Skip to main content

Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions

Abstract

A patent foramen ovale (PFO) is quite common and persists in approximately 20–30% of adults. In combination with predisposing morphologic and hemodynamic conditions, this remnant interatrial communication promotes thromboembolic events, most notably cerebrovascular events. Feasible treatment strategies include antithrombotic medication (antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation), surgery, or transcatheter defect closure. Though to date no randomized trials exist showing that medical therapy versus placebo in any patient population with cryptogenic stroke is truly effective in preventing recurrent events, current guidelines promote medical therapy over endovascular or surgical PFO closure as a first-line therapy in patients with cryptogenic stroke and a PFO. This chapter reviews the pathophysiology of presumed paradoxical embolism through a PFO, current guidelines, the history and current status of device technology, and critical aspects to consider when facing a residual shunt after transcatheter PFO closure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hara H, Virmani R, Ladich E, Mackey-Bojack S, Titus J, Reisman M, Gray W, Nakamura M, Mooney M, Poulose A et al (2005) Patent foramen ovale: current pathology, pathophysiology, and clinical status. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(9):1768–1776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Castro S, Cartoni D, Fiorelli M, Rasura M, Anzini A, Zanette EM, Beccia M, Colonnese C, Fedele F, Fieschi C et al (2000) Morphological and functional characteristics of patent foramen ovale and their embolic implications. Stroke 31(10):2407–2413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Overell JR, Bone I, Lees KR (2000) Interatrial septal abnormalities and stroke: a meta-analysis of case–control studies. Neurology 55(8):1172–1179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rigatelli G, Dell’Avvocata F, Giordan M, Braggion G, Aggio S, Chinaglia M, Roncon L, Cardaioli P, Chen JP (2009) Embolic implications of combined risk factors in patients with patent foramen ovale (the CARPE criteria): consideration for primary prevention closure? J Interv Cardiol 22(4):398–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Homma S, DiTullio MR, Sacco RL, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP (2004) Age as a determinant of adverse events in medically treated cryptogenic stroke patients with patent foramen ovale. Stroke 35(9):2145–2149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meissner I, Khandheria BK, Heit JA, Petty GW, Sheps SG, Schwartz GL, Whisnant JP, Wiebers DO, Covalt JL, Petterson TM et al (2006) Patent foramen ovale: innocent or guilty? Evidence from a prospective population-based study. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(2):440–445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Handke M, Harloff A, Olschewski M, Hetzel A, Geibel A (2007) Patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke in older patients. N Engl J Med 357(22):2262–2268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Del Sette M, Angeli S, Leandri M, Ferriero G, Bruzzone GL, Finocchi C, Gandolfo C (1998) Migraine with aura and right-to-left shunt on transcranial Doppler: a case–control study. Cerebrovasc Dis 8(6):327–330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng TO (2000) Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale: a definitive treatment for platypnea-orthodeoxia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 51(1):120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Germonpre P (2005) Patent foramen ovale and diving. Cardiol Clin 23(1):97–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Srivastava TN, Payment MF (1997) Images in clinical medicine. Paradoxical embolism – thrombus in transit through a patent foramen ovale. N Engl J Med 337(10):681

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Raaphorst J, Wouda EJ (2005) Thrombus in transit through a patent foramen ovale: paradoxical embolism. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(9):1199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mas JL, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Zuber M, Cabanes L, Derumeaux G, Coste J (2001) Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med 345(24):1740–1746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Windecker S, Wahl A, Chatterjee T, Garachemani A, Eberli FR, Seiler C, Meier B (2000) Percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with paradoxical embolism: long-term risk of recurrent thromboembolic events. Circulation 101(8):893–898

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Homma S, Sacco RL, Di Tullio MR, Sciacca RR, Mohr JP (2003) Atrial anatomy in non-cardioembolic stroke patients: effect of medical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 42(6):1066–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Furlan A, Reisman M, Massaro J, Mauri L, Adams H, Albers G, Felberg R, Herrmann H, Kar S, Landzberg M, Raizner A, Wechsler L (2010) CLOSURE I: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the STARFlex® septal closure system versus best medical therapy in patients with a stroke or transient ischemic attack due to presumed paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale. Circulation 122:2215–2226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, Alberts MJ, Benavente O, Furie K, Goldstein LB, Gorelick P, Halperin J, Harbaugh R et al (2006) Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Circulation 113(10):e409–e449

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Messe SR, Silverman IE, Kizer JR, Homma S, Zahn C, Gronseth G, Kasner SE (2004) Practice parameter: recurrent stroke with patent foramen ovale and atrial septal aneurysm: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 62(7):1042–1050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Albers GW, Amarenco P, Easton JD, Sacco RL, Teal P (2008) Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 133(6 Suppl):630S–669S

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bridges ND, Hellenbrand W, Latson L, Filiano J, Newburger JW, Lock JE (1992) Transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale after presumed paradoxical embolism. Circulation 86(6):1902–1908

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Horst Sievert M.D., FSCAI, FACC, FESC, FICA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Franke, J., Wunderlich, N., Bertog, S.C., Sievert, H. (2013). Patent Foramen Ovale Closure. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) Catheter-Based Cardiovascular Interventions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27676-7_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27675-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27676-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics