Skip to main content

Fuzzy Cognitive Strategic Maps in Business Process Performance Measurement

  • Chapter
  • 6752 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 444))

Abstract

This paper describes a methodology for the development of a Proactive Balanced Scorecard (PBSCM). The Balanced Scorecard is one of the most popular approaches developed in the field of performance measurement. However, in spite of its reputation, there are issues that require further research. The present research addresses the problems of the Balanced Scorecard by utilizing the soft computing characteristics of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs). By using FCMs, the proposed methodology generates a dynamic network of interconnected Key Performance Indicators (KPI), simulates each KPI with imprecise relationships and quantifies the impact of each KPI to other KPIs in order to adjust targets of performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansoff, H.I.: Managing strategic surprise by response to weak signals. California Management Review XXVIII(2), 21–33 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: Structure of decision: The cognitive maps of political elites. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bititci, U.S., Turner, T., et al.: Dynamics of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(6), 692–704 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, J.: Performance Measurement: Knowing the Dynamics. Australian Accounting 68(9), 30–31 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus, A.: Modeling to predict or to learn? Productivity Press, Portland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, A.A.: The future of the balanced scorecard: An interview with Professor Dr. Robert S. Kaplan. Measuring Business Excellence 7(1), 3 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P.F.: Managing in Turbulent Times. Harper Collins Publishers (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumond, E.J.: Making best use of performance measures and information. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 14(9), 16–31 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, R.G.: Performance measurement manifesto. Harvard Business Review 69, 131–137 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J.: Use of non-financial performance measures. Journal of Cost Management 6, 31–38 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., et al.: Performance Measurement in Service Businesses. The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Flapper, S.D., Fortuin, L., et al.: Towards consistent performance management systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(7), 27–37 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerson, S.: Issues in developing a performance criteria system for an organisation. International Journal of Production Research 23(4), 639–646 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grove, A.: Only the paranoid survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company. Bantam Books (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.C., Clark, K.B.: Dynamic Manufacturing: Creating the Learning Organization. Free Press, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S.: Measuring manufacturing performance: A new challenge for managerial accounting research. The Accounting Review 58(4), 686–705 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S.: Yesterday’s accounting undermines production. Harvard Business Review 62, 95–101 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–92 (January-February 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review (January-February 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard - Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Why does business need a Balanced Scorecard? (2000), http://www.corpfinance.riag.com/

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Translating the Balanced Scorecard from Performance measurement to Strategic Management: Part 1. Accounting Horizons 15(1), 87–10 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into 19Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, D.P., Eiler, R.G., Jones, C.R.: Are your performance measures obsolete? Management Accounting (US) 70(12), 45–50 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellen, V.: Business Performance Measurement, At the Crossroads of Strategy, Decision-Making, Learning and Information Visualization (2003), http://www.kellen.net/bpm.html

  • Kelly, K.: New rules for the new economy: ten ways the network economy is changing everything. Fourth Estate, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley, M.P., Neely, A.D.: Performance measurement frameworks – a review. In: 2nd International Conference on Performance Measurement, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley, M.P., Neely, A.D.: A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement frameworks. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 22(11), 1222–1245 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B.: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 24, 65–75 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kosko, B.: Hidden patterns in combined and adaptive knowledge networks. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 2, 377–393 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, R.L., Cross, K.F.: Measure Up - The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance, London, Mandarin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, B.H.: Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing: A Model for American Companies. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, J.: Executive knowledge, models, and learning. Productivity Press, Portland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H.: Balanced Scorecard Report: Insight, experience and ideas for strategy focused organisations. Harvard Business School Publishing 4(1), 1–17 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A.: Measuring Business Performance - Why, What and How. Economist Books, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A.: The performance measurement revolution: why now and what next? International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19(2), 205 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Mills, J., et al.: Performance measurement system design: developing and testing a process-based approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(10), 1119–1145 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, P.R.: Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step. John Wiley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.N.: The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Century Business Press, London (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stylios, C.D., Groumpos, P.P., et al.: A fuzzy cognitive map approach to process control systems. J. Adv. Comput. Intell. 3, 1–9 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwignjo, P., Bititci, U.S., et al.: Quantitative models for performance measurement system. Int. J. Production Economics 64, 231–241 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takikonda, L., Takikonda, R.: We Need Dynamic Performance Measures. Management Accounting 80(3), 49–51 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Waggoner, D.B., Neely, A.D., et al.: The forces that shape organisational performance measurement systems: an interdisciplinary review. International Journal of Production Economics 60-61, 53–60 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., et al.: Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information System Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.R., Chen, S.S.: A logical architecture for cognitive maps. In: Second IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Diego, CA (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.R., Chen, S.S., et al.: Pool 2: a generic System for cognitive map development and decision analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 19, 31–39 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The Roles of Fuzzy Logic and Soft Computing in the Conception, Design and Deployment of Intelligent Systems. In: Nwana, H.S., Azarmi, N. (eds.) Software Agents and Soft Computing: Towards Enhancing Machine Intelligence. LNCS, vol. 1198, pp. 83–190. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glykas, M. (2013). Fuzzy Cognitive Strategic Maps in Business Process Performance Measurement. In: Glykas, M. (eds) Business Process Management. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 444. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28409-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28409-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28408-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28409-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics