Advertisement

From People Activity to Smart Buildings

  • Fernando Martínez Reyes
  • Chris Greenhalgh
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 12)

Abstract

The home of the future is expected to offer comfortable, safe, and supportive home spaces. Context-aware systems and artefacts may know the users’ routines and be anticipated to their needs. The users’ everyday activities, it is believed, will be supported and assisted by the different smart components of the home network. The home architecture should be ready to accept any scale of sensing technology in order to get a thorough understanding of the users’ behaviour and their relationship with the dwelling, before the vision of the smart home becomes a reality. In this paper we review some of the activity-aware home experiences, including our Context-Aware Room tool; and by using Rodden and Bendford work, we contrast the relationship of these experiences with the fabric of today’s home. Then, we explore some potential areas of improvement for our CARoom in an effort to get some insights for improving the CARoom smartness.

Keywords

Activity Recognition Ubiquitous Computing Smart Home Home Network Space Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Martínez, F., Greenhalgh, C.: Physicality of domestic aware designs. In: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Physicality, Lancaster, UK (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rode, J.A.: Appliances for whom? Considering place. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10(2-3), 90–94 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brand, S.: How Buildings Learn, New York, Viking (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidoff, S., Lee, M.K., Zimmerman, J., Dey, A.K.: Socially-aware requirements for a smart home for families. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 45–48 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodden, T., Benford, S.: The evolution of buildings and implications for the design of ubiquitous domestic environments. In: Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 9–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards, W.K., Grinter, R.E.: At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 256–272 (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Currie, J., Hotz, J.: Accidents will happen? Unintentional childhood injuries and the effects of child care regulations. Journal of Health Economics 23(1), 25–59 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macgregor, D.M.: Accident and emergency attendances by children under the age of 1 year as a result of injury (2003), http://www.emj.bjm.com (last accessed January 02, 2008)
  9. 9.
    Fogarty, J., Au, C., Hudson, S.E.: Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pp. 91–100. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel, S.N., Truong, K.N., Abowd, G.D.: PowerLine Positioning: A Practical Sub-Room-Level Indoor Location System for Domestic Use. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 441–458. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kasteren, T.V., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., Kröse, B.: Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2008), pp. 1–9. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orr, R., Abowd, G.: The smart floor: a mechanism for natural user identification and tracking. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, Netherlands, pp. 1–6 (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aipperspach, R., Rattenbury, T., Woodruff, A., Canny, J.: A Quantitative Method for Revealing and Comparing Places in the Home. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spataru, C., Gillot, M., Hall, M.: Domestic energy and occupancy - a novel post-occupancy evaluation study. International Journal of Low Carbon Technologies 5, 148–157 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Intille, S.S., Tapia, E.M., Rondoni, J., Beaudin, J.S., Kukla, C., Agarwal, S., Bao, L., Larson, K.: Tools for Studying Behavior and Technology in Natural Settings. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 157–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Philipose, M., Fishkin, K.P., Perkowitz, M., Patterson, D.J., Fox, D., Kautz, H., Hahnel, D.: Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(4) (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beaudin, J., Intille, S.S., Munguia, E.: Lessons learned using ubiquitous sensors for data collection in real homes. In: CHI 2004 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1359–1362. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Choudhury, T., Borriello, G., Consolvo, S., Haehnel, D., Harrison, B., Hemingway, B., Hightower, J., Klasnja, P., Koscher, K., LaMarca, A., Landay, J.A., LeGrand, L., Lester, J., Rahimi, A., Rea, A., Wyatt, D.: The mobile sensing platform: an embedded activity recognition system. IEEE Pervasive Computing 7(2), 32–41 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bao, L., Intille, S.S.: Activity recognition from user-annotated acceleration data. In: Proceedings of Pervasive 2004: the Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Junker, H., Amft, O., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G.: Gesture spotting with body-worn inertial sensors to detect user activities. Pattern Recogn 41, 2010–2024 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hinske, S., Langheinrich, M., Lampe, M.: Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS 2008), pp. 78–87. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Martínez Reyes
    • 1
  • Chris Greenhalgh
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EngineeringThe Autonomous University of ChihuahuaChihuahuaMexico
  2. 2.The University of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations