Advertisement

The ARUM Experimentation Platform: An Open Tool to Evaluate Mobile Systems Applications

  • Marc-Olivier Killijian
  • Matthieu Roy
  • Gaetan Severac

Abstract

This paper present the ARUM robotic platform. Inspired by the needs of realism in mobile networks simulation, this platform is composed of small mobiles robots using real, but attenuated, Wi-Fi communication interfaces. To reproduce at a laboratory scale mobile systems, robots are moving in an 100 square meters area, tracked by a precise positioning system. In this document we present the rational of such simulation solution, provide its complete description, and show how it can be used for evaluation by briefly explaining how to implement specific algorithms on the computers embedded by the robots. This work is an application of multi-robotics to research, presenting solutions to important problems of multi-robotics.

Keywords

Mobile Robot Mobile Node Mobility Pattern Mobile Platform Mobile System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aguayo, D., Bicket, J., Biswas, S., De Couto, D.: Mit roofnet: Construction of a production quality ad-hoc network. In: MobiCom Poster (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arlat, J., Kaâniche, M. (eds.): Hidenets. revised reference model. LAAS-CNRS, Contract Report nr. 07456 (September 2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hamida, E.B., Chelius, G., Gorce, J.-M.: Impact of the Physical Layer Modeling on the Accuracy and Scalability of Wireless Network Simulation. Simulation 85, 574–588 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beuran, R., Nguyen, L.T., Miyachi, T., Nakata, J.: Qomb: A wireless network emulation testbed. In: IEEE GLOBECOM 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cavin, D., Sasson, Y., Schiper, A.: On the accuracy of manet simulators. In: POMC 2002: Proc. of the second ACM International Workshop on Principles of Mobile Computing, pp. 38–43 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lan, K.C., Perera, E., Petander, H.: Mobnet: the design and implementation of a network mobility testbed for nemo protocol. In: 14th IEEE Workshop on Local and Metropolitan Area Netw. (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chin, K.-W., Judge, J., Williams, A., Kermode, R.: Implementation experience with manet routing protocols. ACM SIGCOMM Computer (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Correal, N.S., Kyperountas, S., Shi, Q., Welborn, M.: An uwb relative location system. In: Proc. of IEEE Conference on Ultra Wideband Systems and Technologies (November 2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hightower, J., Borriello, G.: A survey and taxonomy of location systems for ubiquitous computing. IEEE Computer (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson, D., Stack, T., Fish, R., Montrallo Flickinger, D., Stoller, L., Ricci, R., Lepreau, J.: Mobile emulab: a robotic wireless sensor network testbed. In: IEEE INFOCOM (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kiess, W., Mauve, M.: A survey on real-world implementations of mobile ad-hoc networks. Ad Hoc Networks (5), 324–339 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Killijian, M.O., Powell, D., Roy, M., Séverac, G.: Experimental evaluation of ubiquitous systems: Why and how to reduce wifi communication range. In: DEBS 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Killijian, M.O., Roy, M., Séverac, G., Zanon, C.: Data backup for mobile nodes: a cooperative middleware and experimentation platform. In: DSN 2009 WADS (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kropff, M., Krop, T., Hollick, M., Mogre, P.S., Steinmetz, R.: A survey on real world and emulation testbeds for mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proceedings of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructures for the Development of Networks and Communities, TRIDENTCOM 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Langendoen, K., Baggio, A., Visser, O.: Murphy loves potatoes: experiences from a pilot sensor network deployment in precision agriculture. In: International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, p. 155 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matthes, M., Biehl, H., Lauer, M., Drobnik, O.: Massive: An emulation environment for mobile ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services, WONS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitchell, C., Munishwar, V.P., Singh, S., Wang, X.: Testbed design and localization in mint-2: A miniaturized robotic platform for wireless protocol development and emulation. In: Proc. First International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks, COMSNETS (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Osterlind, F., Dunkels, A., Voigt, T.: Sensornet checkpointing: Enabling repeatability in testbeds and realism in simulations. Wireless Sensor Networks, 343–357 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pužar, M., Plagemann, T.: Neman: A network emulator for mobile ad-hoc networks. Technical Report 321, Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo (2005) ISBN 82-7368-274-9Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smith, A., Balakrishnan, H., Goraczko, M., Priyantha, N.B.: Tracking moving devices with the cricket location system. In: 2nd International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (Mobisys 2004), Boston, MA (June 2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stojmenovic, I.: Simulations in wireless sensor and ad hoc networks: matching and advancing models, metrics, and solutions. IEEE Communications Magazine 46(12), 102–107 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boleng, J., Camp, T., Davies, V.: A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Comm. and Mobile Computing 2, 483–502 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhou, J., Ji, Z., Bagrodia, R.: Twine: A hybrid emulation testbed for wireless networks and applications. In: IEEE INFOCOM 2006 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc-Olivier Killijian
    • 1
  • Matthieu Roy
    • 1
  • Gaetan Severac
    • 2
  1. 1.LAAS-CNRSToulouseFrance
  2. 2.ONERA (DCSD), The French Aerospace LabUniversite de ToulouseToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations