Abstract
A majority of consumers in industrialized countries today, when surveyed, report unpleasant sensations related to the use of consumer products, despite extensive premarket testing confirming a lack of irritant effect. Called “sensitive skin,” this phenomenon’s understanding has been hampered by the diversity of sensory perceptions and signs reported and by a lack of correlation between the two. Once thought to be a “princess and the pea” cultural complaint, sensitive skin is now known to be a genuine irritant response, although cultural factors do appear to play a role in consumer perceptions. Improved testing methods are now revealing the underlying physiological mechanisms of sensitive skin, which may ultimately prove to be comprised of subgroups of exaggerated sensitivity stemming from different physiological mechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jourdain R, de Lacharrière O, Bastien P, Maibach HI (2002) Ethnic variations in self-perceived sensitive skin: epidemiological survey. Contact Dermatitis 46(3):162–169
Farage MA, Katsarou A, Maibach HI (2006) Sensory, clinical and physiological factors in sensitive skin: a review. Contact Dermatitis 55(1):1–14
Pons-Guiraud A (2004) Sensitive skin: a complex and multifactorial syndrome. J Cosmet Dermatol 3(3):145–148
Marriott M, Holmes J, Peters L, Cooper K, Rowson M, Basketter DA (2005) The complex problem of sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 53(2):93–99
Farage MA (2005) Are we reaching the limits or our ability to detect skin effects with our current testing and measuring methods for consumer products? Contact Dermatitis 52(6):297–303
Farage MA, Maibach HI (2008) Sensitive skin syndrome: sensory response and classification. Cosmet Toil 123(7):26–30
Farage MA, Maibach HI (2010) Sensitive skin: closing in on a physiological cause. Contact Dermatitis 62(3):137–149
Johnson A, Page D (1992) Making sense of sensitive skin. Congress of the International Federation of Society of Cosmetic Chemists, Yokohama, Poster 700
Morizot F, Guinot C, Lopez S, Le Fur I, Tschachler E, Wood C (2000) Sensitive skin: analysis of symptoms, perceived causes and possible mechanisms. Cosmet Toil 115:83–89
Willis CM, Shaw S, De Lacharrière O, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdain R, Bastien P, Wilkinson JD (2001) Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 145(2):258–263
Farage MA (2009) How do perceptions of sensitive skin differ at different anatomical sites? An epidemiological study. Clin Exp Dermatol 38(8):e521–e530
Querleux B, Dauchot K, Jourdain R, Bastien P, Bittoun J, Anton J, Burnod Y, de Lacharrière O (2008) Neural basis of sensitive skin: an fMRI study. Skin Res Technol 14(4):454–461
Saint-Martory C, Roguedas-Contios AM, Sibaud V, Degouy A, Schmitt AM, Misery L (2008) Sensitive skin is not limited to the face. Br J Dermatol 158(1):130–133
Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, Verrière F, Nocera T, Taieb C (2005) Sensitive skin in France: an epidemiological approach. Ann Dermatol Venereol 132(5):425–429
Guinot C, Malvy D, Mauger E, Ezzedine K, Latreille J, Ambroisine L, Tenenhaus M, Préziosi P, Morizot F, Galan P et al (2006) Self-reported skin sensitivity in a general adult population in France: data of the SU.VI.MAX cohort. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 20(4):380–390
Farage MA, Bowtell P, Katsarou A (2008) Self-diagnosed sensitive skin in women with clinically diagnosed atopic dermatitis. Cli Med Dermatol 2:21–28
Farage MA (2010) Does sensitive skin differ between men and women? Cutan Ocul Toxicol 29(3):153–163
Farage MA (2008) Perceptions of sensitive skin: changes in perceived severity and associations with environmental causes. Contact Dermatitis 59(4):226–232
Farage MA, Maibach HI (2008) Sensitive skin syn-drome: methodological approaches. Cosmet Toil 123(9):28–33
Berardesca E, Cespa M, Farinelli N, Rabbiosi G, Maibach H (1991) In vivo transcutaneous penetration of nicotinates and sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 25(1):35–38
Robinson MK, Perkins MA (2001) Evaluation of a quantitative clinical method for assessment of sensory skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 45(4):205–213
Farage MA (2005) Assessing the skin irritation potential of facial tissues. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 24(2):125–135
Lee CH, Maibach HI (1995) The sodium lauryl sulfate model: an overview. Contact Dermatitis 33(1):1–7
Basketter DA, York M, McFadden JP, Robinson MK (2004) Determination of skin irritation potential in the human 4-h patch test. Contact Dermatitis 51(1):1–4
Robinson MK (2002) Population differences in acute skin irritation responses. Race, sex, age, sensitive skin and repeat subject comparisons. Contact Dermatitis 46(2):86–93
Farage MA, Maibach HI (2008) Sensitive skin syndrome: relationships among factors. Cosmet Toil 123(11):28–31
Farage M, Maibach HI (2004) The vulvar epithelium differs from the skin: implications for cutaneous testing to address topical vulvar exposures. Contact Dermatitis 51(4):201–209
Basketter DA, Wilhelm KP (1996) Studies on non-immune immediate contact reactions in an unselected population. Contact Dermatitis 35(4):237–240
Robinson MK (2001) Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses. Contact Dermatitis 45(2):75–83
Cua AB, Wilhelm KP, Maibach HI (1990) Cutaneous sodium lauryl sulphate irritation potential: age and regional variability. Br J Dermatol 123(5):607–613
Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Löffler H (2002) Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol 146(6):1052–1056
Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 18(2):65–70
Kalogeromitros D, Katsarou A, Armenaka M, Rigopoulos D, Zapanti M, Stratigos I (1995) Influence of the menstrual cycle on skin-prick test reactions to histamine, morphine and allergen. Clin Exp Allergy 25(5):461–466
Farage MA, Osborn TW, Maclean AB (2008) Cognitive, sensory, and emotional changes associated with the menstrual cycle: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278(4):299–307
Britz MB, Maibach HI, Anjo DM (1980) Human percutaneous penetration of hydrocortisone: the vulva. Arch Dermatol Res 267(3):313–316
Thomson ML (1955) Relative efficiency of pigment and horny layer thickness in protecting the skin of Europeans and Africans against solar ultraviolet radiation. J Physiol 127(2):236–246
Johnson LC, Corah NL (1963) Racial differences in skin resistance. Science 139(3556):766–767
Corcuff P, Lotte C, Rougier A, Maibach HI (1991) Racial differences in corneocytes. A comparison between black, white and oriental skin. Acta Derm Venereol 71(2):146–148
Marriott M, Whittle E, Basketter DA (2003) Facial variations in sensory responses. Contact Dermatitis 49(5):227–231
Lampe MA, Burlingame AL, Whitney J, Williams ML, Brown BE, Roitman E, Elias PM (1983) Human stratum corneum lipids: characterization and regional variations. J Lipid Res 24(2):120–130
Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L (1998) Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 38(6):311–315
Loffler H (2006) Contact allergy and sensitive skin. In: Berardesca E, Fluhr J, Maibach H (eds) Sensitive skin syndrome. Taylor and Francis, New York
Löffler H, Dickel H, Kuss O, Diepgen TL, Effendy I (2001) Characteristics of self-estimated enhanced skin susceptibility. Acta Derm Venereol 81(5):343–346
Effendy I, Loeffler H, Maibach HI (1995) Baseline transepidermal water loss in patients with acute and healed irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 33(6):371–374
Lonne-Rahm S, Berg M, Mårin P, Nordlind K (2004) Atopic dermatitis, stinging, and effects of chronic stress: a pathocausal study. J Am Acad Dermatol 51(6):899–905
Farage MA (2010) Perceptions of sensitive skin with age. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI (eds) Textbook of aging skin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, Consoli S, Nocera T, Taieb C (2006) Sensitive skin: epidemiological approach and impact on quality of life in France. In: Berardesca E, Fluhr JW, Maibach HI (eds) Sensitive skin syndrome. Taylor & Francis, New York
Misery L, Boussetta S, Nocera T, Perez-Cullell N, Taieb C (2009) Sensitive skin in Europe. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 23(4):376–381
Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, Teri M (2009) Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 55(3):144–149
Wines N, Willsteed E (2001) Menopause and the skin. Australas J Dermatol 42(3):149–8; quiz 159
Leong PL (2008) Aging changes in the male face. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 16(3):277–279, v
Mowlavi A, Cooney D, Febus L, Khosraviani A, Wilhelmi BJ, Akers G (2005) Increased cutaneous nerve fibers in female specimens. Plast Reconstr Surg 116(5):1407–1410
Reed JT, Ghadially R, Elias PM (1995) Skin type, but neither race nor gender, influence epidermal permeability barrier function. Arch Dermatol 131(10): 1134–1138
Farage MA, Neill S, MacLean AB (2009) Physiological changes associated with the menstrual cycle: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64(1):58–72
Farage MA, Berardesca E, Maibach H (2010) The possible relevance of sex hormones on irritant and allergic responses: their importance for skin testing. Contact Dermatitis 62(2):67–74
Agner T, Damm P, Skouby SO (1991) Menstrual cycle and skin reactivity. J Am Acad Dermatol 24(4):566–570
Agner T (1992) Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh) 173:1–26
Rohold AE, Halkier-Sørensen L, Andersen KE, Thestrup-Pedersen K (1994) Nickel patch test reactivity and the menstrual cycle. Acta Derm Venereol 74(5):383–385
Farage MA, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (2009) The effect of sex hormones on irritant and allergic response: possible relevance for skin testing. Br J Dermatol 160(2):450–451
Robinson MK (2006) Age and gender as influencing factors in skin sensitivity. In: Berardesca E, Fluhr J, Maibach H (eds) Sensitive skin syndrome. Taylor & Francis, New York
Weigand DA, Haygood C, Gaylor JR (1974) Cell layers and density of Negro and Caucasian stratum corneum. J Invest Dermatol 62(6):563–568
Reinertson RP, Wheatley VR (1959) Studies on the chemical composition of human epidermal lipids. J Invest Dermatol 32(1):49–59
Kaidbey KH, Agin PP, Sayre RM, Kligman AM (1979) Photoprotection by melanin – a comparison of black and Caucasian skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1(3):249–260
Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupont C (1993) In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with two noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol 6(3):200–207
Wilson D, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1988) In vitro transepidermal water loss: differences between black and white human skin. Br J Dermatol 119(5):647–652
Sugino K, Imokawa G, Maibach H (1993) Ethnic difference of stratum corneum lipid in relation to stratum corneum function. J Invest Dermatol 100:587 [Abstract 594]
Anderson RR, Parrish JA (1981) The optics of human skin. J Invest Dermatol 77(1):13–19
Hymes J, Spraker M (1986) Racial differences in the effectiveness of a topically applied mixture of local anesthetics. Reg Anesth 11:11–13
Wedig JH, Maibach HI (1981) Percutaneous penetration of dipyrithione in man: effect of skin color (race). J Am Acad Dermatol 5(4):433–438
Guy RH, Tur E, Bjerke S, Maibach HI (1985) Are there age and racial differences to methyl nicotinate-induced vasodilatation in human skin? J Am Acad Dermatol 12(6):1001–1006
Berardesca E, Maibach HI (1990) Racial differences in pharmacodynamic response to nicotinates in vivo in human skin: black and white. Acta Derm Venereol 70(1):63–66
Marshall E, Lynch V, Smith H (1919) Variation in susceptibility of the skin to dichlorethylsulfide. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 12:291–301
Weigand D, Mershon M (1970) The cutaneous irritant reaction to agent O-chlorobenzylidene malonitrile (CS); quantitation and racial influence in human subjects. Edgewood Arsenal 4332
Weigand DA, Gaylor JR (1974) Irritant reaction in Negro and Caucasian skin. South Med J 67(5):548–551
Frosch P, Kligman A (1981) A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 28:197–209
Freeman R, Cockerell E, Armstrong J et al (1962) Sunlight as a factor influencing the thickness of epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 39:295–298
Berardesca E, Maibach H (1996) Racial differences in skin pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol 34(4):667–672
Bronaugh RL, Stewart RF, Simon M (1986) Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. VII: use of excised human skin. J Pharm Sci 75(11):1094–1097
Sandby-Møller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC (2003) Epidermal thickness at different body sites: relationship to age, gender, pigmentation, blood content, skin type and smoking habits. Acta Derm Venereol 83(6):410–413
Robinson MK (1999) Population differences in skin structure and physiology and the susceptibility to irritant and allergic contact dermatitis: implications for skin safety testing and risk assessment. Contact Dermatitis 41(2):65–79
Rapaport MJ (1984) Patch testing in Japanese subjects. Contact Dermatitis 11(2):93–97
Robinson MK (2000) Racial differences in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses between Caucasian and Asian populations. Contact Dermatitis 42(3):134–143
Farage MA, Miller KW, Elsner P, Maibach HI (2008) Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in skin ageing: a review. Int J Cosmet Sci 30(2):87–95
Sparavigna A, Di Pietro A, Setaro M (2005) ‘Healthy skin’: significance and results of an Italian study on healthy population with particular regard to ‘sensitive’ skin. Int J Cosmet Sci 27(6):327–331
Besné I, Descombes C, Breton L (2002) Effect of age and anatomical site on density of sensory innervation in human epidermis. Arch Dermatol 138(11):1445–1450
Misery L, Sibaud V, Ambronati M, Macy G, Boussetta S, Taieb C (2008) Sensitive scalp: does this condition exist? An epidemiological study. Contact Dermatitis 58(4):234–238
Tagami H (2002) Racial differences on skin barrier function. Cutis 70(6 Suppl):6–7; discussion 21–23
Green B (1996) Regional and individual differences in cutaneous sensitivity to chemical irritants: capsaicin and menthol. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 15:277–295
Farage M, Bowtell P, Katsarou A (2006) The relationship among objectively assessed vulvar erythema, skin sensitivity, genital sensitivity, and self-reported facial skin redness. J Appl Res 6:272–281
Farage MA (2009) Perceptions of sensitive skin: women with urinary incontinence. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280:49–57, Epub 2008 Dec 14
Farage MA (2008) Self-reported immunological and familial links in individuals who perceive they have sensitive skin. Br J Dermatol 159(1):237–238
Farage MA, Bowtell P, Katsarou A (2010) Identifying patients likely to have atopic dermatitis: development of a pilot algorithm. Am J Clin Dermatol 11(3):211–215
Farage MA, Miller KW, Berardesca E, Maibach HI (2008) Psychosocial and societal burden of incontinence in the aged population: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277(4):285–290
Farage MA, Miller KW, Ledger WJ (2008) Determining the cause of vulvovaginal symptoms. Obstet Gynecol Surv 63(7):445–464
Farage MA, Katsarou A, Tsagroni E, Bowtell P, Meyer S, Deliveliotou A, Creatsas G (2005) Cutaneous and sensory effects of two sanitary pads with distinct surface materials: a randomized prospective trial. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 24:227–241
Farage MA, Stadler A, Chassard D, Pelisse M (2008) A randomized prospective trial of the cutaneous and sensory effects of feminine hygiene wet wipes. J Reprod Med 53(10):765–773
Farage MA, Stadler A (2005) Cumulative irritation patch test of sanitary pads on sensitive skin. J Cosmet Dermatol 4(3):179–183
Farage MA, Santana M, Henley E (2005) Correlating sensory effects with irritation. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 24(1):45–52
Farage MA (2009) Detecting skin irritation using enhanced visual scoring: a sensitive new clinical method. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI (eds) Handbook of cosmetic science and technology, 3rd edn. Informa Healthcare, New York
Farage MA (2009) Sensory effects and irritation: a strong relationship. In: Barel A, Paye M, Maibach H (eds) Handbook of cosmetic science and technology. Informa Healthcare USA, Inc, New York
Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, Consoli S, Boussetta S, Nocera T, Taieb C (2007) Sensitive skin: psychological effects and seasonal changes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 21(5):620–628
Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Maes DH (1998) Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermat 9(3):170–175
Perkins MA, Osterhues MA, Farage MA, Robinson MK (2001) A noninvasive method to assess skin irritation and compromised skin conditions using simple tape adsorption of molecular markers of inflammation. Skin Res Technol 7(4):227–237
Perkins MA, Osterhues MA, Vogelpohl S, Robinson MK (2000) A clinical skin sampling approach to assess sensory skin irritation. Toxicological Sciences 54:146
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Farage, M.A., Robinson, M.K. (2012). Sensitive Skin: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Contributors. In: Lodén, M., Maibach, H. (eds) Treatment of Dry Skin Syndrome. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27606-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27606-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27605-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27606-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)