Israeli Jewish and Arab Students’ Gendering of Mathematics

  • Helen J. Forgasz
  • David Mittelberg
Part of the Advances in Mathematics Education book series (AME)


In English-speaking, Western countries, mathematics has traditionally been viewed as a “male domain”, a discipline more suited to males than to females. Recent data from Australian and American students who had been administered two instruments (Leder and Forgasz 2002) tapping their beliefs about the gendering of mathematics appeared to challenge this traditional, gender-stereotyped view of the discipline. The two instruments were translated into Hebrew and Arabic and administered to large samples of grade 9 students attending Jewish and Arab schools in northern Israel. The aims of this study were to determine if the views of these two culturally different groups of students differed and whether within group gender differences were apparent. The quantitative data alone could not provide explanations for any differences found. However, in conjunction with other sociological data on the differences between the two groups in Israeli society more generally, possible explanations for any differences found were explored. The findings for the Jewish Israeli students were generally consistent with prevailing Western gendered views on mathematics; the Arab Israeli students held different views that appeared to parallel cultural beliefs and the realities of life for this cultural group.


Significant Gender Difference Mathematics Achievement Australian Student Jewish Student Gender Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Australian Council for Educational Research [ACER] (2007). Mathematical Literacy in PISA 2006. Retrieved on 17 December 2007 from:
  2. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 719–747. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199908)36:6<719::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-R. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayalon, H. (2002). Mathematics and science course taking among Arab students in Israel: A case of unexpected gender equality. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(1), 63–80. doi: 10.3102/01623737024001063. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Haidar, A. (Ed.) (2005). Arab society in Israel: Population, society and economics (1). Tel-Aviv: Van Leer Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House (in Hebrew). Google Scholar
  5. Barkatsas, A. N., Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (2002). The stereotyping of mathematics: Gender and cultural factors. Themes in Education, 3(2), 91–216. Google Scholar
  6. Birenbaum, M., & Nasser, F. (2006). Ethnic and gender differences in mathematics achievement and in dispositions towards the study of mathematics. Learning and Instruction, 16, 26–40. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.004. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandell, G., Nyström, P., & Sundqvist, C. (2004). Mathematics—a male domain? Retrieved 9 April 2008 from
  8. Central Bureau of Statistics. Israel (2007). Israel in figures. 2007. Retrieved 9 April 2008 from
  9. Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (2000). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge. Social class, sex and problem solving. Buckingham: Open University Press. Google Scholar
  10. Fennema, E. (1974). Mathematics learning and the sexes: A review. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 5, 126–139. doi: 10.2307/748949. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. (1976). Fennema–Sherman mathematics attitude scales. JSAS: Catalog of selected documents in psychology, 6(1), 31 (Ms. No. 1225). Google Scholar
  12. Fogel-Bizau, S. (2003). ‘The second earner’ in the era of globalization: Women in the Israeli labor market (in Hebrew). Society, 8. Accessed 28 December 2006 from
  13. Forgasz, H. J. (2001). Mathematics: Still a male domain? Australian findings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Education Research Association [AERA] as part of the symposium, Mathematics: Still a male domain? Seattle, USA, 10–14 April. [ERIC document: ED452071.].
  14. Forgasz, H. J. (2006a). Australian year 12 mathematics enrolments: Patterns and trends—Past and present. International Centre of Excellence for Education in Mathematics. Accessed 28 December 2006.
  15. Forgasz, H. J. (2006b). Australian year 12 “Intermediate” level mathematics enrolments 2000–2004: Trends and patterns. In P. Grootenboer, R. Zevenbergen & M. Chinnappan (Eds.), Identities cultures and learning spaces. Proceedings of the 29th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 211–220). Adelaide: MERGA. Google Scholar
  16. Forgasz, H. J., & Leder, G. C. (1996). Mathematics and English: Stereotyped domains? Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 18(1, 2 & 3), 129–137. Google Scholar
  17. Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Gardner, P. (1999). The Fennema–Sherman Mathematics as a male domain scale reexamined. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 342–348. doi: 10.2307/749839. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forgasz, H. J., Leder, G. C., & Kloosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(4), 389–420. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0604_2. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kashti, O. (2007, 28 November). Wide gaps between test scores in Jewish, Arab schools. Haaretz. Google Scholar
  20. Greene, B. A., DeBacker, T. K., Ravindran, B., & Krows, A. J. (1999). Goals, values, and beliefs as predictors of achievement and effort in high school mathematics classes. Sex Roles, 40, 421–458. doi: 10.1023/A:1018871610174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women’s math achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.198. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lavy, V. (1998). Disparities between Arabs and Jews in school resources and student achievement in Israel. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47(1), 174–192. doi: 10.1086/452391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Leder, G. C., & Forgasz, H. J. (2002). Two new instruments to probe attitudes about gender and mathematics. ERIC, Resources in Education (RIE). [ERIC document number: ED463312]. Google Scholar
  24. Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Solar, C. (1996). Research and intervention programs in mathematics education: A gendered issue. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education, Part 2 (pp. 945–985). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, M. R., & Koehler, M. S. (1993). Internal influences on gender differences in mathematics. In E. Fennema & G. C. Leder (Eds.), Mathematics and gender (pp. 60–95). Lucia: St Queensland University Press. Google Scholar
  26. Ministry of Education. Israel (2007). Matriculation examination data 2006 (translation). Retrieved on 8 November 2007 from
  27. Mittelberg, D., & Lev-Ari, L. (1999). Confidence in mathematics and its consequences: Gender differences among Israeli Jewish and Arab youth. Gender and Education, 11(1), 75–92. doi: 10.1080/09540259920771. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Google Scholar
  29. Nasser, F., & Birenbaum, M. (2005). Modeling mathematics achievement of Jewish and Arab eighth graders in Israel: The effects of learner-related variables. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(3), 277–302. doi: 10.1080/13803610500101108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD (nd). First results from PISA 2003. Executive summary. Accessed 12 December 2006.
  31. OECD (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow’s world. Vol. 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reyes, L. H. (1984). Affective variables and mathematics education. Elementary School Journal, 84, 558–581. doi: 10.1086/461384. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiedemann, J. (2000). Parents’ gender stereotypes and teachers’ beliefs as predictors of children’s concept of their mathematical ability in elementary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 308–315. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.144. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zohar, A. (2005). Boys’ and girls’ learning in mathematics and the sciences. Unpublished internal report, Department of Gender Equality, Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport, Israel. Google Scholar
  35. Zuzovsky, R. (2006). Capturing the dynamics that led to the narrowing achievement gap between Hebrew-speaking and Arabic-speaking schools in Israel: Findings from TIMSS 1999 and 2003. Retrieved on 8 November 2007 from

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Oranim Academic College of EducationTivonIsrael

Personalised recommendations