Cardiovascular Monitoring

  • Karen-Lise Welling


Most patients with severe TBI are young with no pre-existing cardiac problems. Other TBI patients may suffer from associated multiple trauma or pre-existing cardiac disease. The intensivist is challenged by the overall goal of obtaining cardiovascular stability in order to prevent development of cerebral ischaemia and secondary injury. The aim of haemodynamic monitoring is to alert the team to crisis before it occurs and to diagnose, treat and monitor response of the cardiovascular system to treatment.


Fluid Responsiveness Pulse Pressure Variation Stroke Volume Variation Pulse Contour Analysis Haemodynamic Monitoring 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Benjelid K, Romand JA (2003) Fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 29:352–360Google Scholar
  2. Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M et al (2001) Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg 92:984–989PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boldt J (2009) Hemodynamic monitoring. Uni-Med verlag AG, BremenGoogle Scholar
  4. Button D, Weibel L, Reuthebuch O et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Vigileo system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 99:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chestnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR et al (1993) The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe brain injury. J Trauma 34:216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clayton TJ, Nelson RJ, Manara AR (2004) Reduction in mortality from severe head injury following introduction of a protocol for intensive care management. Br J Anaesth 93:761–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P (2008) Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth 100:245–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elf K, Nilsson P, Enblad P (2002) Outcome after traumatic brain injury improved by an organized secondary insult program and standardized neurointensive care. Crit Care Med 30:2129–2134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grände PE (2006) The “Lund concept” for the treatment of severe head trauma – physiological principles and clinical application. Intensive Care Med 32:1475–1484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA et al (2010) Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters. Crit Care 14:R212PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofer CK, Furrer I, Matter-Ensner S et al (2005) Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth 94:650–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E et al (2004) Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 32:691–699PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B (2008) Does central venous pressure predict fluid resposiveness? A systematic review of the leterature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 134:172–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T et al (2009) Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 37(9):2642–2647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. A critical analysis of evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nordström CJ (2007) The “Lund concept”: what it is and what it isn’t. Intensive Care Med 33:558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P et al (2007) Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 35:4–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pinsky MR, Payen D (2005) Functional hemodynamic monitoring. Crit Care 9:566–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Powner DJ, Miller ER, Levine RL (2005) CVP and PaoP measurements are discordant during fluid therapy after traumatic brain injury. J Intensive Care Med 20:28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reinhart K, Kuhn HJ, Hartog C et al (2004) Continuous central venous and pulmonary artery oxygen saturation monitoring in the critically ill. Intensive Care Med 30:152–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Brand P et al (2007) Global end-diastolic volume as a variable of fluid responsiveness during acute changing loading conditions. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 21:650–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C et al (2002) Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 28:392–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rex S, Brose MS et al (2004) Prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients during cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 93:782–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schober P, Loer SA, Schwarte LA (2009) Perioperative hemodynamic monitoring with transesophageal Doppler technology. Anesth Analg 109:340–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Srinivasa S, Taylor MHG, Sammour T et al (2011) Oesophageal doppler-guided fluid administration in colorectal surgery: critical appraisal of published clinical trials. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:4–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Neurointensive CareCopenhagen University Hospital (Rigshospitalet)CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations