Postoperative Care of the Rhinoplasty Patient

Chapter

Abstract

A methodical and consistent postoperative sequence of care can help ensure optimal results in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Record keeping and surgical diagrams are described, and external splinting, septal splinting, perioperative medications, and intranasal packing are discussed. Managing suboptimal results and deformities such as the pollybeak deformity, supratip taping, revision surgery, deviation, and skin changes are covered. Meticulous attention to detail in the operating room and in the postoperative period is paramount to achieving success in rhinoplasty. The early postoperative evaluation serves to alert the surgeon to potential complications and allows early intervention to improve suboptimal results.

Keywords

Toxic Shock Syndrome Nasal Dorsum Soft Tissue Envelope Vasomotor Rhinitis Atrophic Rhinitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn MS, Maas CS, Monhian N (2003) A novel, comfortable, rapidly setting nasal splint material. Arch Facial Plast Surg 5(2):189–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cunningham MW, Yousif NJ, Sanger JR, Gingrass RP, Matloub HS (1984) Aquaplast for nasal splinting. Ann Plast Surg 13(4):357–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guyuron B (1989) Is packing after septorhinoplasty necessary? A randomized study. Plast Reconstr Surg 84(1):41–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Guyuron B, Vaughan C (1995) Evaluation of stents following septoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 19(1):75–77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook JA, Murrant NJ, Evans KL, Lavelle RJ (1992) Intranasal splints and their effects on intranasal adhesions and septal stability. Clin Otolaryngol 17(1):24–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malki D, Quine SM, Pfleiderer AG (1999) Nasal splints, revisited. J Laryngol Otol 113(8):725–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gottschalk GH (1978) An improved septoplasty: the microsurgical suture technique. Ann Plast Surg 1(1):30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Orlandi RR, Lanza D (2004) Is nasal packing necessary following endoscopic sinus surgery? Laryngoscope 114(9):1541–1544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jacobson JA, Kasworm EM (1986) Toxic shock syndrome after nasal surgery. Case reports and analysis of risk factors. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112(3):329–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wagner R, Toback JM (1986) Toxic shock syndrome following septoplasty using plastic septal splints. Laryngoscope 96(6):609–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kara CO, Gokalan I (1999) Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 104(7):2213–2218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Griffies WS, Kennedy K, Gasser C, Frankhauser C, Taylor R (1989) Steroids in rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 99(11):1161–1164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman DF, Cook TA, Quatela VC, Wang TD, Brownrigg PJ, Brummet RE (1991) Steroids and rhinoplasty. A double-blind study. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 117(9):990–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berinstein TH, Bane SM, Cupp CL, DeMarco JK, Hunsaker DH (1998) Steroid use in rhinoplasty: an objective assessment of postoperative edema. Ear Nose Throat J 77(1):40–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Classen DC, Evans RS, Pestotnik SL, Horn SD, Menlove RL, Burke JP (1992) The timing of prophylactic administration of antibiotics and the risk of surgical-wound infection. N Eng J Med 26(5):281–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bandhauer F, Buhl D, Grossenbacher R (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in rhinosurgery. Am J Rhinol 16(3):135–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perrotti JA, Castor SA, Perez PC, Zins JE (2002) Antibiotic use in aesthetic surgery: a national survey and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(5):1685–1693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lyle WG, Outlaw K, Krizek TJ, Koss N, Payne WG, Robson MC (2001) Prophylactic antibiotics in plastic surgery: trends of use over 25 years of an evolving specialty. Aesthetic Surg J 23:117Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tomooka LT, Murphy C, Davidson TM (2000) Clinical study and literature review of nasal irrigation. Laryngoscope 110(7):1189–1193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shone GR, Yardley MP, Knight LC (1990) Mucociliary function in the early weeks after nasal surgery. Rhinology 28(4):265–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cochran CS, Marple BF (2004) Rhinologic pharmacotherapy in rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 12(4):415–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hanasono MM, Kridel RW, Pastorek NJ, Glasgold MJ, Koch RJ (2002) Correction of the soft tissue pollybeak using triamcinalone injection. Arch Facial Plast Surg 4(1):26–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guyuron B, DeLuca L, Lash R (2000) Supratip deformity: a closer look. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldman MP, Bennet RG (1987) Treatment of telangiectasia: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol 17(2 Pt 1):167–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Padovan IF, Jugo SB (1991) The complications of external rhinoplasty. Ear Nose Throat J 70(7):454–456PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dicken CH (1990) Argon laser treatment of the red nose. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 16(1):33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noe JM, Finely J, Rosen S, Arndt KA (1981) Postrhinoplasty “red nose”: differential diagnosis and treatment by laser. Plast Reconstr Surg 67(5):661–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rees TD (1998) Point and counterpoint, parts x, xi, and xii. In: Rees TD, Baker DC, Tabbal N (eds) Rhinoplasty problems and controversies – a discussion with the experts. Mosby, St. Louis, p 368Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Scheepers JH, Quaba AA (1994) Clinical experience in the treatment of the “red nose” using the flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18(1):57–60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raulin C, Weiss RA, Schonermark MP (1997) Treatment of essential telangiectasias with an intense pulsed light source (PhotoDerm VL). Dermatol Surg 23(10):941–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mark KA, Sparacio RM, Voigt A, Marenus K, Sarnoff DS (2003) Objective and quantitative improvement of rosacea-associated erythema after intense pulsed light treatment. Dermatol Surg 29(6):600–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gunter Center for Aesthetics and Cosmetic SurgeryDallasUSA
  2. 2.Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck SurgeryUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at DallasDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations