Lifetime Improvement by Battery Scheduling
The use of mobile devices is often limited by the lifetime of their batteries. For devices that have multiple batteries or that have the option to connect an extra battery, battery scheduling, thereby exploiting the recovery properties of the batteries, can help to extend the system lifetime. Due to the complexity, work on battery scheduling in literature is limited to either small batteries or to very simple loads. In this paper, we present an approach using the Kinetic Battery Model that combines real size batteries with realistic random loads. The results show that, indeed, battery scheduling results in lifetime improvements compared to the sequential useage of the batteries. The improvements mainly depend on the ratio between the average discharge current and the battery capacity. Our results show that for realistic loads one can achieve up to 20% improvements in system lifetime by applying battery scheduling.
KeywordsDischarge Current Switching Frequency Round Robin Battery Capacity Random Load
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Benini, L., Castelli, G., Macii, A., Macii, E., Poncino, M., Scarsi, R.: Extending lifetime of portable systems by battery scheduling. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe (DATE), pp. 197–203. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2001)Google Scholar
- 3.Cloth, L., Haverkort, B.R., Jongerden, M.R.: Computing battery lifetime distributions. In: Proc. IEEE DSN 2007, pp. 780–789. IEEE Computer Society Press (2007)Google Scholar
- 4.Jongerden, M., Haverkort, B., Bohnenkamp, H., Katoen, J.P.: Maximizing system lifetime by battery scheduling. In: Proc. IEEE DSN 2009, pp. 63–72. IEEE Computer Society Press (2009)Google Scholar
- 7.Jongerden, M., Haverkort, B.: Lifetime improvement by battery scheduling. In: UK Performance Engineering Workshop, Bradford, UK, July 7-8 (2010)Google Scholar
- 9.Manwell, J., McGowan, J.: Extension of the kinetic battery model for wind/hybrid power systems. In: Proc. of the 5th European Wind Energy Association Conference (EWEC 1994), pp. 284–289 (1994)Google Scholar
- 10.Manwell, J., McGowan, J., Baring-Gould, E., Stein, W., Leotta, A.: Evaluation of battery models for wind/hybrid power system simulation. In: Proc. of the 5th European Wind Energy Association Conference (EWEC 1994), pp. 1182–1187 (1994)Google Scholar
- 11.Matsuura, Y.: Low-power consumption reference pulse generator. United States Patent 4,618,837 (1986)Google Scholar
- 12.Battery University.com (April 2010), http://www.batteryuniversity.com/partone-24.htm
- 13.Low Cost Batteries.com (April 2010), http://www.lowcostbatteries.com/articles.asp?id=107
- 14.Wolfram Mathworld Lambert-W Function (April 2010), http://mathworld.wolfram.com/lambertw-function.html
- 15.Rakhmatov, D., Vrudhula, S., Wallach, D.A.: Battery lifetime predictions for energy-aware computing. In: Proc. of the 2002 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (ISLPED 2002), pp. 154–159 (2002)Google Scholar
- 17.Sarkar, S., Adamou, M.: A framework for optimal battery management for wireless nodes. In: Proc. IEEE INFOCOM 2002, pp. 179–188 (2002)Google Scholar