Transcriptome to Reactome Deterministic Modeling: Validation of in Silico Simulations of Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Signaling in MG63 Osteosarcoma Cells, TTR Deterministic Modeling

  • Clyde F. Phelix
  • Bethaney Watson
  • Richard G. LeBaron
  • Greg Villareal
  • Dawnlee Roberson
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 145)

Abstract

Integrated Systems Biology was used to study bone cancer via an iterative process of in vitro testing for validation of an in silico computer simulation where the transcriptome was used to derive the parameters of a kinetic model. A computer simulation model of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β1) signaling pathway was obtained from Reactome®. The transcriptome of MG-63 cells was accessed from NCBI GEO GSE11414. With this method the model is not trained to match the biological system. The in vitro study on osteosarcoma (MG-63) cells was used to compare with the results from the computer simulation. MG-63 cells were grown in culture and exposed to TGF-β1 to identify differences in expression of a target-gene, TGF-β -Induced 68kDa protein (TGFBI), at serial time intervals. Real-time PCR was used to measure TGFBI mRNA levels and the temporal profile was identical with that predicted by the in silico model. A sensitivities test was performed through the in silico model and a candidate target for gene-knock-down in the TGF-β signaling pathway, Smad3, was identified. An 80% reduction of this reactant in the model attenuated TGFBI expression by 64%, an effect that matched such knockdown of Smad3, in vitro, for other target genes reported in the literature. The assumption that the transcriptome drives the reactome is validated and substantiates a novel method for deriving parameters for kinetic deterministic models of biological systems.

Keywords

kinetic model gene expression profile parameter estimation sensitivities analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Valdez, C.M., Phelix, C.F., Smith, M.A., Perry, G., Santamaria, F.: Modeling cholesterol metabolism by gene expression profiling in the hippocampus. Molecular BioSystems 7, 1891–1901 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zi, Z., Klipp, E.: Constraint-based modeling and kinetic analysis of the Smad dependent TGF- signaling pathway. PLoS One 2(9), e936 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clarke, D.C., Liu, X.: Decoding the quantitative nature of TGF-β/Smad signaling. Trends Cell Biol. 18(9), 430–442 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melke, P., Jonsson, H., Pardali, E., ten Dijke, P., Peterson, C.: A rate equation approach to elucidate the kinetics and robustness of the TGF-beta pathway. Biophysical Journal 91(12), 4368–4380 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chung, S.W., Miles, F.L., Sikes, R.A., Cooper, C.R., Farach-Carson, M.C., Oqunnaike, B.: Quantitative modeling and analysis of the transforming growth factor beta signaling pathway. Biophysical Journal 95(5), 1733–1750 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zamilpa, R., Rupaimoole, R., Phelix, C.F., Somaraki-Cormier, M., Haskins, W., Asmis, R., LeBaron, R.G.: C-terminal fragment of transforming growth factor beta-induced protein (TGFBIp) is required for apoptosis in human osteosarcoma cells. Matrix Bio. 28(6), 347–353 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yuan, C., Yang, M.-C., Zins, E.J., Boehlke, C.S., Huang, A.: Identification of the promoter region of the human IGH3 gene. Molecular Vision 10, 351–360 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kobayashi, T., Liu, X., Wen, F.Q., et al.: Smad3 mediates TGF-beta1 induction of VEGF production in lung fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 327(2), 393–398 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kobayashi, T., Liu, X., Wen, F.Q., et al.: Smad3 mediates TGF-beta1-induced collagen gel contraction in human lung fibroblasts. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 339(1), 290–295 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadikovic, B., Yoshimoto, M., Al-Romaih, K., Maire, G., Zielenska, M., Squire, J.A.: In vitro analysis of integrated global high-resolution DNA methylation profiling with genomic imbalance and gene expression in osteosarcoma. PLoS One 3(7), e2834 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Croft, D., et al.: Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D691–D697 (2011) (accessed April 15, 2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoops, S., et al.: COPASIa COmplex PAthway SImulator. Bioinformatics 22(24), 3067–3074 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Barrett, T., et al.: NCBI GEO: archive for high-throughput functional genomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D885–D890 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fundel, K., Kuffner, R., Aigner, T., Zimmer, R.: Normalization and gene p-value estimation:issues in microarray data processing. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2, 291–305 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Riel, N.A.W.: Dynamic modeling analysis of biochemical networks: mechanismbased models and model-based experiments. Briefings in Bioinformatics 7(4), 364–374 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gomes, G.: Practical applications of systems biology in the pharmaceutical industry. Int. Drug. Disc 5(2), 54–57 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clyde F. Phelix
    • 1
  • Bethaney Watson
    • 1
  • Richard G. LeBaron
    • 1
  • Greg Villareal
    • 2
  • Dawnlee Roberson
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.CFPAL Biomedical ConsultantsSan AntonioUSA
  3. 3.AL Phahelix Biometrics IncSan AntonioUSA

Personalised recommendations