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Hirsbrunner, Simon; Tänzler, Dennis; Reuster, Lena, 2011: Important aspects of sinks for linking emission trading systems. Report commissioned on behalf of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (Berlin: German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety).Google Scholar
  12. Hobley M, Baral J, Rasaily N, Shrestha B. Nepal Swiss Community Forestry ProjectExternal Review. Prepared for Government of Nepal. Bern: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation; 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Holopainen J, Wit M, editors. Financing Sustainable Forest Management. European Tropical Forest Network News No. 49. Wageningen: Tropenbos International; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. Indonesia Ministry of Forestry. Country report on the progress and achievement toward sustainable forest management in Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia; 2002.Google Scholar
  15. IPCC. “Summary for Policymakers”, in: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Loisel C. Linkage between forest-based mitigation and GHG markets. Idées pour le débat 19. Paris: Institut du développement durable et des relations internationales; 2008.Google Scholar
  17. Mabey N. Delivering Climate Security. International Security Responses to a Climate Changed World. Whitehall Paper. New York - London: Routledge; 2008.Google Scholar
  18. OECD. State Building in Situations of Fragility. Initial Findings. Paris: OECD; 2008.Google Scholar
  19. Peskett, Leo; Brockhaus, Maria, 2009: “When REDD+ goes national: A review of realities, opportunities and challenges”, in: Angelsen, Arild (Ed.): Realising REDD+National strategy and policy options (Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research): 25–44.Google Scholar
  20. Rights and Resources Initiative, 2010: The End of the Hinterland. Forests, Conflict and Climate Change; at: <> (5 February 2011).
  21. Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Towards a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding: Getting Their Act Together. Overview Report of the Joint Utstein Study of Peacebuilding. Oslo: Royal Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs; 2004.Google Scholar
  22. Scholz I, Schmidt L. Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: meeting the main challenges ahead. Briefing Paper 6/2008. Bonn: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik/German Development Institute; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Streck, Charlotte, 2009: “Rights and REDD+: Legal and regulatory considerations”, in: Angelsen, Arild (Ed.): Realising REDD+ National strategy and policy options (Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research): 151–162.Google Scholar
  24. Tacconi, Luca; Downs; Fiona; Larmour, Peter, 2009: “Anticorruption policies in the forest sector and REDD+”, in: Angelsen, Arild (Ed.): Realising REDD+ National strategy and policy options (Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research): 163–174.Google Scholar
  25. Tänzler, Dennis; Maas, Achim; Carius, Alexander, 2010: “Climate change adaptation and peace”, in: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change, vol.,no.: pages <DOI: 10.1002/wcc.66>.
  26. United Nations General Assembly, 2009: Climate Change and its Possible Security Implications: Report of the UN Secretary-General, 11 September 2009, A/64/350; at: <> (6 November 2010).
  27. UNEP. From Conflict to Peacebuilding: The Role of Natural Resources and the Environment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme UNEP; 2009.Google Scholar
  28. UNFCCC, 2007: Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: approaches to stimulate action. Decision 2/CP 13, 3; at: <> (25 March 2011).
  29. USAID. Land & Conflict. A Toolkit for Intervention. Washington, D.C.: USAID/Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Viana, Virgilio M., 2009: Financing REDD: meshing markets with government funds. International Institute for Environment and Development Policy Brief (London: IIED); at: <> (25 March 2011).
  31. WBGU [German Advisory Council on Global Change], 2007: World in Transition: Climate Change as a Security Risk (Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer).Google Scholar
  32. White A, Martin A. Who owns the world’s forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Washington, D.C: Forest Trends & Center for International Environmental Law; 2002.Google Scholar
  33. Williams L, Goers; Larsen, Gaia; Lupberger, Sarah; Daviet, Florence; Davis; Crystal,. Getting Ready with Forest Governance: A Review of the World Bank Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Readiness Preparation Proposals and the UN-REDD National Programme Documents (Washington. World Resources Institute): D.C; 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AdelphiBerlinGermany
  2. 2.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations