Foreign Body Retrieval

  • Miltiadis E. Krokidis
  • Tarun Sabharwal
  • Andreas Adam
Chapter

Abstract

Percutaneous foreign body retrieval is a safe, minimally invasive and effective technique that may offer a valid solution when necessary. Nevertheless, careful use and appropriate placement of intravascular devices would prevent the loss of foreign objects. In the event of inadvertent embolization, knowledge, experience and adaptability should permit a safe percutaneous removal.

Keywords

Foreign Body Inferior Vena Cava Inferior Vena Cava Filter Inferior Vena Cava Wall Catheter Fragment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Cope C (1962) Intravascular breakage of Seldinger spring wire guides. JAMA 180:1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomas J, Sinclair-Smith B, Bloomfield D et al (1964) Non-surgical retrieval of a broken segment of steel spring guide from the right atrium and inferior vena cava. Circulation 30:106–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henley FT, Ballard JW (1969) Percutaneous removal of flexible foreign body from the heart. Radiology 92:176PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Curry JL (1969) Recovery of detached intravascular catheter on guide wire fragments: a proposed method. AJR Am J Roentgenol 105:894–896Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dotter CT, Rösch J, Bilbao MK (1971) Transluminal extraction of catheter and guide fragments from the heart and great vessels: 29 collected cases. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 111:467–472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Uflacker R, Lima S, Melichar AC (1986) Intravascular foreign bodies: percutaneous retrieval. Radiology 160:731–735PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Egglin TK, Dickey KW, Rosenblatt M et al (1995) Retrieval of intravascular foreign bodies: experience in 32 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164:1259–1264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Slonim SM, Dake MD, Razavi MK et al (1999) Management of misplaced or migrated endovascular stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:851–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prahlow JA, Obryant TJ, Barnard JJ (1997) Cardiac perforation due to wallstent embolization: a fatal complication of the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure. Radiology 205:170–172PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin L, Strahan K, Murphy G (1997) Retrieval of intravascular iatrogenic foreign bodies using nonsurgical techniques. Postgrad Med J 73:664–666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischer RG, Ferreyro R (1978) Evaluation of current techniques for nonsurgical removal of intravascular iatrogenic foreign bodies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 130(3):541–548Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernhardt LC, Wegner GP, Mendenhall JT (1970) Intravenous catheter embolization to the pulmonary artery. Chest 57(4):329–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richardson JD, Grover FL, Trinkle JK (1974) Intravenous catheter emboli. Experience with twenty cases and collective review. Am J Surg 128(6):722–727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Motta Leal Filho JM, Carnevale FC, Nasser F et al (2010) Endovascular techniques and procedures, methods for removal of intravascular foreign bodies. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc 25(2):202–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hinke DH, Zandt-Stastny DA, Goodman LR et al (1990) Pinch-off syndrome: a complication of implantable subclavian venous access devices. Radiology 177(2):353–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schlangen JT, Debets JM, Wils JA (1995) The “pinch-off phenomenon”: a radiological symptom for potential fracture of an implanted permanent subclavian catheter system. Eur J Radiol 20(2):112–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballarini C, Intra M, Pisani Ceretti A et al (1999) Complications of subcutaneous infusion port in the general oncology population. Oncology 56(2):97–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kock HJ, Pietsch M, Krause U, Wilke H, Eigler FW (1998) Implantable vascular access systems: experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems. World J Surg 22(1):12–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bloomberg DA (1978) The non surgical retrieval of intracardiac foreign bodies: an international survey. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 4:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Selby EL, Tegtmeyer CJ, Bittner GM (1990) Experience with new retrieval forceps for foreign body retrieval in the vascular, urinary and biliary systems. Radiology 176:535–538PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dondelinger RF, Lepontre B, Kurdziel JC (1991) Percutaneous vascular foreign body retrieval: experience of an 11-year period. Eur J Radiol 12:4–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Siegel EL, Robertson EF (1993) Percutaneous transfemoral retrieval of a free-floating titanium Greenfield filter with an Amplatz gooseneck snare. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:565–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cekirge S, Weiss JP, Foster RG et al (1993) Percutaneous retrieval of foreign bodies: experience with the nitinol gooseneck snare. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:805–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hartnell GG, Jordan SJ (1995) Percutaneous removal of a misplaced Palmaz stent with a coaxial snare technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 6:799–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Elsner M, Pfeifel A, Kasper W (1996) Intracoronary loss of balloon mounted stents: successful retrieval with a 2 mm-Microsnare device. Cathet Cardovasc Diagn 39:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schatz RA, Baim DS, Leon M et al (1991) Clinical experience of Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent: initial results of a multicenter study. Circulation 83:148–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pfammatter T, Hechelhammer L, Pfiffner R (2009) A “Buddy Wire” technique for successful OptEase filter retrieval. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:656–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Ha TG, Vinokur O, Lorenz J et al (2009) Techniques used for difficult retrievals of the Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter: experience in 32 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bochenek KM, Aruny JE, Tal MG (2003) Right atrial migration and percutaneous retrieval of a Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:1207–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fotiadis NI, Sabharwal T, Dourado R et al (2008) Technical error during deployment leads to vena cava filter migration and massive pulmonary embolism. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(Suppl 2):S174–S176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wolf F, Schernthaner RE, Dirisamer A et al (2008) Endovascular management of lost or misplaced intravascular objects: experiences of 12 years. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(3):563–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gabelmann A, Kramer S, Gorich J (2001) Percutaneous retrieval of lost or misplaced intravascular objects. Am J Roentgenol 176:1509–1513Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rubenstein L, Chun A, Chew M et al (2007) Loop-snare technique for difficult inferior vena cava filter retrievals. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20:1315–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuo WT, Bostaph A, Loh C et al (2006) Retrieval of trapped Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filters: snare-over-guidewire loop technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1845–1849PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mallmann CV, Wolf KJ, Wacker FK (2008) Retrieval of vascular foreign bodies using a self-made wire snare. Acta Radiol 49(10):1124–1128PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sheth R, Someshwar V, Warawdekar G (2007) Percutaneous retrieval of misplaced intravascular foreign objects with the Dormia basket: an effective solution. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 30:48–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sanchez RB, Roberts AC, Valji K et al (1992) Wallstent misplacement during transjugular placement of an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: retrieval with a loop snare. AJR Am J Roentgenol 159:129–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yedlicka JW Jr, Carson JE, Hunter DW et al (1991) Nitinol gooseneck snare for removal of foreign bodies: experimental study and clinical evaluation. Radiology 178:691–693PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miltiadis E. Krokidis
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tarun Sabharwal
    • 1
  • Andreas Adam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyGuy’s and St Thomas’ HospitalLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Radiology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS TrustSt Thomas’ HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations