Advertisement

A Neurological Wake-Up Test in the Neurointensive Care Unit: Pros and Cons

  • Niklas Marklund
Chapter

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) induces a marked systemic biochemical stress response with the release of several stress-related hormones including cortisol and the catecholamines. A major aim of using continuous sedation in the neurointensive care unit (NIC) unit is to attenuate the TBI-induced stress response via reduction of the cerebral energy metabolic demands. In the era of modern multimodality monitoring and neuroimaging for patients with severe TBI, what is the role for neurological evaluation, a neurological wake-up test (NWT), of patients on continuous sedation and mechanical ventilation? In particular, does the information obtained by the NWT outweigh the risk of inducing a substantial stress response? The additional use of NWTs in NIC is controversial and is not mentioned in any recent TBI guidelines. Although daily interruption of continuous sedation is suggested for patients in general intensive care, reasons for not using the NWT in NIC may be a fear of an NWT-induced stress response and uncertainty to the additional value of NWTs in patients monitored with multimodality monitoring and frequent neuroradiological examinations. A recent survey showed that use of NWT varies markedly in Scandinavians’ NIC units where half of the evaluated centres never use the NWT, whereas others use the NWT up to six times daily. In a series of studies characterising the NWT-induced stress response, the NWT was found to induce a significant increase in ICP and CPP in severe TBI patients on controlled ventilation. Additionally, the NWT caused an increase in adrenocorticotrophic (ACTH) hormone, catecholamine and cortisol levels. In the absolute majority of patients, the ICP and CPP changes were modest and transient and the absolute increases in stress hormone levels were small. However, the stress response was marked in a small subset of patients. These studies suggest that the NWT is safe in the majority of patients but that the test should be individualised and avoided in patients reacting with markedly increased ICP and/or decreased CPP. Although important clinical information may be obtained from the NWT, future studies need to evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the NWT in TBI management.

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Traumatic Brain Injury Patient Continuous Sedation Daily Interruption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anifantaki S, Prinianakis G, Vitsaksaki E et al (2009) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in an adult medical-surgical intensive care unit: randomized controlled trial. J Adv Nurs 65:1054–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bondanelli M, Ambrosio MR, Zatelli MC et al (2005) Hypopituitarism after traumatic brain injury. Eur J Endocrinol 152:679–691PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clifton GL, Ziegler MG, Grossman RG (1981) Circulating catecholamines and sympathetic activity after head injury. Neurosurgery 8:10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimopoulou I, Tsagarakis S (2005) Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction in critically ill patients with ­traumatic and nontraumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med 31:1020–1028PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Girard TD, Kress JP, Fuchs BD et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of a paired sedation and ventilator weaning protocol for mechanically ventilated patients in intensive care (Awakening and Breathing Controlled trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 371:126–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Helbok R, Badjatia N (2009) Is daily awakening always safe in severely brain injured patients? Neurocrit Care 11:133–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jackson DL, Proudfoot CW, Cann KF, Walsh T (2010) A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety. Crit Care 14:R59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kollef MH, Levy NT, Ahrens TS et al (1998) The use of continuous i.v. sedation is associated with prolongation of mechanical ventilation. Chest 114:541–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kress JP, Pohlman AS, O’Connor MF, Hall JB (2000) Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation. N Engl J Med 342:1471–1477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Maas AI, Stocchetti N, Bullock R (2008) Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Lancet Neurol 7:728–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mautes AE, Muller M, Cortbus F et al (2001) Alterations of norepinephrine levels in plasma and CSF of patients after traumatic brain injury in relation to disruption of the blood–brain barrier. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 143:51–57; discussion 57–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ostermann ME, Keenan SP, Seiferling RA, Sibbald WJ (2000) Sedation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. JAMA 283:1451–1459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rhoney DH, Parker D Jr (2001) Use of sedative and analgesic agents in neurotrauma patients: effects on cerebral physiology. Neurol Res 23:237–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schweickert WD, Gehlbach BK, Pohlman AS et al (2004) Daily interruption of sedative infusions and complications of critical illness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care Med 32:1272–1276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Skoglund K, Enblad P, Marklund N (2009) Effects of the neurological wake-up test on intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure in brain-injured patients. Neurocrit Care 11:135–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Skoglund K, Enblad P, Marklund N (2011) Monitoring and sedation differences in the management of severe head injury and subarachnoid hemorrhage in Scandinavian neurocritical care centers 1999–2009. EANN meeting, Blankenberge, 4–7 May 2011Google Scholar
  17. Skoglund K, Enblad P, Marklund N (2012) Interruption of continuous sedation increases cortisol and ACTH levels in patients with severe TBI. Crit Care Med 40(1):216–222Google Scholar
  18. Strömgren K, Marklund N (2003) The use of neurological examination in severely brain-injured patients – its use in Scandinavian Neurointensive Care Units and the influence on ICP and CPP. European Association of Neuroscience Nursing Congress (EANN), Copenhagen, 19–21 May 2003Google Scholar
  19. Teasdale G, Jennett B (1974) Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 2:81–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tisdall MM, Smith M (2007) Multimodal monitoring in traumatic brain injury: current status and future directions. Br J Anaesth 99:61–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wittbrodt ET (2005) Daily interruption of continuous sedation. Pharmacotherapy 25:3S–7SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryUppsala University HospitalUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations