Skip to main content

Modeling and Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of Business Processes

Abstract

Many corporations and individuals realize that environmental sustainability is an urgent problem to address. In this chapter, we contribute to the emerging academic discussion by proposing two innovative approaches for engaging in the development of environmentally sustainable business processes. Specifically, we describe an extended process modeling approach for capturing and documenting the dioxide emissions produced during the execution of a business process. For illustration, we apply this approach to the case of a governmental Shared Services provider. Second, we then introduce an analysis method for measuring the carbon dioxide emissions produced during the execution of a business process. To illustrative this approach, we apply it in the real-life case of an European airport and show how this information can be leveraged in the re-design of “green” business processes.

Keywords

  • Business Process
  • Emission Factor
  • Carbon Footprint
  • Business Process Modeling Notation
  • Taxi Company

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_6
  • Chapter length: 17 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-27488-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Bromwich, M., & Hong, C. (1999). Activity-based costing systems and incremental costs. Management Accounting Research, 10(1), 39–60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (1991). Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 130–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. B. (1982). Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems Journal, 21(1), 4–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gulla, J. A., & Brasethvik, T. (2000, June 9–23). On the challenges of business modeling in large-scale reengineering projects. Paper presented at the 4th international conference on requirements engineering, Schaumburg, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs, R., & Suh, S. (2006). Reformulation of matrix-based LCI: From product balance to process balance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(1), 47–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., & Lave, L. (1998). Economic input–output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology, 32(7), 184–191.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J., & Falconer, M. (1995). A survey of activity-based costing in the U.K.’s largest companies. Management Accounting Research, 6(2), 137–153.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Bruns, W. J. (1987). Accounting and management: A field study perspective. Boston: Harvard Business Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauesen, S., & Vinter, O. (2001). Preventing requirement defects: An experiment in process improvement. Requirements Engineering, 6(1), 37–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mendling, J. (2008). Metrics for process models: Empirical foundations of verification, error prediction and guidelines for correctness (Vol. 6). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendling, J., Reijers, H. A., & Recker, J. (2010). Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Information Systems, 35(4), 467–482.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nuseibeh, B., & Easterbrook, S. (2000). Requirements engineering: A roadmap. Paper presented at the 22nd international conference on software engineering, Limerick, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, X., & Kraines, S. (2001). Environmental input–output models for life-cycle analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 20(1), 61–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Poniatowski, M. (2009). Foundation of Green IT: Consolidation, virtualization, efficiency, and ROI in the data center. Boston: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, M. R., & Gupt, P. P. (1992, December). Activity-based costing. Internal Auditor 91, 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., & Green, P. (2009). Business process modeling: A comparative analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10(4), 333–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reijers, H. A., & Mansar, S. L. (2005). Best practices in business process redesign: An overview and qualitative evaluation of successful redesign heuristics. Omega, 33(4), 283–306.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, S., Recker, J., Pimmer, C., & vom Brocke, J. (2010). Enablers and barriers to the organizational adoption of sustainable business practices. Paper presented at the 16th Americas conference on information systems, Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. S., & Fava, J. A. (2006). Life-cycle assessment practitioner survey: Summary of results. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(4), 12–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tornberg, K., Jämsen, M., & Paranko, J. (2002). Activity-based costing and process modeling for cost-conscious product design: A case study in a manufacturing company. International Journal of Production Economics, 19(1), 75–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook on business process management 1: Introduction, methods, and information systems. Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Recker .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Hjalmarsson, A., Lind, M. (2012). Modeling and Analyzing the Carbon Footprint of Business Processes. In: vom Brocke, J., Seidel, S., Recker, J. (eds) Green Business Process Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27488-6_6

Download citation