Advertisement

Nature-Inspired Porous Airfoils for Sound Reduction

  • Thomas Geyer
  • Ennes Sarradj
  • Christoph Fritzsche
Part of the Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design book series (NNFM, volume 119)

Abstract

Inspired by the results from acoustic measurements on flying owls and prepared owl wings that support the thesis of the silent flight of owls, measurements were conducted on technical airfoils made from open-porous, flow-permeable materials, characterized by their air flow resistivity, in an aeroacoustic wind tunnel. One major objective of these experiments is the identification of porous materials that enable a reduction of aeroacoustic noise. Both the generation of trailing edge noise and the generation of leading edge noise were investigated using microphone array technology and three-dimensional deconvolution beamforming algorithms. The highest trailing edge noise reduction per unit lift force can be achieved by using airfoils with medium to high air flow resistivities, while the highest leading edge noise reduction was measured for airfoils with low air flow resistivities.

Keywords

Turbulent Boundary Layer Noise Source Lift Force Strouhal Number Aerodynamic Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amiet, R.K.: Acoustic radiation from an airfoil in a turbulent stream. J. Sound Vib. 41, 407–420 (1975)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blake, W.K.: Mechanics of Flow-Induced Sound and Vibration, Volume II: Complex Flow-Structure Interactions. In: Frenkiel, F.N., Temple, G. (eds.) Applied Mathematics and Mechanics. Academic Press, Inc., Orlando (1986)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brooks, T.F., Humphreys, W.M.: A deconvolution approach for the mapping of acoustic sources (DAMAS) determined from phased microphone arrays. J. Sound Vib. 294, 856–879 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ffowcs Williams, J.E., Hall, L.H.: Aerodynamic sound generation by turbulent flow in the vicinity of a scattering halfplane. J. Fluid Mech. 40, 657–670 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C.: Silent owl flight: experiments in the aeroacoustic wind tunnel. In: Fortschritte der Akustik - NAG/DAGA, Conference Proceedings, pp. 734–736 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C.: Measurement of the noise generation at the trailing edge of porous airfoils. Exp. Fluids 48, 291–308 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C.: Porous airfoils: noise reduction and boundary layer effects. Int. J. Aeroacoust. 9(6), 787–820 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., Giesler, J., Hobracht, M.: Experimental assessment of the noise generated at the leading edge of porous airfoils using microphone array techniques. In: 17th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-paper 2011-2713 (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geyer, T.: Trailing edge noise generation of porous airfoils. PhD thesis, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Geyer, T., Sarradj, E., Giesler, J.: Application of a beamforming technique to the measurement of airfoil leading edge noise. Adv. Acoust. Vib. (2011) (article in press)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Graham, R.R.: The silent flight of owls. J. R Aeronaut. Soc. 286, 837–843 (1934)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 9053: 1991: Acoustics – Materials for acoustical applications – Determination of airflow resistance. International Organization for Standardization (1991)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lilley, G.M.: A study of the silent flight of the owl. In: 4th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-paper 98-2340 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Oerlemans, S., Migliore, P.: Aeroacoustic wind tunnel tests of wind turbine airfoils. National Aerospace Laboratory Techreport NLR-TP-2004-319, The Netherlands (also Presented at the 10th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference as AIAA-paper 2004-3042) (2004)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C., Geyer, T., Giesler, J.: Acoustic and aerodynamic design and characterization of a small-scale aeroacoustic wind tunnel. Appl. Acoust. 70, 1073–1080 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sarradj, E.: A fast signal subspace approach for the determination of absolute levels from phased microphone array measurements. J. Sound Vib. 329, 1553–1569 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sarradj, E., Fritzsche, C., Geyer, T.: Silent owl flight: bird flyover noise measurements. AIAA J. 49(4), 769–779 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sijtsma, P.: CLEAN based on spatial source coherence. In: 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA-paper 2007-3436 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Geyer
    • 1
  • Ennes Sarradj
    • 1
  • Christoph Fritzsche
    • 1
  1. 1.Aeroacoustics GroupBrandenburg University of TechnologyCottbusGermany

Personalised recommendations