Neuro-aided H2 Controller Design for Aircraft under Actuator Failure

  • Zhifeng Wang
  • Guangcai Xiong
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 145)


To advocate the development of new robust and reliable controllers, it has been defined a benchmark problem, where robust controllers are required for controlling a 6-Degree of Freedom (6-DOF) nonlinear F16 aircraft in auto-landing phase undergoing actuator failures. This paper attempt to provide a solution by developing a robust Neural Network (Neuro) aided H2 controller. Simulation results show that the fault tolerant performance of the proposed Neuro-aided H2 controller is better than H2 controller under actuator failure condition, both the number of hidden neurons and the time of on-line learning are small enough to be used in engineer problems.


Radial Basis Function Radial Basis Function Neural Network Neural Controller Flight Control System Actuator Failure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Pallett, E.H.J., Coyle, S.: Automatic Flight Control. Blackwell Scientific (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Donald, M.: Automatic Flight Control Systems. Prentice-Hall (1990)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bole, M., Svoboda, J.: Design of a Reconfigurable Automated Landing System for VTOL Unmanned Air Vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2000 National Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 2000, pp. 801–806 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jorgensen, C.C., Scheley, C.: Neural Network Baseline Problem for Control of Aircraft Flare and Touchdown. In: Neural Networks for Control, pp. 402–425. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Calise, A.J.: Neural Networks in Non-Linear Aircraft Flight Control. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 5–19 (July 1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Steinberg, M., Di Giralamo, R.: Applying Neural Network Technology to Future Generation Military Flight Control Systems. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Seattle, WA (1991)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Iiguni, Y., Akiyoshi, H., Adachi, N.: An Intelligent Landing System Based On a Human Skill Model. IEEE Trans. on Aerospace and Electronic System 34(3), 877–882 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Napolitano, M.R., Kincheloe, M.: On-Line Learning Neural-Network Controllers for Autopilot Systems. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 33(6), 1008–1015 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lu, Y., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P.: Performance Evolution of a Sequential Minimal Radial Basis function(RBF) Neural Network Learning Algorithm. IEEE Tran. on Neural Network 9(2), 308–318 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao, Y.Y., Lin, Z.L., Ward, D.G.: Hinf Antiwindup Design for Linear Systems Subject to Input Saturation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 25(3), 455–463 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naidu, D.S., Banda, S.S., Buffington, J.L.: Unified Approach To H2 and Hinf Optimal Control of a Hypersonic Vehicle. In: Proc. of the American Control Conference, pp. 2737–2741, San Diego, California (June 1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hyde, R.A., Glover, K.: The Application of Scheduled Hinf Controllers to a VSTOL Aircraft. IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control 38(7), 402–425 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nguyen, L.T., Marilyn, E.O., William, P.G., Kemper, S.K., Philip, W.B., Deal, P.L.: Simulator study of stall/post stall characteristics of a fighter airplane with relaxed longitudinal static stability. NASA Technical Paper 1538, USA (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, Y., Wang, Z.F., Sundararajan, N.: Robust Neural Controller Design for Aircraft Auto Landing Under Failures., DSOCL01144, Final Report (December 2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Che, J., Chen, D.G.: Automatic Landing Control using Hinf Control and Stable Inversion. In: Orlando, F.U. (ed.) Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (December 2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shue, S., Agarwal, R.K.: Design of Automatic Landing Systems using Mixed H2/Hinf Control. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 22(1), 103–114 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, Y., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P., Wang, Z.F.: Robust Neuro-Hinf Controller Design for Aircraft Auto-Landing. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 40(1), 167–168 (2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li, Y., Wang, Z.F., Sundararajan, N., Saratchandran, P.: Robust and Adaptive Neuro-Controller for Aircraft Undergoing Microburst. In: Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Denver, Colorado (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gomi, H., Kawato, M.: Neural network control for a closed-loop system using feedback-error-learning. Neural Networks 6(7), 933–946 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of AutomationNorthwestern Polytechnical UniversityXianChina

Personalised recommendations