Abstract
Models formulated as complementarity problems have been applied previously to assess the potential for market power and costs of environmental regulation in transmission-constrained electricity markets. One emerging use of these models is to study the impacts of cap-and-trade (C&T) policies on electricity markets. In this chapter, we first summarize the theoretical background on the choice of environmental instruments to regulate emissions from the power sector. The chapter then presents a mathematical formulation of a power market that incorporates a carbon dioxide C&T program. We illustrate the capability of the model by presenting the results from two analyses. The first analysis examines the impact of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS) on the northwestern European electricity market. The second study investigates the energy and emissions implications of Maryland’s decision to join the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) by nesting a regional power sector model within a national model. In both cases, the larger firms in the electric market are modeled as Cournot oligopolists who pursue a quantity strategy while at the same time they act competitively in the C&T programs and transmission markets. We demonstrate how complementarity-based power market models can be easily modified to incorporate details of alternative policy designs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Aldy J, Krupnick A, Newell R, Parry I (2009) Designing climate mitigation policy. Technical report RFF DP 08-16, resources for the future, Washington
Bennear L, Stavins R (2007) Second-best theory and the use of multiple policy instruments. Environ Res Econ 37:111–129
Chen Y, Hobbs BF (2005) An oligopolistic power market model with tradable NOx permits. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20(1):119–129
Chen Y, Sijm J, Hobbs BF, Lise W (2008) Implications of CO2 emissions trading for short-run electricity market outcomes in northwest Europe. J Regul Econ 34(3):252–281
Dirkse SP, Ferris MC (1995) The PATH solver: a nonmonotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optim Method Softw 5(2):123–156
Fischer C, Springborn M (2009) Emissions targets and the real business cycle – intensity targets versus caps or taxes. Discussion paper RFF DP 09-47, resources for the future
Center for Integrative Environmental Research (2007) Economic and energy impacts from Maryland’s potential participation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative. A study commissioned by the Maryland Department of the Environment. Technical report, University of Maryland, College Park. http://cier.umd.edu/RGGI/documents/UMDRGGISTUDYFINAL.pdf
Goulder L, Parry I (2008) Instrument choice in environmental policy. Rev Environ Econ Policy 2(2):152–174
Gupta S, Tirpak A, Burger N, Gupta J, Höhne N, Boncheva A, Kanoan G, Kolstad C, Kruger J, Michaelowa A, Murase S, Pershing J, Saijo T, Sari A (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation, ConPanel on climate change. In: Climate change 2007: mitigation, contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hobbs BF (1995) Bottom-up analysis for utility decisions: company, state and regional models. In: Andrews CJ (ed) Regulating regional power systems. Quorum Books, Westport
Hobbs BF (2001) Linear complementarity models of Nash-Cournot competition in bilateral and Poolco power markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):194–202
Hobbs BF, Drayton G, Fisher EB, Lise W (2008) Improved transmission representations in oligopolistic market models: quadratic losses, phase shifters, and DC lines. IEEE Trans Power Syst 23(3):1018–1029
Hobbs BF, Rijkers FAM, Boots MG (2005) The more cooperation, the more competition? A Cournot analysis of the benefits of electric market coupling. Energy J 26(4):69–98
Hobbs BF, Rijkers FAM, Wals A (2004) Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system–part I: formulation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):707–717
Hobbs BF, Rijkers FAM, Wals A (2004) Strategic generation with conjectured transmission price responses in a mixed transmission pricing system–part II: application. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(2):872–879
Regional greenhouse gas initiative. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative model rule, final with corrections
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. States reach agreement on proposed rules for the nation’s first cap and trade program to address climate change
Lee CA The nation’s first GHG cap and trade program. Carbon finance North American workshop NYC
Lise W, Hobbs BF (2008) Market power in the European electricity market – the impacts of dry weather and additional transmission capacity. Energy Policy 36(4):1331–1343
Litz F (2010) Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative: lessons learned from the design of the nation’s first carbon cap-and-trade program. In: Presentation at California, climate change center, market advisory committee meeting, Sacramento
Mansur ET (1999) Pricing behavior in the initial summer of the restructured PJM wholesale electricity market. Working paper PWP-083, University of California, Berkeley Energy Institute
Metzler C, Hobbs B, Pang J-S (2003) Nash-Cournot equilibria in power markets on a linearized DC network with arbitrage: formulations and properties. Netw Spat Econ 3(2):123–150
Newell N, Stavins R (2003) Cost heterogeneity and the potential savings from market-based policies. J Reg Econ 23(1):43–59
Paul A, Burtraw D (2002) The RFF Haiku electricity market model. Technical report, Resources for the future. http://www.rff.org/Documents/RFF-RPT-haiku
PJM The PJM state of market (2006) Technical report, Pennsylvania-New Jersey-Maryland Interconnection. http://www.monitoringanalytics.com/reports/PJM_State_of_the_Market/2006.shtml
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Fourth RGGI auction yields 104.2 million for investment in the green economy
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative memorandum of understanding
Ruth M, Gabriel SA, Palmer KL, Burtraw D, Paul A, Chen Y, Hobbs BF, Irani D, Michael J, Ross KM, Conklin R, Miller J (2008) Economic and energy impacts from participation in the regional greenhouse gas initiative: a case study of the state of Maryland. Energy Policy 36(6):2279–2289
Scheepers MJJ, Rijkers FAM, Wals AF, Boots MG (2003) Verticale concentratie op de nederlandse elektriciteitsmarkt. ECN-CX–03-066 ECN-CX–03-066. Energy research centre of the Netherlands, Petten
Schweppe FC, Caramanis MC, Tabors RD, Bohn RE (1988) Spot pricing of electricity. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Sijm J, Hers JS, Lise W, Wetzelaer BJHW (2008) The impact of the EU ETS on electricity prices. final report to DG environment of the European commission. Technical report, Energy research centre of the Netherlands. http://www.ecn.nl/publications/default.aspx?nr%3DECN-E%2D08-007
Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Weber T, Neuhoff K (2009) Carbon markets and technological innovation. EPRG working paper no. 916. Electricity Policy Research Group, University of Cambridge
Weisbach D (2009) Instrument choice is instrument design. Technical report John M. Olin law and economics working paper no. 490, the law school, The University of Chicago
Weitzman M (1974) Prices versus quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41:457–491
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, Y., Lise, W., Sijm, J., Hobbs, B.F. (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading in the Electricity Sector: Model Formulation and Case Studies. In: Zheng, Q., Rebennack, S., Pardalos, P., Pereira, M., Iliadis, N. (eds) Handbook of CO₂ in Power Systems. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27431-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27431-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27430-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27431-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)