Skip to main content

Management of the Informal by Situational Project Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovation Management by Promoting the Informal

Abstract

The design approach “situational project management” developed for management of the informal is directed at dynamic and flexible project control, where the characteristics of innovation work are considered in particular. It focuses on research and development processes in an innovative company for measurement and control technology. The networked innovation processes are characterized by cooperation with partnered companies and research institutions from the local region. This chapter describes the manner in which innovation processes of the company can be continuously promoted and developed further using situational project management in the dimensions of goal definition, scheduling, the type of procedure and type of control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For her support concerning the empirical investigation and the preparation of the results I like to thank Franziska Markert.

  2. 2.

    The analysis of a comparison of management texts from the 1960s and 1990s provides an empirical basis for the investigation cited. With respect to the number of references to the texts investigated, the “logique industrielle” (industrial logic) in both timeframes – though with a downward trend – takes first place while references to a “logique de réseau” (network logic) have increased considerably and climbed from fifth place in the 1960s to second place in the 1990s (Boltanski and Chiapello 1999, pp. 204, 643–662).

  3. 3.

    A survey of 44 networks provided information on the importance of management instruments deployed, whereupon the highest priority was given to project management (Stadlbauer et al. 2007, p. 264–267).

  4. 4.

    MessTech is an anonymized designation. The names of the projects used below and the companies cooperating with MessTech have also been anonymized.

  5. 5.

    The financial crisis, which began to unfold in the second half of 2008, was particularly responsible for project disruptions. This led some of the companies cooperating with MessTech to cancel or temporarily discontinue innovative project activities. Some of the innovation projects, which were interrupted, were reactivated at the end of 2010/beginning of 2011.

  6. 6.

    This quotation and the subsequent ones have been gleaned from the empirical investigations in the KES-MI project.

  7. 7.

    “Jugend forscht” (youth research) is a German youth science competition.

References

  • Ahn MJ, Zwikael O, Bednarek R (2010) Technological invention to product innovation: A project management approach. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 28, No 6, pp 559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Crawford L, Ward S (2006) Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 24, No 8, pp 687–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bea FX, Scheurer S, Hesselmann S (2008) Projektmanagement. Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Böhle F, Meil P (2003) Das Unplanbare bewältigen. In: Butz C, Papesch G, Wilhelms G (eds) Tagungsband der Fachtagung Projektmanagement in Zeiten des Wandels. Universität Augsburg, pp 36–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski L, Chiapello È (1999) Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Gallimard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolte A, Porschen S (2006) Die Organisation des Informellen. VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer R (2004) Une théorie du capitalisme est-elle possible? Odile Jacob, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt RS (2008) Industry Performance and Indirect Access to Structural Holes. In: Baum JAC, Rowley TJ (eds) Advances in Strategic Management. Emerald Group Pub Ltd, Bingley, pp 315–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2000) Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society. In: British Journal of Sociology Vol 51, No 1, pp 5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial Innovation. In: Chesbrough H, Vanhaverbeke W, West J (eds) Open Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicmil S, Williams T, Thomas J, Hodgson D (2006) Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 24, No 8, pp 675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicmil S, Cooke-Davies T, Crawford L, Richardson K (2009) Exploring the Complexity of Projects: Implications of Complexity Theory for Project Management Practice. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford L, Pollack J (2004) Hard and soft projects: a framework for analysis. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 22, No 8, pp 645–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P (2001) Introduction: Making Sense of the Contemporary Firm and Prefiguring Its Future. In: DiMaggio P (ed) The Twenty-First-Century Firm. University Press, Princeton, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Engwall M (2003) No project is an island: linking projects to history and context. In: Research Policy, Vol 32, No 5, pp 789–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR (2006) Mastering the Law of Requisite Variety with Differentiated Networks. In: Heckscher C, Adler PS (eds) The Firm as a Collaborative Community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 179–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabher G (2002) Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context. In: Regional Studies, Vol 36, No 3, pp 205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher G (2004) Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? In: European Urban and Regional Studies, Vol 11, No 2, pp 103–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher G, Ibert O (2006) Bad company? The ambiguity of personal knowledge networks. In: Journal of Economic Geography Vol 6, No 3, pp 251–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The Strength of Weak Ties. In: American Journal of Sociology Vol 78, No 6, pp 1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1983) The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. In: Randall C (ed) Sociological Theory. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 201–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. In: American Journal of Sociology Vol 91, No 3, pp 481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (2005) The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes. In: Journal of Economic Perspectives Vol 19, No 1, pp 33–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hab G, Wagner R (2006) Projektmanagement in der Automobilindustrie. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Habler T, Bürgermeister M (2010) Erfahrungsgeleitetes Projektmanagement im Kontext produktionsnaher Dienstleistungen. In: Heidling E, Böhle F, Habler T (eds) Produktion mit Dienstleistung. Rainer Hampp Verlag, München and Mering, pp 203–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidling E (2011) Strategische Netzwerke. In: Weyer J (ed) Soziale Netzwerke. Oldenbourg Verlag, München, pp 135–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaafari A (2003) Project Management in the Age of Complexity and Change. In: Project Management Journal, Vol 34, No 4, pp 47–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen D, Diaz-Bone, R (2011) Netzwerkstrukturen als soziales Kapital. In: Weyer J (ed) Soziale Netzwerke. Oldenbourg Verlag, München, pp 71–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalkowski P, Mickler O (2009) Antinomien des Projektmanagements. Edition sigma, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning S (2008) Embedding projects in multiple contexts – a structuration perspective. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 26, No 1, pp 30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meil P, Heidling E (2006) Entfernung überbrücken – Verteilte Arbeit entlang internationaler Wertschöpfungsketten. In: Dunkel W, Sauer D (eds) Von der Allgegenwart der verschwindenden Arbeit. Edition sigma, Berlin, pp 145–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil P, Heidling E, Rose H (2004) Erfahrungsgeleitetes Arbeiten bei verteilter Arbeit. In: Böhle F, Pfeiffer S, Sevsay-Tegethoff N (eds) Die Bewältigung des Unplanbaren. Edition sigma, Berlin, pp 180–198

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meskendahl S, Jonas D, Kock A, Gemünden HG (2011) Wie Unternehmen erfolgreich ihr Projektportfolio managen. In: projektMANAGEMENT aktuell, No 1, pp 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2008) Open Innovation in Global Networks. OECD Publications, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Perminova O, Gustafsson M, Wikström K (2008) Defining uncertainty in projects – a new perspective. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 26, No 1, pp 73–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack J (2007) The changing paradigms of project management. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 25, No 3, pp 266–274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Porschen S (2008) Austausch impliziten Erfahrungswissens. VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW (1990) Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. In: Research in Organizational Behavior Vol 12, pp 295–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW (2001) The Capitalist Firm in the Twenty-First-Century. In: DiMaggio P (ed) The Twenty-First-Century Firm. University Press, Princeton, pp 33–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell WW, Grodal S (2005) Networks of innovators. In: Fagerberg J, Mowery DC, Nelson RR (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 56–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel C (2006) A Real-Time Revolution in Routines. In: Heckscher C, Adler PS (eds) The Firm as a Collaborative Community. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 106–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapsed J, Salter A (2004) Postcards from the Edge: Local Communities, Global Programs and Boundary Objects. In: Organization Studies Vol 25, No 9, pp 1515–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schelle H (2010) Projekte zum Erfolg führen – Projektmanagement systematisch und kompakt. Deutscher Taschenbuchverlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Doerr L, Powell WW (2005) Networks and Economic Life. In: Smelser N, Swedberg R (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Russell Sage Foundation and Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 379–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderholm A (2008) Project management of unexpected events. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 26, No 1, pp 80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadlbauer F, Hess T, Wittenberg S (2007) Managementpraxis in Unternehmensnetzwerken. Eine Analyse des Instrumenteneinsatzes in deutschen Netzwerken am Anfang des 21. Jahrhunderts. In: Berghoff H, Sydow J (eds) Unternehmerische Netzwerke. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J (2006) Management von Netzwerkorganisationen – Zum Stand der Forschung. In: Sydow J (ed) Management von Netzwerkorganisationen. Gabler, Wiesbaden, pp 387–472

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J, Müller-Seitz G (2009) Strategien, Projekte und Praktiken – Eine Praxisperspektive auf strategisches Projektmanagement. In: Wagner R (ed) Projekt als Strategie – Strategie als Projekt. Verlag GPM Deutsche Gesellschaft für Projektmanagement e.V., Nürnberg, pp 62–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J, Windeler A (2004) Projektnetzwerke: Management von (mehr als) temporären Systemen. In: Sydow J, Windeler A (eds) Organisation der Content-Produktion. VS – Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 37–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow J, Lindkvist L, DeFillippi R (2004) Project-Based Organizations, Embeddedness and Repositories of Knowledge: Editorial. In: Organization Studies Vol 25, No 9, pp 1475–1489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuderoz C (2006) Un siècle d’histoire du management: Une introduction. In: Thuderoz C (ed) Histoire et sociologie du management. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne, pp 3–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington KB, Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2009) Networks, Propinquity and Innovation in Knowledge-Intensive Industries. In: Administrative Science Quarterly Vol 54, No 1, pp 90–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter M, Smith C, Morris P, Cicmil S (2006) Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network. In: International Journal of Project Management Vol 24, No 8, pp 638–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eckhard Heidling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heidling, E. (2012). Management of the Informal by Situational Project Management. In: Böhle, F., Bürgermeister, M., Porschen, S. (eds) Innovation Management by Promoting the Informal. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28015-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28015-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28014-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28015-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics