Advertisement

BIPV Applications in the GCC Region: A Comparative Study on the Key Parameters

  • Ali Asghar
  • Mahieddine Emziane
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 12)

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the effect of environmental parameters such as temperature and irradiance, and system parameters such as the angle of inclination on the energy yield of PV systems for building integrated PV (BIPV) applications in cities in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region and other cities in the northern hemisphere. Several PV technologies are assessed to give an indication of which technologies would be suited for BIPV applications in which locations. It is seen that thin film solar cells would produce a better energy yield (kWh/kWp) in warm climates such as that of the GCC region while thin film and crystalline solar cells would perform equally well in colder climates further from the equator. Also, the energy yield for rooftop compared to façade BIPV installations would be much better for locations close to the equator while the energy yields for rooftop and façade BIPV applications would be almost the same for locations far from the equator.

Keywords

Solar Cell Energy Yield Thin Film Solar Cell Gulf Cooperation Council Maximum Power Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Radhi, H.: Evaluating the potential impact of global warming on the UAE residential buildings - A contribution to reduce the CO2 emissions. Building and Environment 44(12), 2451–2462 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    General Commission for the Protection of Marine Resources, Environment and Wildlife, in Bahrain’s Initial Communications to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Kingdom of Bahrain (2005) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Oliver, M., Jackson, T.: Energy and economic evaluation of building-integrated photovoltaics. Energy 26(4), 431–439 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Radhi, H.: Energy analysis of façade-integrated photovoltaic systems applied to UAE commercial buildings. Solar Energy 84(12), 2009–2021 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alnaser, N.W., Flanagan, R., Alnaser, W.E.: Potential of making–Over to sustainable buildings in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Energy and Buildings 40(7), 1304–1323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mermoud, A.: PVSYST version 5.31. User’s Manual (1996), http://www.pvsyst.com (January 10, 2011)
  7. 7.
    Hasimah, A.R., Khalid, M.N., Mohammad, Y.H.: Assessment of PV cell performance under actual Malaysia operating condition. In: Power Engineering Conference, AUPEC 2009. Australasian Universities (2009) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng, C., Sanchez Jimenez, C., Lee, M.: Research of BIPV optimal tilted angle, use of latitude concept for south orientated plans. Renewable Energy 34(6), 1644–1650 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaari, S., Bowman, N.: Photovoltaics in buildings: a case study for rural England and Malaysia. Renewable Energy 15(1-4), 558–561 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Asghar
    • 1
  • Mahieddine Emziane
    • 1
  1. 1.Solar Energy Materials and Devices LaboratoryMasdar Institute of Science and TechnologyMasdar City, Abu DhabiUAE

Personalised recommendations