Advertisement

Development and Teaching of Complex Skills in Invasive Procedures

  • Jeroen J. G. van Merriënboer
  • Irene Tjiam
Chapter

Abstract

Performance of surgical and interventional procedures is based on complex skills, which are constituted by a mix of cognitive and psychomotor skills, including decision making, reasoning, and problem-solving. In surgical and interventional training, the cognitive aspects are often neglected resulting in inconsistent and often inefficient transfer of training aims, that is, acquisition of high professional standards of procedural conduct along with the ability to confront new, unforeseen situations. This chapter describes a combination of cognitive task analysis (CTA) and four-component instructional design (4C/ID) as an approach to develop effective surgical and possibly interventional training that takes the cognitive aspects of performance into account. CTA captures accurate descriptions of knowledge, thought processes, and goal structure expert operators employ to effectively perform complex tasks. 4C/ID develops training programs on the basis of CTA results, consisting of four components: (1) learning tasks, (2) supportive information, (3) procedural information, and (4) part-task practice. The application of CTA and 4C/ID is illustrated by the example of conducting a nephrostomy guided by ultrasound.

Keywords

Supportive Information Psychomotor Skill Complex Skill Procedural Information Task Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Flin R, Youngson G, Yule S (2007) How do surgeons make intra-operative decisions? Qual Saf Health Care 16(3):235–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hall JC, Ellis C, Hamdorf J (2003) Surgeons and cognitive processes. Br J Surg 90(1):10–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L (2003) Taking the load of a learners’ mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educ Psychol 38(1):5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feldon DF, Timmerman BC, Stowe KA, Showman R (2010) Translating expertise into effective instruction: the impacts of Cognitive Task Analysis (CTA) on lab report quality and student retention in the biological science. J Res Sci Teach 47:1165–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pugh CM, DaRosa DA, Santacaterina S, Clark RE (2011) Faculty evaluation of simulation-based modules for assessment of intraoperative decision making. Surgery 149:534–542PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Velmahos GC, Toutouzas KG, Sillin LF, Chan L, Clark RE, Theodorou D, Maupin F (2004) Cognitive task analysis for teaching technical skills in an inanimate surgical skills laboratory. Am J Surg 187(1):114–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yates KA, Feldon DF (2010) Advancing the practice of cognitive task analysis: a call for taxonomic research. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 11(6):1464–1536Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clark RE, Feldon DF, van Merriënboer JJG, Yates KA, Early S (2008) Cognitive task analysis. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, van Merriënboer JJG, Driscoll MP (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 577–593Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gagné RM (1985) The conditions of learning, 4th edn. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horton A, Ratnam L, Madigan J, Munnike G, Patel U (2008) Nephrostomy – Why, how and what to look out for. Imaging 20(1):29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karim R, Sengupta S, Samanta S, Aich RK, Das U, Deb P (2010) Percutaneous nephrostomy by direct puncture technique: an observational study. I J Nephrol 20(2):84–88Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Gog T, Paas F, van Merriënboer JJG, Witte P (2005) Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. J Exp Psychol Appl 11(4):237–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson JR (1987) Skill acquisition: compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychol Rev 94:192–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fisk AD, Lee MD, Rogers WA (1991) Recombination of automatic processing components: the effects of transfer, reversal, and conflict situations. Hum Factors 33:267–280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Louis MR, Sutton RI (1991) Switching cognitive gears: from habits of mind to active thinking. Hum Relations 44:55–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van Merriënboer JJG (1997) Training complex cognitive skills. Educational Technology, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Kirschner PA (2007) Ten steps to complex learning. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Kester L (2008) Whole-task models in education. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, van Merriënboer JJG, Driscoll MP (eds) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 3rd edn. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 441–456Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schilling MA, Vidal P, Ployhart RE, Marangoni A (2003) Learning by doing something else: variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Manag Sci 49:39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Kester L, Paas F (2006) Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Appl Cogn Psychol 20:343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J (2005) Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 17:147–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J (2010) Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 44(1):85–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Van Merriënboer JJG (1990) Strategies for programming instruction in high school: program completion vs. program generation. J Educ Comput Res 6:265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Merriënboer JJG, de Croock MBM (1992) Strategies for computer-based programming instruction: program completion vs. program generation. J Educ Comput Res 8:365–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Renkl A, Atkinson RK (2003) Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: a cognitive load perspective. Educ Psychol 38:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lanzer P, Prechelt L (2011) Expanding the base for teaching percutaneous coronary interventions: the explicit approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:372–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Health Professions EducationMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of UrologyCatharina HospitalEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations