Probe and Pray: Using UPnP for Home Network Measurements

  • Lucas DiCioccio
  • Renata Teixeira
  • Martin May
  • Christian Kreibich
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7192)

Abstract

Network measurement practitioners increasingly focus their interest on understanding and debugging home networks. The Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) technology holds promise as a highly efficient way to collect and leverage measurement data and configuration settings available from UPnP-enabled devices found in home networks. Unfortunately, UPnP proves less available and reliable than one would hope. In this paper, we explore the usability of UPnP as a means to measure and characterize home networks. We use data from 120,000 homes, collected with the HomeNet Profiler and Netalyzr troubleshooting suites. Our results show that in the majority of homes we could not collect any UPnP data at all, and when we could, the results were frequently inaccurate or simply wrong. Whenever UPnP-supplied data proved accurate, however, we demonstrate that UPnP provides an array of useful measurement techniques for inferring home network traffic and losses, for identifying home gateway models with configuration or implementation issues, and for obtaining ground truth on access link capacity.

Keywords

Packet Loss Home Network Access Link Download Rate Uplink Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal, B., Bhagwan, R., Das, T., Eswaran, S., Padmanabhan, V.N., Voelker, G.M.: NetPrints: Diagnosing Home Network Misconfigurations Using Shared Knowledge. In: Proc. NSDI (April 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bischof, Z.S., Otto, J.S., Sanchez, M.A., Rula, J.P., Choffnes, D.R., Bustamante, F.E.: Crowdsourcing ISP Characterization to The Network Edge. In: ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Measurements Up the Stack (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Calvert, K.L., Edwards, W.K., Feamster, N., Grinter, R.E., Deng, Y., Zhou, X.: Instrumenting Home Networks. In: ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Home Networks (August 2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chetty, M., Halsem, D., Baird, A., Ofoha, U., Summer, B., Grinter, R.E.: Why Is My Internet Slow?: Making Network Speeds Visible. In: Proc. ACM CHI (May 2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiCioccio, L., Teixeira, R., Rosenberg, C.: Impact of Home Networks on End-to-End Performance: Controlled Experiments. In: ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Home Networks (August 2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DiCioccio, L., Teixeira, R., Rosenberg, C.: Characterizing Home Networks With HomeNet Profiler. Technical Report CP-PRL-2011-09-0001, Technicolor (September 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dischinger, M., Haeberlen, A., Gummadi, K.P., Saroiu, S.: Characterizing Residential Broadband Networks. In: Proc. IMC (October 2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kreibich, C., Weaver, N., Nechaev, B., Paxson, V.: Netalyzr: Illuminating the Edge Network. In: Proc. IMC (October 2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundaresan, S., de Donato, W., Feamster, N., Teixeira, R., Crawford, S., Pescapè, A.: Broadband Internet Performance: A View From the Gateway. In: Proc. ACM SIGCOMM (August 2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    UPnP Forums. UPnP Specifications, http://www.upnp.org/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas DiCioccio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Renata Teixeira
    • 2
    • 3
  • Martin May
    • 1
  • Christian Kreibich
    • 4
  1. 1.TechnicolorFrance
  2. 2.UPMC Sorbonne UniversitesFrance
  3. 3.CNRSFrance
  4. 4.ICSIFrance

Personalised recommendations