Skip to main content

Policing Borders in a Time of Rapid Climate Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace ((HSHES,volume 8))

Abstract

This chapter argues that the process of securitization is already underway because of well funded and well founded concerns about internal state security and international terrorism. Security responses to climate induced migration are unlikely to be legitimated as climate security measures. They may be rather found under arcane programmes and conferences on protecting critical state infrastructure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackroyd, Carol; Margolis, Karen; Shallice, Tim; Rosenhead, Jonathan, 1977: The Technology of Political Control (Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, Graham; Kelley, Paul X., 2004: Nonlethal Weapons And Capabilities. Independent Task Force Report (New York: Council on Foreign Relations).

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, Jürgen, 2001: “Acoustic Weapons: A Prospective Assessment”, in: Science & Global Security, 9: 165–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, Jürgen, 2008: Milllimetre Waves, Lasers. Acoustics for Non-Lethal Weapons?Physics Analyses and Inferences, Forschung DSF, No. 16 (Osnabrück: Deutsche Stiftung Friedensforschung).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International, 1997: Arming The Torturers: Electro-shock Torture and the Spread of Stun Technology (London: AI); at: <http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engACT400011997 >.

  • Amnesty International, 1999: Cruelty in Control? The Stun Belt and Other Electro-Shock Equipment in Law Enforcement (London: AI); at: <http://www.amnestyusa.org/arms_trade/document.do?id=5E287F135521DB378025690000692C81 http://www.amnestyusa.org/arms_trade/document.do?id=5E287F135521DB378025690000692C81 >.

  • Amnesty International, 1999–2003: The Terror Trade Times (London: AI); at: http://www.iansa.org/issues/documents/terror_trade_times4.pdf > (7 February 2011).

  • Amnesty International, 2003: The Pain Merchants Security equipment and its use in torture and other ill-treatment (London: AI); at: <http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGACT400082003 > (7 February 2011).

  • Amnesty International, USA, 2004: Excessive and lethal force? Amnesty International’s concerns about deaths and ill treatment involving police use of tasers. Index No. AMR 51/139/2004 (Washington, DC: Amnesty International, 30 November).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International; Omega Foundation, 2010: From Words Into Deeds: Making the EU Ban on Trade in the Tools of Torture A Reality (London: Amnesty International, March); at: <http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR01/004/2010/en > (7 February 2011)

  • ASD Reports, 2009: Global Homeland Security (2009–2018); at: <http://www.asdreports.com/shopexd.asp?ID-1442 > (7 February 2011).

  • BMA, 2007: The Use of drugs as weapons: The concerns and responsibilities of healthcare professionals (London: BMA Board of Science, May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, Robert, J., 1997: Non-Lethal Weapons, Terms and References. INSS Occasional Paper 15 (Colorado Springs, CO: USAF, US. Airforce Academy, Institute for National Security Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, Edward, 1997: A Safer Future – Reducing the Human Costs of War (Oxford: Oxfam).

    Google Scholar 

  • CAJ (Campaign for the Administration of Justice), 1998: Plastic Bullets: A Briefing Paper, highlighting the case for banning plastic bullets including the problems with guidelines for their use and the lack of accountability (Belfast: CAJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey-Maslen, Stuart (Ed.), 2010: Non-kinetic-energy weapons termed 'non-lethal'A Preliminary Assessment under International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law (Geneva: Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights [AdH]); at: http://www.adh-geneve.ch/docs/projets/Non-Kinetic-EnergyOctober2010.pdf(7 February 2011).

  • Council For Science & Society(CSS), 1978: Harmless Weapons (London: Barry Rose Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, Robin, 1997: Criteria for Judging Excessively Harmful Weapons and Weapons Which Cause ‘ Superfluous Injury and Unnecessary Suffering, SIrUS project (Geneva: ICRC Health Division).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromwell, David; Levene, Mark (Eds.), 2007: Surviving Climate Change: The Struggle To Avert Global Catastrophe (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, Michael, 2009: Dangerous Ambiguities:Regulation of Riot Control Agents and Incapacitants Under The Chemical Weapons Convention, Bradford Non-Lethal Weapons Research Project (Bradford, U.K: University of Bradford, September).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, Malcom, 1996: A New Form of Warfare-The Rise of Non-Lethal Weapons, Brasseys, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dando, Malcom, 2002 Future Incapacitating Chemical Agents:The Impact of Genomics, in Lewer, Nick, (2002) : The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass): 167–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, Neil, 2009: “Non-Lethal” Weapons (Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, Daniel, G., 2003: Storm Before the Calm: Can Knockout Gases Really be Nonlethal?, in: Scientific American, 288,2 (February): 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fidler, David, P., 2002: “Non-Lethal Weapons and International Law: Three Perspectives on the Future”, in: Lewer, Nick (Ed.), 2002: The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass): 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Lisa, 2009: “Climate Change Makes Refugees in Bangladesh”, in: Scientific American, 3 March; at: <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=climate-change-refugees-bangladesh X>.

  • Graham, Stephen, 2010: Cities Under Siege – The New Military Urbanism (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Ben, 2009: NeoConOpticon: The EU Security-Industrial Complex (Amsterdam: Transnational Institute & Statewatch); at: <http://www.web.amnesty.org/library/Index/ENGACT400041997?open&of=ENG-398 >.

  • IACP (International Association of Chiefs of Police), 2005: Electro-Muscular Disruption Technology (EMDT) A Nine Step Strategy for Effective Deployment (Alexandria, VA: IACP, April).

    Google Scholar 

  • ICRC, 2006: A Guide To the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare – Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol 1, 1977 (Geneva: ICRC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoski Joan. M.; Murray; Bosseau,W.; Kenny, John, M., 2000:The Advantages & Limitations of almatives As Non-Lethal Technique (Philadelphia, PA: The Pennsylvania University, College of Medicine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Landmine Action, 2001: Alternative Anti-Personnel landmines – The Next Generations (London: Landmine Action).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewer, Nick (Ed.), 2002: The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loye, Dominique, 2010: Potential Implications For International Humanitarian Law, Speaker’s Summary Session 4, Expert Meeting – Incapacitating Chemical Agents: Implications For International Law, Montreux, Switzerland, 24–26 March: 40–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel, Robert, 2004: Security, Strategy, and the Quest for Bloodless War (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markoff, John, 2010: “War Machines: recruiting Robots For Combat”, in: New York Times, 27 November; at: <http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/science/28robot.html > (7 February 2011).

  • Martin, Brian, 2007: Justice Ignited: the dynamics of backfire (Australia: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Brian; Wright, Steve, 2007: Looming struggles over technology for border control., in Organisational Transformation and Social Change; at. <http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/pubs/backfire.html > (7 February 2011).

  • Nordas, Ragnhild; Gledisch, Neils-.Petter, 2007: “Climate Change and Conflict”, in Political Geography, 26,6: 627–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omega Foundation, 2000: Crowd Control Technology. Options For The European Union. (An Appraisal of the Technologies Of Political Control, The Scientific and Technological Options Panel (STOA) of the European Parliament, (EP/1/1V/B/STOA/99/14/01); at: <http://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/19991401a_en.pdf > (7 February 2011).

  • Omega Foundation, 2003: Baton Rounds: A Review of the Human Rights Implications of the Introduction and Use of the L2A1 Baton Round in Northern Ireland and Proposed Alternatives to the Baton Round (Belfast: Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orbon, Sjef, 2010: “Do Non-Lethal Capabilities ‘Licence to Silence’?”, in: Journal of Military Ethics, 9,1: 78–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Alan, M.; Chevrier, Isabelle, M.; Wheelis, Mark (Eds.), 2007: Incapacitating Biochemical Weapons: Promise or Peril (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilisuk, Marc, 2008: Who Benefits from Global Violence & War (Westport, CT: Greenwood/Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Raleigh, Clionadh; Jordan, Lisa; Salehyan, Idean, 2008: Assessing the Impact of Climate Change on Migration and Conflict. Paper commissioned by the World Bank Group for the ‘Social Dimensions of Climate Change’ workshop, Washington, D.C., 5–6 March 2008, working paper; at: <http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTSOCIALDEVELOPMENT/Resources/SDCCWorkingPaper_MigrationandConflict.pdf>.

