Advertisement

Harmonization of Business Process Models

  • Heidi Romero
  • Remco Dijkman
  • Paul Grefen
  • Arjan van Weele
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 99)

Abstract

When multiple similar business processes must be designed, a trade-off is necessary between designing a single, standardized, process or designing multiple, specific, processes. Standardization, on the one hand, helps to benefit from re-use of resources and to reduce redundancy. Specificity, on the other hand, helps to tailor the processes to specific needs. The activity of deciding on this trade-off is called harmonization. This paper operationalizes the notion of process harmonization, identifies aspects that determine harmonization and defines metrics to determine the level of harmonization. Furthermore, it presents the factors that influence the level of harmonization that can be achieved in a company. The harmonization aspects and factors are extracted from case studies in practice. Together the metrics, aspects and factors can be used to determine the current and optimal level of harmonization for a company.

Keywords

Business Process Process Variant Distinct Element Legal Requirement Procurement Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Muenstermann, B., Eckhardt, A., Weitzel, T.: The performance impact of business process standardization. Business Process Management Journal 6, 29–56 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davenport, T.: The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review 83, 100–108 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wöllenweber, K., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., König, W.: The impact of process standardization on business process outsourcing success. Information Systems Frontiers 10, 221–224 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vuller, M., La Rosa, M.: Configurable Process Models: Experiences from a Municipality Case Study. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 486–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Richen, A., Steinhorst, A.: Standardization or harmonization? you need both. In: European Health Informatics (November 2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tay, J., Parker, R.: Measuring international harmonization and standardization. Abacus 28, 217–220 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Welch, J., Kordysh, D.: Seven keys to erp success. Strategic Finance 89, 40–47 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darshana, S., Dey, S.: Everyone is different! exploring the issues and problems with ERP enabled shared service initiatives. In: Proc. of ACIS 2007, pp. 93–98 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norta, A., Eshuis, R.: Specification and verification of harmonized business process collaborations. Information Systems Frontiers 12, 457–479 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W., Jansen-Vuller, M., La Rosa, M.: Configurable workflow models. IJCIS 17, 177–221 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gulla, J., Mollan, R.: Implementing SAP R/3 in a multi-cultural organization. In: Proc. of EMRPS 1999, pp. 127–134 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tumay, K.: Business process simulation. In: Proc. of Conf. on Winter Simulation, pp. 93–98. IEEE Computer Society (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schafermeyer, M., Grgecic, D., Rosenkranz, C.: Factor influencing business process standardization. In: Proc. of HICSS 2010, pp. 3–10. IEEE Computer Society (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dijkman, R.: Diagnosing Differences Between Business Process Models. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heidi Romero
    • 1
  • Remco Dijkman
    • 1
  • Paul Grefen
    • 1
  • Arjan van Weele
    • 1
  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations