Advertisement

A Complex Model for Distributing Competences That Requires Further Safeguards

  • Paloma Biglino Campos
Chapter

Abstract

The distribution of competences between State and Autonomous Communities in Spain has recently undergone a number of major changes resulting from the reform of the Statutes of Autonomy. The present article seeks to show that the bulk of the criticism aimed at these new laws and at Constitutional Court jurisprudence is in fact due to the actual model of power distribution to emerge from our territorial organisation. This is based on a power sharing system that, amongst other difficulties, leads to a strengthening the Constitutional Court’s role as guardian of territorial pluralism. In order to avoid such a situation, other procedural safeguards could be adopted that, whilst maintaining their legal status, might integrate the will of the Autonomous Communities within the State through Parliament.

Keywords

Member State Legal System Power Allocation Central Authority Autonomous Community 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arroyo Gil, A. La reforma constitucional del federalismo alemán. Estudio crítico de la 52a Ley de modificación de la Ley Fundamental de Bonn, 28 August 2006, Barcelona, 2009, page 48 et seqGoogle Scholar
  2. Biglino Campos, P. Federalismo de integración y devolución: el debate sobre la competencia, Madrid, 2007, page 130 et seqGoogle Scholar
  3. De la Cuadra-Salcedo Janini, T. “Los principios de competencia y prevalencia como regla de resolución de conflictos en el Estado Autonómico,” in Biglino Campos, P; Mapelli Marchena, C. (dir.), Garantías del pluralismo territorial, Madrid, 2011, p. 71 et seqGoogle Scholar
  4. Frickey P.P. Smith, S.S. “Judicial Review, the Congressional Process, and the Federalism Cases: An Interdisciplinary Critique” 111 Yale Law Journal, 1707 (2002), page 1728Google Scholar
  5. H. Linde in “Due Process of Lawmaking,” 55 Nebraska Law Review 197 (1976)Google Scholar
  6. J. Madison, The Federalist, on the new Constitution, Hallowell [Me.] Masters, Smith & co., 1857, p. 47Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations