Role of Plant: Microbe Interactions in the Sustainable Development of Muga Sericulture

  • Bala Gopalan Unni
  • Basabrani Devi
  • Yelena Kakoty
  • Sawlang Borsingh Wann
  • Archana Borah
  • Pallavi Dowarah
Chapter

Abstract

In recent decades, increased agricultural production leads to intensive use of agrochemicals. This has affected the ecosystem stability. Biological control is one such alternative which supplements the use of chemical fertilizer, prevents the plant diseases, and promotes the health of the plants. In Muga sericulture, a Som plant (Machilus bombycina) is used as primary host plants of Muga silkworm (Antheraea assama, Helfer). A study has been made to improve the quality and quantity production of silk fiber using bacteria as a biocontrol agent and production of antibacterial peptides using Muga silkworm as a model insect for the control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a causative agent of flacherie disease in Muga silkworm. This study could be exploited in improvement of silk production and biocontrol of flacherie disease.

Keywords

Antibacterial Activity Antibacterial Peptide Micrococcus Luteus Antibacterial Protein Insect Defensin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Dr. P. G. Rao, Director, North-East Institute of Science & Technology (CSIR), Jorhat, Assam (India), for the support and encouragements and the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India for the support.

References

  1. Abraham EG, Nagaraju J, Salunke D, Gupta HM, Dutta RK (1995) Purification and partial characterization of an induced antibacterial protein in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Invertebr Pathol 65:17–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu Hakima R, Faye I (1981) An ultrastructural and autoradiographic study of the immune response in Hyalophora cecropia pupae. Cell Tissue Res 217:311–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adesemoye AO, Obini M, Ugoji EO (2008) Comparison of plant growth-promotion with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis in three vegetables. Braz J Microbiol 39:423–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amir HG, Shamsuddin ZH, Halimi M, Marziah M, Ramlan MF (2005) Enhancement in nutrient accumulation and growth of oil palm seedlings caused by PGPR under field nursery conditions. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 36:2059–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson R, Cook ML (1979) Induction of Lysozyme like activity in the hemolymph and hemocytes of an insect Spodoptera eridania. J Invertebr Pathol 33(2):197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ando K, Okada M, Natori S (1987) Purification of Sarcotoxin II, antibacterial proteins of Sarcophaga peregrina (Flesh fly) larvae. Biochemistry 26(1):226–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Andra J, Berninghausen O, Leippe M (2001) Cecropins, antibacterial peptides from insects and mammals are potently fungicidal against Candida albicans. Med Microbiol Immunol 189:169–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barra D, Simmaco M, Boman H (1998) Gene- encoded peptide antibiotics and innate immunity. FEBS Lett 430:130–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bechinger B (1999) The structure, dynamics and orientation of antimicrobial peptides in membranes by multidimensional solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Biochim Biophys Acta 1462:157–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boman H (1998) Gene-encoded peptide antibiotics and the concept of innate immunity: an update review. Scand J Immunol 48:15–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boman HG, Steiner H (1981) Humoral immunity in Cecropia pupae. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 94:75–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boman HG, Faye I, Gudmundsson GH, Lee JY, Lidholm DA (1991) Cell free immunity in Cecropia. A model system for antibacterial proteins. Eur J Biochem 201:23–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boman HG, Agerberth B, Boman A (1993) Mechanisms of action on Escherichia coli of cecropin P1 and PR-39, two antibacterial peptides from pig intestine. Infect Immun 61(7):2978–2984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1999) The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Adv Agron 66:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bowmen HG, Hultmark D (1987) Cell free immunity in insects. Annu Rev Microbiol 41:103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brooks WM (1971) The inflammatory response of the tobacco hornworm, manduca Sexta to infection by the microsporidium, Nosema sphingidis. J Invertebr Pathol 17(1):87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bulet P, Hetru C, Dimarcq JL, Hoffmann D (1999) Antimicrobial peptides in insects; structure and function. Dev Comp Immunol 23(4–5):329–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bullied WJ, Buss TJ, Vessey JK (2002) Bacillus cereus UW85 inoculation effects on growth, nodulation and N accumulation in grain legumes: Field studies. Can J Plant Sci 82:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Carlsson A, Engstrom P, Palva ET, Bennich H (1991) Attacin, an antibacterial protein from Hyalophora cecropia, inhibits synthesis of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli by interfering with omp gene transcription. Infect Immun 59(9):3040–3045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chadwick JS (1970) Relation of lysozyme concentration to acquired immunity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Galleria mallonella. J Invertebr Pathol 15(3):455–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chong HK, Joon HL, Iksoo K, Sook JS, Seok MS, Ki YL, In HL (2004) Purification and cDNA cloning of a cecropin like peptide from the great wax moth, Galleria mellonella. Mol Cells 17(2):262–266Google Scholar
  22. Choudhury A, Guha A, Yadav A, Kumari J, Unni BG, Roy MK (2004) Induced immunity in Antheraea assama Ww larvae against flacherie causing Pseudomonas aeruginosa AC-3. Exp Parasitol 106:75–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chung KT, Ourth DD (2000) Virecin, A novel antibacterial protein from immune hemolymph of Heliothis virescens pupae. Eur J Biochem 267(3):677–683PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cociancich S, Ghazi A, Hetru C, Hoffman JA, Letellier L (1993) Insect defensin, an inducible antibacterial peptide, forms voltage-dependent channels in Micrococcus luteus. J Biol Chem 268(26):19239–19245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Cociancich S, Bulet P, Hetru C, Hoffmann JA (1994) The inducible antibacterial peptides of insects. Parasitol Today 10(4):132–139PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Compant S, Reiter B, Sessitsch A, Nowak J, Clement C, Ait Barka E (2005) Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by a plant growthpromoting bacterium, Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:1685–1693Google Scholar
  27. De Freitas JR, Germida JJ (1990) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for winter wheat. Can J Microbiol 36(4):265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Silva A, Patterson K, Rothrock C, Moore J (2000) Growth promotion of highbush blueberry by fungal and bacterial inoculants. Hort Sci 35:1228–1230Google Scholar
  29. De Verno PJ, Chaodwick JS, Aston WP, Dunphy GB (1984) The in vitro generation of an antibacterial activity from the fat body and haemolymph of non-immunized larvae of Galleria mellonella. Dev Comp Immunol 8(3):537–546PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dimarcq JL, Hoffmann D, Meister M, Bulet P, Lanot R, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA (1994) Characterization and transcriptional profile of a Drosophila gene encoding an insect defensin- A study in insect immunity. Eur J Biochem 221:201–209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dularay B, Lackie AM (1985) Haemocytic encapsulation and the prophenoloxidase-activation pathway in the locust Schistocerca gregaria forsk. Insect Biochem 15(6):827–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ekengren S, Hultmark D (1999) Drosophila cecropin as an antifungal agent. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 29(11):965–972PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Engstrom A, Engstrom P, Tao ZJ, Carlsson A, Bennich H (1984a) Insect immunity. The primary structure of the antibacterial protein attacin F and its relation to two native attacins from Hyalophora cecropia. EMBO J 3(9):2065–2070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Engstrom P, Carlsson A, Engstrom A, Tao ZJ, Bennich H (1984b) The antibacterial effect of attacins from the silk moth Hyalophora cecropia is directed against the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. EMBO J 3(13):3347–3351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Faye I, Wyatt GR (1980) The synthesis of antibacterial proteins in isolated fat body from cecropia silk moth pupae. Experientia 36:1325–1326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gazit E, Lee WJ, Brey PT, Shai Y (1994) Mode of action of the antibacterial cecropin B2: A spectrofluorometric study. Biochemistry 33(35):10681–10692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hara S, Yamakawa M (1995) Moricin, a novel type of antibacterial peptide isolated from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. J Biol Chem 270(50):29923–29927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoffmann J, Hetru Ch (1992) Insect defensins: inducible antibacterial peptides. Immunol Today 13:411–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoffmann D, Hultmark D, Boman HG (1981) Insect immunity: Galleria mellonella and other lepidoptera have cecropin P9 like actors active against gram-negative bacteria. Insect Biochem 11(5):537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hultmark D, Steiner H, Rasmuson T, Boman HG (1980) Insect immunity. Purification and properties of three inducible bactericidal proteins from hemolymph of immunized pupae of Hyalophora cecropia. Eur J Biochem 106:7–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hultmark D, Engstrom A, Andersson K, Steiner H, Bennich H, Boman HG (1983) Insect immunity. Attacins, a family of antibacterial proteins from Hyalophora cecropia. EMBO J 2(4):571–576PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Hurlbert RE, Karlinsey JE, Spence KD (1985) Differential synthesis of bacteria induced proteins of Manduca sexta larvae and pupae. J Insect Physiol 31:205–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jenni B, Isch C, Aragno M (1989) Nitrogen fixation by new strains of Pseudomonas pseudoflava and related bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 135:461–467Google Scholar
  44. Jyotsana S, Yadav A, Unni BG, Kalita MC (2005) Antibacterial proteins from non-mulberry silkworms against flacherie causing Pseudomonas aeruginosa AC-3. Curr Sci 89(9):1613–1618Google Scholar
  45. Kaaya GP, Flyg C, Boman HG (1987) Insect Immunity: Induction of cecropin and attacin like antibacterial factors in the haemolymph of Glossina morsitans. Insect Biochem 17(2):309–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kanost MR (1983) The induction of lysozyme and other anti bacterial haemolymph proteins in Tobacco hornworm, Manduca Sexta. Ph.D. Thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 1–154Google Scholar
  47. Kim SH, Park BS, Yun EY, Je YH, Woo SD, Kang SW, Kim KY, Kang SK (1998) Cloning and Expression of a Novel Gene Encoding a New Antibacterial Peptide from Silkworm, Bombyx mori. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 246(2):388–392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kirill AM, Vladimir AS, Olegv K, Anatoly TG, Alexander SS (2001) Cell free production of biologically active polypeptides: application to the synthesis of anti bacterial peptide Cecropin. Protein expression and Purification 21:456–461Google Scholar
  49. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. Pages 879–882 In: Proceeings of the 4th International Conference on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, vol 2, Station de Pathologie Vegetale et Phytobacteriologie, INRA, Angers, FranceGoogle Scholar
  50. Kloepper JW, Leong J, Teintze M, Schroth MN (1980) Enhance plant growth by siderophores produced by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Nature 286:885–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kockum K, Faye I, Hofsten PV, Lee JY, Xanthopoulos KG, Boman HG (1984) Insect immunity. Isolation and sequence of two cDNA clones corresponding to acidic and basic attacins from Hyalophora cecropia. EMBO J 3(9):2071–2075PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Komano H, Mizuno D, Natori S (1980) Purification of lectin induced in the haemolymph of Sarcophaga peregrina larvae on injury. J Biol Chem 255(7):2919–2924PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Lamberty M, Ades S, Joseph SU, Brookhart G, Bushey D, Hoffmann JA, Butlet P (1999) Insect Immunity: isolation from the Lepidopteran Heliothis virescens of a novel insect defensin with potent antifungal activity. J Biol Chem 274(14):9320–9326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lamberty M, Caille A, Landon C, Tassin-Moindrot S, Hetru C, Bulet P, Vovelle F (2001a) Solution structures of the antifungal heliomicin and a selected variant with both antibacterial and antifungal activities. Biochemistry 40:11995–12003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lamberty M, Zachary D, Lanot R, Bordereau C, Robert A, Hoffmann JA, Bulet P (2001b) Insect immunity. Constitutive expression of a cysteine-rich antifungal and a linear antibacterial peptide in a termite insect. J Biol Chem 276:4085–4092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lee JY, Edlund T, Ny T, Faye I, Boman HG (1983) Microbiology, 2nd edn. WMC Brown Publishers, Oxford, pp 96–548Google Scholar
  57. Lucy M, Reed E, Glick BR (2004) Application of free living plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 86:1–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lugtenberg BJ, Chin-A-Woeng TF, Bloemberg GV (2002) Microbe-plant interactions: principles and mechanisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:373–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mak P, Chmiel D, Gacek GJ (2001) Antibacterial peptides of the moth Galleria mellonella. Acta Biochem Pol 48(4):1191–1195Google Scholar
  60. Matsuura K, Tamura T, Kobayashi N, Yashiro T, Tatsumi S (2007) The antibacterial protein lysozyme identified as the termite egg recognition pheromone. PLoS One 2(8):813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mia MAB, Shamsuddin ZH, Wahab Z, Marziah M (2005) High-yielding and quality banana production through plant growth-promoting rhizobacterial inoculation. Fruits 60:179–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mohring W, Messner B (1968) Immunreaktionen bei insekten I Lysozymals grundlegender antibakterieller factor im humoralen abwehrmechanismus der Insekten. Biol Zentralbl 87:439–470Google Scholar
  63. Morishima I, Suginaka S, Bougaki T, Inoue M, Ueno T (1988) Induction and partial characterization of antibacterial proteins in the hemolymph of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Agric Biol Chem 52(4):929–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morishima I, Suginaka S, Ueno T, Hirano H (1990) Isolation and structure of cecropins, inducible antibacterial peptides from the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Comp Biochem Physiol B 3:551–554Google Scholar
  65. Okada M, Natori S (1983) Purification and characterization of an antibacterial protein from haemolymph of Sarcophaga peregrina (Flesh fly) larvae. Biochem J 211:727–734PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Otvos L Jr (2000) Antibacterial peptides isolated from insects. J Pept Sci 6:497–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pant R, Unni BG (1980) Free amino acids of haemolymph and silk gland in the developing fifth instar and spinning larva of Philosamia ricini. Curr Sci 49:538–541Google Scholar
  68. Park Y, Lee DG, Jang SH, Woo ER, Jeong HG, Choi CH, Hahm KS (2003) A Leu-Lys-rich anti microbial peptide: activity and mechanism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1645(2):172–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Pye AE, Boman HG (1977) Insect immunity. III. Purification and partial characterization of immune protein P5 from haemolymph of Hyalophora cecropia pupae. Infect Immunol 17(2):408–414Google Scholar
  70. Qi G, Zhou Q, Qu X, Huang Z (1984) Some inducible antibacterial substances developed from the haemolymph of Oak silkworm, Antheraea pernyi by ultrasonic treatment. Kexue Tongbao 29:670–674Google Scholar
  71. Qu X, Steiner H, Engstrom A, Bennich H, Boman HG (1982) Insect immunity: Isolation and structure of cecropins B and D from pupae of the Chinese Oak Silk moth, Antheraea pernyi. Eur J Biochem 127:219–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Quadt-Hallmann A, Hallmann J, Kloepper JW (1997) Bacterial endophytes in cotton: location and interaction with other plant associated bacteria. Can J Microbiol 43:254–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ratcliffe NA, Rowley AF, Fitzgerald SW, Rhodes CP (1985) Invertebrate immunity: basic concepts and recent advances. Int Rev Cytol 97:183–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Reichhart JM, Essrich M, Dimarcq JL, Hoffmann D, Hoffmann JA, Lagueux M (1989) Insect immunity. Isolation of cDNA clones corresponding to diptericin, an inducible antibacterial peptide from Phormia terranovae (Diptera). Transcriptional profiles during immunization. Eur J Biochem 182(2):423–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rizki TM, Rizki RM (1984) The cellular defense system of Drosophila melanogaster. In: King RC, Akai R (eds) Insect ultrastructure, vol 2. Plenum, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Salt G (1970) The cellular defense reactions of insects. Monogr Exp Biol 46:10–118 Cambridge University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  77. Sarmasik A, Chen TT (2003) Bactericidal activity of cecropin B and cecropin P1 expressed in fish cells (CHSE-214): application in controlling fish bacterial pathogen. Aquaculture 220:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Saubidet MI, Fatta N, Barneix AJ (2002) The effect of inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on growth and nitrogen utilization by wheat plants. Plant Soil 245:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sharma A, Sharma R, Imamura M, Yamakawa M, Machii H (2000) Transgenic expression of cecropin B, an antibacterial peptide from Bombyx mori, confers enhanced resistance to bacterial leaf blight in rice. FEBS Lett 484(1):7–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Spies AG, Karlinsey JE, Spence KD (1986) Antibacterial haemolymph proteins of Manduca sexta. Comp Biochem Physiol B 83(1):125–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Stephens JM, Marshall JH (1962) Some Properties of an immune factor isolated from the blood of actively immunized wax moth larvae. Can J Microbiol 8(5):719–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sun D, Fallon AM (2002) Characterization of genomic DNA encoding cecropins from an Aedes albopictus mosquito cell line. Insect Mol Biol 11(1):21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sun SC, Lindstrom I, Lee JY, Faye I (1991) Structure and expression of the attacin genes in Hyalophora cecropia. Eur J Biochem 196(1):247–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Takahashi H, Komano H, Kawaguchi N, Kitamura N, Nakanishi S, Natori S (1985) Cloning and sequencing of cDNA of Sarcophaga peregrina humoral lectin induced on injury of the body wall. J Biol Chem 260:12228–12233PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Teshima T, Ueki Y, Nakai T, Shiba T (1986) Structure determination of Lepidopteran c, self defense substance produced by silkworm (Bombyx mori). Tetrahedron Lett 42(3):829–834Google Scholar
  86. Unni BG, Bora U, Singh HR, Kumar BSDileep, Devi B, Wann SB, Bora A, Bhau BS, Neog K, Chakravorty R (2008) High yield and quality silk fibre production by muga silkworm, Antheraea assama through application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Curr Sci 94(6):768–774Google Scholar
  87. Unni BG, Goswami M, Kakoty Y, Bhattacarjee M, Wann SB, Rajkhowa G, Das S, Devi BR, Chutia AD (2009) Indigenous knowledge of silkworm cultivation and its utilization in North Eastern region of India. Indian J Tradit Knowl 8(1):70–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bala Gopalan Unni
    • 1
  • Basabrani Devi
    • 1
  • Yelena Kakoty
    • 1
  • Sawlang Borsingh Wann
    • 1
  • Archana Borah
    • 1
  • Pallavi Dowarah
    • 1
  1. 1.Biotechnology DivisionNorth-East Institute of Science & Technology (CSIR)JorhatIndia

Personalised recommendations