Study of a Titanium Dual-Mobility Socket with a Mean Follow-up of 18 Years
The concept of stainless steel dual-mobility cup in total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated a very low incidence of long-term instability and a 98% survival rate after 12 years. We systematically implanted titanium alloy dual-mobility acetabular cups during a 5-year period. The purpose of our retrospective study was to report the 18-year clinical results of a homogeneous and continuous series of 103 primary total hip replacements after implantation of a cementless titanium dual-mobility cup. The overall 18-year survival rate of the acetabular cup with a 95% confidence interval was 87.4%. At last follow-up, there was no evidence of implant instability. However, aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was reported in one case and high wear of the retentive liner in nine. The results of this investigation confirmed the long-term stability of dual-mobility implants. The main limitation of this system was early wear of the polyethylene liner in contact with the titanium metal back and third-body reaction associated with loss of the PE liner retentive rim. In our study, titanium demonstrated poor tribological characteristics.
KeywordsAseptic Loosening Acetabular Component Radiolucent Line Polyethylene Liner Dual Mobility
- 2.Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M (2003) A ten to 15 year follow up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85-B:1207–1211Google Scholar
- 4.Bousquet G, Gazielly D, Girardin P, Debiesse JL, Relave M, Israelia A (1985) The ceramic coated cementless total hip arthroplasty. Basic concepts and surgical technique. J Orthop Surg 1:15–28Google Scholar
- 5.Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Rileyl H (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55-A:1629–1632Google Scholar
- 6.Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS (1979) Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61-A:15–23Google Scholar