Design, Implementation and Operation of Human Ecosystem: Concepts and Methods

  • Gunther Geller
  • Detlef Glücklich


For designing, constructing and operating human ecosystems practical approaches and tools are required. The general requirement is that they must be based on a holistic ecosystem approach, which encompasses all the ecosystem elements: the place, the fluxes and the inhabitants. And because it is a human ecosystem, it must include the technical-cultural parts of the system in particular (Fig. 3.1).


Green Space Master Plan Landscape Context Urban Green Space Vegetation Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baldwin, Chr. 1998. Calling the Circle. The First and Future Culture. Bantam Books, New York: 245.Google Scholar
  2. Bianchi, F. J. J. A. Booij, C. J. H., Tscharntke, T. 2006. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences: 273, (1595): 1715–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gaffron, P., Huismans, G., Skala, F. 2008. Ecocity Book II. How to make it Happen. Facultas Verlags- und Buchhandels AG, Vienna: 84.Google Scholar
  4. Gagel, D. 1995. Action Research and Small Enterprise Promotion. Methods of participatory project planning and implementation in development cooperation. GTZ, Eschborn: 237.Google Scholar
  5. Grebe (Hrsg.) 1977. Vorentwurf zum Landschaftsplan Köln als Beitrag zum Flächennutzungsplan. Planungsbüro Grebe, Nürnberg: 142.Google Scholar
  6. IAIA. 2005. Biodiversity in Impact Assessment. IAIA Special Publications Series 3. – IAIA: 1–4.
  7. IAIA, B. S. 2010. Biodiversity - Key Citations Series. - International Association of Impact Assessment.
  8. Longman, KA. 2003. Tropical trees: propagation and planting manuals. Volume 2: Raising seedlings of tropical trees. Commonwealth Science Council, London, UK.
  9. Ludema, J., Whitney, D., Mohr, B., Griffin, Th. 2003. The Appreciative Inquiry Summit. A Practioner´s Guide for Leading Large Group Change. Berret-Koehler, San Francisco: 310.Google Scholar
  10. Lyle, J. 1999. Design for Human Ecosystems: Landscape, Land Use, and Natural Resources. Island Press: 288.Google Scholar
  11. Macy, J. 1991. Mutual Causality in Buddhism and General Systems Theory. The Dharma of Natural Systems. State University of New York Press, New York: 236.Google Scholar
  12. Palutec, 2008. Ökologische Kreislaufwirtschaft an der Valley View University Accra (Ghana) – Teilprojekt 4 – Abschlussbericht der Palutec GmbH (BMBF Verbundvorhaben, Förderkennzeichen 02WD0475)Google Scholar
  13. Roseland, M. 2006. Towards Sustainable Communities. Resources for citizens and their governments. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island BC, Canada and Stony Creek CT, USA:Google Scholar
  14. Werner C.; Otterpohl R.; Jönsson H. 2004. 10 Recommendations for action from the Lübeck symposium on ecological sanitation, “Ecosan—closing the loop”—Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on ecological sanitation, 07–11 April 2003, Lübeck, Germany.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gunther Geller
    • 1
  • Detlef Glücklich
    • 2
  1. 1.Ingenieurökologische Vereinigung IÖVAugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Bureau for Sustainable DesignBuchholz Holm-SeppensenGermany

Personalised recommendations