Advertisement

The Augmentation Concept: How to Make a Product “Active” during Its Life Cycle

Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 402)

Abstract

The recent developments in infotronics and communication allow the development of “intelligent” products. This chapter proposes the concept of “activeness” and a modelling approach to increase a system’s informational, communicational and decisional capacities in a distributed architecture. The “activeness” concept is then applied in two case studies. The first concerns the “product-driven” control of a real manufacturing cell. The second is related to the advanced diagnosis of complex systems in a railway application. Our results have allowed the origins of some of the defects to be found more easily and quickly than the traditional approaches.

Keywords

closed loop PLM intelligent product augmentation RFID 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bajic, E.: Ambient Networking for intelligent objects management, mobility and services. In: Seminar Institute For Manufacturing, IFM University of Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bangemann, T., Rebeuf, X., Reboul, D., Schulze, A., Szymanski, J., Thomesse, J.P., Thron, M., Zerhouni, N.: PROTEUS - Creating distributed maintenance systems through an integration platform. Computers in Industry 57, 539–551 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger, T., Sallez, Y., Valli, B., Gibaud, A., Trentesaux, D.: Semi-Heterarchical allocation and routing processes in FMS control: a stigmergic approach. J. Intell. Robot Syst. 58(1), 17–45 (2010)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dijkstra, E.W.: A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numer. Math. 1, 269–271 (1959)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    FING: Machine to Machine. White paper co-directed by Fing, Syntec Informatique et France Télécom, Paris (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jun, H.B., Kiritsis, D., Xirouchakis, P.: Research issues on closed-loop PLM. Computers in Industry 58(8-9), 855–868 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liao, L., Wang, H., Lee, J.: Reconfigurable Watchdog Agent® for machine health prognostics. International Journal of COMADEM (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindwer, M., Marculescu, D., Basten, T., Zimmermann, R., Marculescu, R., Jung, S., Cantatore, E.: Ambient intelligence visions and achievements: Linking abstract ideas to real-world concepts. In: Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference (DATE 2003), Munich (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mattern, F.: From smart devices to smart everyday object. In: SOC 2003 (Smart Objects Conference), Grenoble (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McFarlane, D., Sarma, S., Chirn, J.L., Wong, C.Y., Ashton, K.: The intelligent product in manufacturing control and management. In: 15th IFAC World Congress, Barcelona (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyer, G.G., Främling, K., Holmström, J.: Intelligent Products: A survey. Computers in Industry 60(3), 137–148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morel, G., Valckenaers, P., Faure, J.M., Pereira, C.E., Diedrich, C.: Manufacturing plant control challenges and issues. Control Eng. Pract. 15, 1321–1331 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Müller, A., Crespo Marquez, A., Iung, B.: On the concept of e-maintenance: Review and current research. Reliability Eng. Syst. Safe 93, 1165–1187 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orbita, B.T.: Data monitoring cuts rail running costs. Prof. Eng. 19(20), 50–53 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sallez, Y., Berger, T., Deneux, D., Trentesaux, D.: The lifecycle of active and intelligent products: The augmentation concept. International Journal of Comput. Integ. M 23(10), 905–924 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sethiya, S.K.: Condition Based Maintenance (CBM). Secy. to CME/WCR/JBP (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith, R.G.: The contract net protocol: High level communication and control in a distributed problem solver. IEEE T. Comput. 29(12), 1104–1113 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thurston, M.G.: An Open Standard for Web-Based Condition-Based Maintenance Systems. In: IEEE System Readiness Technology Conference-Autotestcon, Valley Forge (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trentesaux, D.: Distributed control of production systems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 22(7), 971–978 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vachtsevanos, G.J., Lewis, F.L.: Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for engineering systems. Wiley, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zbib, N., Pach, C., Sallez, Y., Trentesaux, D.: Heterarchical production control in manufacturing systems using the potential fields concept. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing (2012), doi:10.1007/s10845-010-0467-3Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zbib, N.: Allocation et routage dynamique dans un FMS basés sur le concept de champ de potential, PhD Thesis, University of Valenciennes (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Univ. Lille Nord de FranceLilleFrance
  2. 2.TEMPO Lab, “Production, Services, Information” TeamUVHCValenciennesFrance

Personalised recommendations