Advertisement

Fundamentals of Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage

  • Mingquan Zhou
  • Guohua Geng
  • Zhongke Wu

Abstract

Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage is a new technology to preserve cultural artifacts and relics effectively through modern information technology. This is related to the variants of information technology including computer graphics, image processing, and other related subfields. Digital Preservation mainly includes the following four areas: modeling of cultural relics and ancient ruins, rendering techniques, simulation techniques, and retrieval techniques.

Keywords

Point Cloud Cultural Heritage Implicit Surface Triangle Mesh Scene Graph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Reeves WT (1983) Particle Systems: a Technique for Modeling a Class of Fuzzy Objects. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 2(2): 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Barr A (1984) Global and Deformations of Solid Primitives. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, July 1984, 18(3):21–30, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Sederberg TW, Parry SR. (1986) Free-form Deformation of Solid Geometric Models. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics, 20(4): 151–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Loop CT (1987) Smooth Subdivision Surfaces Based on Triangles. Master’ s thesis. Department of Mathematics, University of Utah, Utah, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Catmull E, Clark J (1978) Recursively Generated B-spline Surfaces on Arbitrary Topological Meshes. Computer Aided Design, 10(6): 350–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Doo D, Sabin M (1998) Behaviour of Recursive Division Surfaces Near Extraordinary Points. ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Zorin D, Schroder P (2000) Subdivision for Modeling and Animation. Course Notes for SIGGRAPH, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Hsu WM, Hughes JF, Kaufman H (1992) Direct Manipulation of Free-form Deformations. ACM Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Borrel P, Rappoport A (1994) Simple Constrained Deformations for Geometric Modeling and Interactive Design. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 13(2): 137–155zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Gu X, Yau S (2003) Global Conformal Surface Parameterization. In: Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Geometry, pp 127–137 Aire-la-Ville, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    L’evy B, Petitjeans S, Ray N, et al (2002) Least Squares Conformal Maps for Automatic Texture Atlas Generation. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 2002, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Alexa M, Behr J, Cohen-Or D, et al (2001) Point Set Surfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visualization, pp 21–28, San Diego, California, 21–26 October 2001Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Carr JC, et al (2001) Reconstruction and Representation of 3D Objects with Radial Basis Functions. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 2001, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Ohtake Y, Belyaev A, Alexa M, et al (2003) Multi-level Partition of Unity Implicits. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 2003, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kazhdan M, Bolitho M, Hoppe H (2006) Poisson Surface Reconstruction. In: Proceedings of the SGP 2006, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, pp 61–70Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Levin D (1998) The Approximation Power of Moving Least-squares. Mathematics of Computation, 67(224): 1517–1532MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Levin D (2003) Mesh-independent Surface Interpolation. Geometric Modeling for Scientific Visualization, pp 37–49, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Dey TK, Li G, Sun J (2005) Normal Estimation for Point Clouds: A Comparison Study for a Voronoi Based Method. In: Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE VGTC Symposium on Point-Based Graphics, pp 39–46Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Besl PJ, McKay HD (1992) A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 14(2): 239–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Yang C, Medioni G (1992) Object Modeling by Registration of Multiple Range Images. Image and Vision Computing, 10(3): 145–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Bergevin R, Soucy M, Gagnon H, et al (1996) Towards a General Multi-View Registration Technique. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 18(5): 540–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. (2001) Efficient Variants of the ICP Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the of the International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp 145–152Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    Park SY, Subbarao M (2003) An Accurate and Fast Point-to-plane Registration Technique. Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(16): 2967–2976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Johnson AE, Kang SB (1999) Registration and Integration of Textured 3D Data. Image and Vision Computing, 17(2): 135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Gelfand N, Ikemoto L, Rusinkiewicz S, et al (2003) Geometrically Stable Sampling for the ICP Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp 260–267Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    Moenning C, Dodgson A (2003) A New Point Cloud Simplification Algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Visualization, Imaging and Image Processing, pp 8–10Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    Pauly M, Gross M, Kobbelt LP (2002) Efficient Simplification of Point-sampled Surfaces. In: Proceedings of IEEE Visualization, pp 163–170Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    Wu J, Kobbelt L (2004) Optimized Sub-Sampling of Point Sets for Surface Splatting. Computer Graphics Forum, 23(3): 643–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Pauly M, Keiser R, Gross M (2003) Multi-scale Feature Extraction on Point-sampled Surfaces. In: Proceedings of Eurographics 2003, 22: 281–289, Black-well, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    Floater MS, Reimers M (2001) Meshless Parameterization and Surface Reconstruction. Computer Aided Geometric Design, 18(2): 77–92MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Zwicker M, Pauly M, Knoll O, et al (2002) Pointshop 3D: An Interactive System for Point-based Surface Editing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(3): 322–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Hoppe H, Derose T, Duchamp T (1992). Surface Reconstruction from Unorganized Points. Computer Graphics 26(2): 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Amenta N, Bern M, Kamvysselis M (2002) A New Voronoi-based Surface Reconstruction Algorithm. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(3): 322–329Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Zaroubi S, Goelman G (2002) Complex Denoising of MR Data via Wavelet Analysis: Application for Functional MRI. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 18(1): 59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Bao P, Zhang L (2003) Noise Reduction for Magnetic Resonance Images via Adaptive Multiscale Products Thresholding. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 22(9): 1089–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Buades A, Coll B, Morel JM (2005) A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One. Simul, 4: 490–530MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Coupe P, Yger P, Barillot C (2006) Fast Nonlocal Means Denoising for 3D MR Images. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on MICCAI, pp 33–40, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1–6 October 2006Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Manjon, NA, Manjon JV, Bromiley PA (2010) A Statistical Interpretation of Non-Local Means, 4(3), 162–172MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Newman T, Yi H (2006) A Survey of the Marching Cubes Algorithm. Computers & Graphics, 30(5): 854–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Levoy M (1988) Display of Surfaces from Volume Data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 8(3): 29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Wilhelms J, Gelder AV (1991) A Coherent Projection Approach for Direct Volume Rendering. Computer Graphics, 25(4): 275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Schroeder WJ, Zarge JA, Lorensen WE (1992) Decimation of Triangle Meshes. Computer Graphics, 26(2): 65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Algorri ME, Schmitt F (1996) Mesh Simplification. Computer Graphics Forum, 15(3): 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Garland M, Heckbert PS (1997) Surface Simplification Using Quadric Error Metrics. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp 209–216Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Low K, Tan T (1997) Model Simplification Using Vertex-clustering. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, pp 75–82Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    Cignoni P, Montani C, Scopigno R (1998) A Comparison of Mesh Simplification Algorithms. Computers & Graphics, 22(1): 37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    Gumbau J, Ripolles O, Chover M (2007) LOD Manager: A Framework for Rendering Multi-resolution Models in Real-time Applications. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conferences in Central Europe on Computer Graphics, Visualization and Computer Vision, 29 January–1 February 2007, Plzen, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    Ripolles O, Chover M, Gumbau J, et al (2009) Rendering Continuous Level-of-detail Meshes by Masking Strips. Graphical Models, 71(5): 184–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Slater M, Chrysanthou Y (1997) View Volume Culling Using a Probabilistic Caching Scheme. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Greene N, Kass M, Miller G (1993) Hierarchical Z-buffer Visibility. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 1993, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Zhang H, Manocha D, Hudson D, et al (1997) Visibility Culling Using Hierarchical Occlusion Maps. Computer Graphics, 31: 77–88Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Airey JM, Rohlf JH, Brooks Jr FP (1990) Towards Image Realism with Interactive Update Rates in Complex Virtual Building Environments. Computer Graphics, 24(2): 41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Cohen-or D, Chrysanthou YL, Silva C, et al (2003) A Survey of Visibility for Walkthrough Applications. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 9(3): 412–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Weil J (1986) The Synthesis of Cloth Objects. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 1986, 20(4): 49–54, ACM Press, New York.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    Miller GSP (1988) The Motion Dynamics of Snakes and Worms. Computer Graphics, 22(4): 169–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    Tu X, Terzopoulos D (1994) Artificial Fishes: Physics, Locomotion, Perception, Behavior. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp 43–50Google Scholar
  57. [57]
    Terzopoulos D, Platt J, Barr A, et al (1987) Elastically Deformable Models. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH 1987, Computer Graphics, 21(4): 205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Platt JC, Barr AH (1988) Constraints Methods for Flexible Models. Computer Graphics, 22(4): 279–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    Shinya M, Fournier A (1992) Stochastic Motion-Motion Under the Influence of Wind. Computer Graphics Forum, 11(3): 119–128zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Norton A, Turk G, Bacon B, et al (1991) Animation of Fracture by Physical Modeling. Visual Computer, 7(4): 210–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    Kass M, Miller G (1990) Rapid, Stable Fluid Dynamics for Computer Graphics. Computer Graphics, 24(4): 49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    Sera H, Morishima S, Terzopoulos D (1996) Physics-based Muscle Model for Mouth Shape Control. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, pp 207–212, Tsukuba, Japan, 11–14 November 1996Google Scholar
  63. [63]
    Albrecht I, Haber J, Seidel H (2002) Speech Synchronization for Physics-based Facial Animation. In: Proceedings of the WSCG 2002, pp 9–16Google Scholar
  64. [64]
    Nadia BL, Thalmann NM, Thalmann D (1991) Cloth Animation with Self-collision Detection. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Modeling in Computer Graphics, pp 179–187, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Bridson R, Fedkiw R, Anderson J (2002) Robust Treatment of Collisions, Contact and Friction for Cloth Animation. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21: 594–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Boulic R, Ulicny B, Thalmann D (2004) Versatile Walk Engine. Journal of Game Development, 1(1): 29–52Google Scholar
  67. [67]
    Reynolds CW (1987) Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. Computer Graphics, 21(4): 25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    Bouvier E, Cohen E, Najman LC (1997) From Crowd Simulations to Airbag Deployment: Particle System, a New Paradigm of Simulation. Journal of eletronic Imaging, 6(1): 94–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Helbing D, Farkas I, Vicsek T (2000) Simulating Dynamical Features of Escape Panic. Nature, 407(6803): 487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    Musse SR, Thalmann D (1997) A Model of Human Crowd Behavior: Group Inter-relationship and Collision Detection Analysis. In: Proceedings of the Workshop of Computer Animation and Simulation of Eurographics, pp 39–51Google Scholar
  71. [71]
    Lee J, Funkhouser TA (2008) Sketch-Based Search and Composition of 3D Models. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-based Interfaces and Modeling, Annecy, France, 11–13 June 2008Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Shen Y, Chen D, Tian X, et al (2003) 3D Model Search Engine Based on Lightfield Descriptors. EUROGRAPHICS Interactive Demos, Granada, Spain, 1–6 September 2003Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Suzuki M (2001) A Web Based Retireval System for 3D Polygonal Models. In: Proceedings of the 20th NAFIPS International Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 25–28 July 2001Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Vranic DV (2005) DESIRE: A Composite 3D-shape Descriptor. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Exp, pp 962–965, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 6–8 July 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
  76. [76]
    Paquet E, Murching A, Naveen T, et al (2000) Description of Shape Information for 2D and 3D Objects. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 16(1): 103–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    http://3d-search.iti.gr/3DSearch. Accessed 20 May 2011Google Scholar
  78. [78]
    Paquet E, Rioux M (1998) A Content-based Search Engine for VRML Databases. In: Proceedings of 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE Computer Society, pp 541–546, Santa Barbara, USA, 23–25 June 1998Google Scholar
  79. [79]
    Osada R, Funkhouser T, Chazelle B, et al (2002) Shape Distributions. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 21(4): 807–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    Zhang C, Chen T (2001) Efficient Feature Extraction For 2D/3D Objects in Mesh Representation. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International Conference on Image Processing, pp 935–938, Thessaloniki, Greece, 7–10 October 2001Google Scholar
  81. [81]
    Zaharia T, Preteux F (2001) 3D Shape-based Retrieval within the MPEG-7 Framework. In: Proceedings of SPIE Conference on Nonlinear Image Processing and Pattern Analysis XII, 4304: 133–145, San Jose, USA, January 2001Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    Ankerst M, Kastenmller G, Kriegel HP, et al (1999) 3D Shape Histograms for Similarity Search and Classification in Spatial Databases. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Advances in Spatial Databases, pp 207–226, Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    Reeb GC (1960) Sur les Points Singuliers d’une Forme de Pfaff compl Tement int Grable ou d’une fonction Numrique. Comptes Rendus Acad Sciences, 222: 847–849MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    Biasotti S, Giorgi D, Spagnuolo M, Falcidieno B (2008) Reeb Graphs for Shape Analysis and Applications. Theoretical Computer Science, 392(1–3): 5–22MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Biasotti S, Marini S, Mortara M, et al (2003) An Overview on Properties and Efficacy of Topological Skeletons in Shape Modelling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Modeling International, pp 245–254, IEEE Computer Society, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    Biasotti S, Marini S, Mortara M, et al (2003) 3D Shape Matching through Topological Structures. Discrete Geometry for Computer Imagery, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2886: 194–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    Sundar H, Silver D, Gagvani N, et al (2003) Skeleton Based Shape Matching and Retrieval. Proceedings of the Shape Modeling International. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Modeling and Applications, IEEE Computer Society, pp 130–290, Seoul, Korea,12–16 May 2003Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Iyer N, Janyanti S, Lou K, et al (2004) A Multi-Scale Hierarchical 3D Shape Representation for Similar Shape Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the TMCE 2004, pp1–10, Lausanne, Switzerland, 12–16 April 2004Google Scholar
  89. [89]
    Iyer N, Jayanti S, Lou K, et al (2005) Three-dimensional Shape Searching: State-of-the-art Review and Future Trends. Computer Aided Design, 37(5): 509–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    EI-Mehalawi M, Miller RA (2003) A Database System of Mechanical Components Based on Geometric and Topological Similarity. Part I: representation. Computer Aided Design, 35(1): 83–94Google Scholar
  91. [91]
    Cicirello V, Regli WC (2001) Machining Feature-Based Comparisons of Mechanical Parts. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Modelling and Applications, IEEE Computer Society, pp 176–185, Genoa Italy, 7–11 May 2001Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    Zarpalas D, Daras P, Axenopoulos A, et al (2007) 3D Model Search and Retrieval Using the Spherical Trace Transform. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, pp 207–207Google Scholar
  93. [93]
    Loffler J (2000) Content-based Retrieval of 3D Models in Distributed Web Databases by Visual Shape Information. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, IEEE Computer Society, pp 82–87, London, UK, 19–21 July 2002Google Scholar
  94. [94]
    Kanai S (2008) Content-based 3D Mesh Model Retrieval From Hand-written Sketch. International Journal of Interact Design Manufacture, 2(2): 87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. [95]
    Wang Y, Liu R, Baba T, et al (2008) An Images-based 3D Model Retrieval Approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp 90–100, Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    Funkhouser T, Min P, Kazhdan M (2003) A Search Engine for 3D Models. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 22(1): 83–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    Vranic DV, Saupe D, Richter J (2001) Tools for 3D-object Retrieval: Karhunen-Loeve Transform and Spherical Harmonics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Workshop Multimedia Signal Processing, pp 293–298, Cannes, France, 3–5 October 2001Google Scholar
  98. [98]
    Ohbuchi R, Nakazawa M, Takei T (2003) Retrieving 3D Shapes Based on their Appearance. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGMM International Workshop on Multimedia Information Retrieval, pp 39–45, ACM Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    Chen D, Tian XP, Shen YT (2003) On Visual Similarity Based 3D Model Retrieval. Computer Graphics Forum, 22(3): 223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    Vranic DV (2001) 3D Model Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the Spring Conference on Computer Graphics and its Applications, pp 89–93, Budmerice, Slovakia, 3–6 May 2000Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    Yu M, Atmosukarto I, Leow WK, et al (2003) 3D Model Retrieval with Morphing-based Geometric and Topological Feature Maps. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp 656–661Google Scholar
  102. [102]
    Kazhdan M, Funkhouser T, Rusinkiewicz S (2003) Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D shape Descriptors. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Geometry Processing, pp 156–164, Aire-la-Ville, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    Novotni M, Klein R (2003) 3D Zernike Descriptors for Content Based Shape Retrieval. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Symposium on Solid Modeling and Applications, pp 216–225, ACM Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. [104]
    Ricard J, Coeurjolly D, Baskurt A (2005) Generalizations of Angular Radial Trans form for 2D and 3D Shape Retrieval. Pattern Recognition Letters, 26(14): 2174–2186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. [105]
    Mitra NJ, Guibas LJ, Pauly M (2006) Partial and Approximate Symmetry Detection for 3D Geometry. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 25(3): 560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    Li M, Langbein FC, Martin RR (2008) Detecting Approximate Symmetries of Discrete Point Subsets. Computer Aided Design, 2008, 40(1): 76–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. [107]
    Kazhdan M, Chazelle B, Dobkin D, et al (2004) A Reflective Symmetry Descriptor for 3D Models. Algorithmica, 38(1): 201–225MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Higher Education Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mingquan Zhou
    • 1
  • Guohua Geng
    • 2
  • Zhongke Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information Science and TechnologyBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingP.R. China
  2. 2.College of Information Science and TechnologyNorthwest UniversityXi’anP.R. China

Personalised recommendations