  • Randerson, J., 2006: “Stun gun makers sue experts over safety criticisms”, in: Guardian, 9 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, Brian; Wright, Steve 2000: “A Flexible Response: Assessing Non-Lethal Weapons”, in: Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 12,4: 477–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, Brian, 2002: “Towards An Understanding of Non-Lethality”, in: Lewer, Nick (Ed.), 2002: The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass): 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, Brian, 2003: Non-lethal Weapons as Legitimating Forces? (London: Frank Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, Brian, 2006: Controlling the Weapons of War: Politics, Persuasion and the Prohibition of Inhumanity (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Paul, 2002: Losing Control – Global Security in the 21st Century (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiberova, Jitka; Fusek, Josef; Kralove, Hradec, 2005: Pharmacological non-lethal weapons, paper presented to the 3rd Non-Lethal Weapons Symposium, Ettlingen, Germany, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slim, Hugo, 2007:Killing Civilians – Method, Madness and Morality in War (London: Hurst & Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, Richard; Rodin, David, 2006: The Ethics Of War – Shared problems in Different Traditions (Farnham,UK: Ashgate Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Northern Ireland Office, 1999: A Report of the Independent Commission on Policing In Northern Ireland, 1999: A New Beginning: Policing In Northern Ireland; at: http://www.nio.gov.uk/a_new_beginning_in_policing_in_northern_ireland.pdf > (7 February 2011).

  • Thomas, Mark, 2006: As Used On the Famous Nelson Mandela – Underground Adventures in the Arms & Torture Trade (London: Ebury Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, Alvin, Toffler, H.,1993: War and Anti-War: Survival at the Dawn of the 21st Century (New York: Little Brown.and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Topfer, Eric., 2010: “The German Security Rsearch programme: transfering military technology- securitising civil research”, in: Statewatch, 20,3–4: 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN ECOSOC (UN Economic and Social Council), 2004: Commission on Human Rights, Civil and Political Rights, Including the Questions of Torture & Detention – Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the question of torture, Theo van Boven, Sixty First Session, Item 11a,E/CN.4/2005/62, 15 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, Victor, 2002: “Non-Lethal Weapons: R2IPE for Arms Control Measures”, in Lewer, Nick (2002): The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law, (London: Frank Cass ): 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Steve; Arthur, Charles, 2006: “Targeting the Pain Business”, in: The Guardian 5 October; at: <http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/oct/05/guardianweeklytechnologysection > (7 February 2011)

  • Wright, Steve, 2002: “The Role of Sub-lethal Weapons in Human Rights Abuse”, in Lewer, Nick (Ed.), 2002: The Future of Non-Lethal Weapons – Technologies, Operations, Ethics and Law (London: Frank Cass): 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Steve, 2006: “A systems approach to analysing substate conflicts”, in: Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics, 35,1–2: Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley:182–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Steve, 2007: “Preparing For Mass Refugee Flows – The Corporate Military Sector”, in: Cromwell, David; Levene, Mark (Eds.), 2007: Surviving Climate Change: The Struggle To Avert Global Catastrophe (London: Pluto Press): 82–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Steve, 1998: An Appraisal of the Technology of Political Control, Scientific and Technological Options Panel (STOA) of the European Parliament, PE 166 499 (Strasbourg: STOA); at: <www.statewatch.org/news/2005/may/steve-wright-stoa-rep.pdf > (31 January 2011).

  • Zimbardo, Philip, 2007: The Lucifer Effect: How Good People Turn Evil (London: Rider Books).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Wright .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wright, S. (2012). Policing Borders in a Time of Rapid Climate Change. In: Scheffran, J., Brzoska, M., Brauch, H., Link, P., Schilling, J. (eds) Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28626-1_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics