Endovascular Treatment of Iliac Artery Disease

  • Nathalie Moreels
  • Frank Vermassen


Aorto-iliac lesions account for about one-third of the predominant lesions in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Claudication is the most prevalent symptom. Thanks to improvements in materials and techniques endovascular therapy has become the standard of care as the primary treatment in the vast majority of these lesions. Even in the presence of more extensive disease, excellent results can be obtained that rival those obtained with open surgery. Endovascular treatment has the advantage of being less invasive and is associated with lower periprocedural mortality and major morbidity rates.

Angioplasty alone is indicated in non-ostial stenotic lesions. Stenting is indicated in more extensive lesions, in occlusions, when the result of angioplasty is not satisfactory or when the chance for early restenosis is high such as in ostial or highly calcified eccentric lesions. Balloon-expandable and self-expandable stents yield about the same results, and the choice between both should therefore be based on the intrinsic properties of the stents and the characteristics of the lesion. The precise place of covered stents remains to be determined.

Complications related to the procedure are rare and can often be avoided by careful planning and meticulous technique. Most of the complications can be treated endovascularly.


Iliac Artery Endovascular Treatment Common Iliac Artery Critical Limb Ischaemia Angiographic Catheter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Dotter C, Judkins M (1964) Transluminal treatment of arteriosclerotic obstruction: description of a new technique and a preliminary report of its application. Circulation 30:654–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grüntzig A, Hopff H (1974) Percutaneous recanalization after chronic arterial occlusion with a new dilator-catheter (modification of the Dotter technique). Dtsch Med Wochenschr 99:2502–2510, 2511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Palmaz JC, Sibbitt RR, Reuter SR et al (1985) Expandable intraluminal graft: a preliminary study. Work in progress. Radiology 156:73–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anon (2000) Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 31:S1–S288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al (2007) Inter-Society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45:S5–S67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tendera M, Aboyans V, Bartelink ML et al (2011) ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral artery disease. Eur Heart J 32:2851–2906PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bosch JL, Hunink MGM (1997) Meta-analysis of the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Radiology 204:87–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tetteroo E, van der Graaf Y, Bosch JL (1998) Randomised comparison of primary stent placement versus primary angioplasty followed by selective stent placement in patients with iliac artery occlusive disease. Lancet 351:1153–1159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mwipatayi BP, Thomas S, Wong J et al (2011) A comparison of covered vs bare expandable stents for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 54:1561–1570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schroe H, Vercauteren S, Lansink W et al (2012) Long-term results of the Treatment of Iliac in-stent Restenosis with a Balloon-expandable Stent Graft. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg (accepted for publication)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henry M, Amor M, Thevenot G et al (1995) Palmaz stent placement in iliac and femoropopliteal arteries: primary and secondary patency in 310 patients with 2–4 year follow-up. Radiology 197:167–174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vorwerk D, Gunther RW, Schurmann K, Wendt G (1996) Aortic and iliac stenosis: follow-up results of stent placement after insufficient balloon angioplasty in 118 cases. Radiology 198:45–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jongkind V, Akkersdijk GJ, Yeung KK, Wisselink W (2010) A systematic review of endovascular treatment of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 52:1376–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haulon S, Mounier-Vehier C, Gaxotte V et al (2002) Percutaneous reconstruction of the aortoiliac bifurcation with the “kissing stents” technique: long-term follow-up in 106 patients. J Endovasc Ther 9:363–368PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hans SS, DeSantis D, Siddiqui R, Khoury M (2008) Results of endovascular therapy and aortobifemoral grafting for Transatlantic Inter-Society type C and D aortoiliac occlusive disease. Surgery 144:583–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kashyap VS, Pavkov ML, Bena JF, Sarac TP, O’Hara PJ, Lyden SP et al (2008) The management of severe aortoiliac occlusive disease: endovascular therapy rivals open reconstruction. J Vasc Surg 48:1451–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sixt S, Alawied AK, Rastan A et al (2008) Acute and long-term outcome of endovascular therapy for aortoiliac lesions stratified according to the TASC classification: a single center experience. J Endovasc Ther 15:408–416PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Vascular and Thoracic SurgeryGhent University HospitalGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations