Strategies and Actions to Improve Risk Communication Competency in Radiation Medicine

Chapter

Abstract

Improvements in practitioner competency in radiation risk communication support quality and patient-centered care and enhance patient understanding by providing evidence-based information on radiation risks. Strategies, actions, and approaches are discussed to improve teaching, learning, implementation, and evaluation. The key to successful teaching is to provide contents and employ methodologies appropriate to the recipients. Actions that would encourage the learning and application of these skills are complementary. Supporting strategies include the advocacy and promotion of education, the research into radiation effects and adult education, the strengthening of education infrastructures, and the implementation of relevant policies. These efforts will be enhanced by an inclusive approach with leadership, collaboration, and participation.

Keywords

International Atomic Energy Agency Radiation Protection Risk Communication Continue Professional Development Radiation Safety 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. American College of Radiology (2011) Radiology safety resources. Retrieved from http://www.acr.org/safety. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  2. American College of Radiology and Radiological Society of North America (2011) RadiologyInfo. Retrieved from http://www.radiologyinfo.org/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  3. Balter S (2011) Radiation need not be feared, but it must be respected. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:754–755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balter S, Zanzonico P, Reiss GR, Moses JW (2011) Radiation is not the only risk. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:762–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardinal JS, Gunderman RB, Tarver RD (2011) Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article. J Am Coll Radiol 8:402–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crump M, Hodgson D (2009) J Clin Oncol 27:4229–4231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL, Balter R, Williamson MJ, St. Germain J (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fahey FH, Treves ST, Adelstein SJ (2011) Minimizing and communicating radiation risk in pediatric nuclear medicine. J Nucl Med 52(8):1240–1251, Epub 2011 Jul 15PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Georgen S (2010) They don’t know what they don’t know. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Image Wisely (2011) Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.imagewisely.org. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  11. International Atomic Energy Agency (2011) Radiation protection of patients. Retrieved from http://rpop.iaea.org/RPOP/RPoP/Content/index.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  12. Ionizing Radiation Exposure of the Population of the United States (2009) In: NCRP report No. 160. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorgensen TJ, Moscovitch M (2011) Communicating radiation risks to the public. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 145:339–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lau LSW (2006) A continuum of quality improvement in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 3:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lau LSW (2007) The Australian national quality program in diagnostic imaging and interventional radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 4:849–855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Medical Professionalism Project (2002) Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a ­physician’s charter. Lancet 359:520–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Health Performance Committee (NHPC) (2001) National health performance framework report. Queensland Health, Brisbane, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  18. Ng KH, Cameron JR (2001) Using the BERT concept to promote public understanding of radiation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on the radiological protection in diagnostic and interventional radiology, Málaga, 26–30 March 2001. IAEA C&S Papers Series 7/P, pp 784–787Google Scholar
  19. Peiffert D, Simon JM, Eschwege F (2007) Epinal radiotherapy accident: passed, present, future. Cancer Radiother 11:309–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Perez MR, Lau LSW (2010) WHO workshop on radiation risk assessment in paediatric health care. J Radiol Prot 30:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quality Use of Diagnostic Imaging Program (2011) Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.qudi.net.au/qudi/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  22. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (2010) The CanMEDS physician competency framework. Retrieved from http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/about_e.php. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  23. Smith-Bindman R (2010) Is computed tomography safe? N Engl J Med 363:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soye JA, Paterson A (2008) A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland. Br J Radiol 81:725–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. The Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging (2011) Homepage. Retrieved from http://www.pedrad.org/associations/5364/ig/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  26. The International Society of Radiology (2011a) GO RAD program. Retrieved from http://www.isradiology.org/gorad/revistas.php. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  27. The International Society of Radiology (2011b) Virtual Congress program. Retrieved from http://www.isrvirtual.org/lms/. Accessed 2 Aug 2011
  28. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (2011) InsideRadiology. Retrieved from http://www.insideradiology.com.au/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  29. The Royal College of Radiologists (2011) Virtual departments. Retrieved from http://www.goingfora.com/index.html. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  30. The United Nations Education, Science and Cultural Organization (2011) Avicenna virtual campus. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/sti-policy/avicenna-virtual-campus/. Accessed 3 Aug 2011
  31. World Health Organization (2008a) The World Health report 2008: primary health care, now more than ever. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization (2008b) WHO global initiative on radiation safety in health care ­settings. Technical Meeting Report. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou GZ, Wong DD, Nguyen LK, Mendelson RM (2010) Student and intern awareness of ionizing radiation exposure from common diagnostic imaging procedures. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 54:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence S. Lau
    • 1
  • Kwan-Hoong Ng
    • 2
  • Rethy K. Chhem
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.International Radiology Quality NetworkSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical ImagingUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Atomic Bomb Disease InstituteNagasaki UniversityNagasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations