Advertisement

The Spectrum of Polytrauma. A Pragmatic Approach for the Musculo-Skeletal Surgeon

  • Pierre Hoffmeyer
  • Robin Peter
Chapter
Part of the European Instructional Lectures book series (EICL, volume 12)

Abstract

Polytrauma is one of the leading causes of death and disability in the young and, more recently, also in the elderly. Although much progress in prevention has occurred over the years, especially with regard to road traffic safety, polytrauma remains a devastating occurrence that permanently affects the lives of many victims. A better evaluation of the patients, recognizing their individual needs, has improved the care and the outcome of polytrauma victims. Accurate clinical evaluation along with appropriate laboratory testing and state-of-the-art imaging has significantly advanced the understanding of the patient’s condition. Management strategies have become more flexible and tailored to the injured person’s needs. There is a clear consensus that pelvic, articular and long bone fractures must be fixed. The condition of the patient and more specifically of the pelvis (stable or unstable) will orient the resuscitation and surgical teams towards either an Early Total Care approach or a Damage Control plan.

Keywords

Injury Severity Score Pelvic Fracture Pelvic Ring Articular Fracture Definitive Fixation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Assal M, Ray A, Stern R (2007) The extensile approach for the operative treatment of high-energy pilon fractures: surgical technique and soft-tissue healing. J Orthop Trauma 21(3):198–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W et al (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baranyi A, Leithgöb O, Kreiner B et al (2010) Relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder, quality of life, social support, and affective and dissociative status in severely injured accident victims 12 months after trauma. Psychosomatics 51(3):237–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bédat B, Otten P, Peter R (1998) Fractures of the sacrum and neurologic lesions. A propos of a case. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84(3):281–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    bfu – Swiss Council for Accident Prevention (2010) STATUS 2010: statistics on non-occupational accidents and the level of safety in Switzerland, road traffic, sports, home and leisure. Berne (www.bfu.ch)
  6. 6.
    Bone LB, Giannoudis P (2011) Femoral shaft fracture fixation and chest injury after polytrauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(3):311–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burgess AR, Eastridge BJ, Young JW et al (1990) Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. J Trauma 30(7):848–856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burlew CC, Moore EE (2011) Abdominal injuries: indications for surgery. In: Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli J (eds) The polytraumatized patient with ­fractures. A multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Heidelberg, Berlin, pp 89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandra S, Kashyap R, Trillo-Alvarez CA et al (2011) Mapping physicians’ admission diagnoses to structured concepts towards fully automatic calculation of acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score. BMJ Open 1(2):e000216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen L, Zhang G, Wu Y, Guo X, Yuan W (2011) Percutaneous limited internal fixation combined with external fixation to treat open pelvic fractures concomitant with perineal lacerations. Orthopedics 34(12):e827–e831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cotton BA, McCarthy JJ, Holcomb JB (2011) Acutely injured patients on dabigatran. N Engl J Med 365(21):2039–2040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Court-Brown CM, Clement N (2011) The management of the multiply injured elderly patient. In: Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli J (eds) The polytraumatized patient with fractures. A multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Desai D, March R, Watters JM (1989) Hyperglycemia after trauma increases with age. J Trauma 29:719–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Egol KA, Tejwani NC, Capla EL et al (2005) Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (OTA types 41): the results of a prospective, standardized protocol. J Orthop Trauma 19:448–455, discussion 56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Flierl MA, Beauchamp KM, Stahel PF (2011) Head injuries: neurosurgical and orthopaedic strategies. In: Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli J (eds) The polytraumatized patient with fractures. A multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganz R, Krushell RJ, Jakob RP et al (1991) The ­antishock pelvic clamp. Clin Orthop Relat Res 267:71–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giannoudis PV, Harwood PJ, Court-Brown C et al (2009) Severe and multiple trauma in older patients; incidence and mortality. Injury 40(4):362–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gross T, Amsler F (2011) Prevalence and incidence of longer term pain in survivors of polytrauma. Surgery 150(5):985–995PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, Probst C et al (2006) The risk of local infective complications after damage control procedures for femoral shaft fracture. J Orthop Trauma 20(3):181–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Harwood PJ, Giannoudis PV, Probst C et al (2006) Polytrauma study group of the German Trauma Society. Which AIS based scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic blunt trauma patients? J Trauma 60(2):334–340PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hoffmann M, Lefering R, Gruber-Rathmann et al. Trauma Registry of the German Society for Trauma Surgery (2012) The impact of BMI on polytrauma outcome. Injury 43(2):184–188 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoffmeyer P, Seigne JM, Garcia J et al (1984) The value of computerized tomography in fractures of the pelvic ring. Int Orthop 8(1):1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Karadimas EJ, Nicolson T, Kakagia DD (2011) Angiographic embolisation of pelvic ring injuries. Treatment algorithm and review of the literature. Int Orthop 35(9):1381–1390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keel M, Trentz O (2005) Pathophysiology of polytrauma. Injury 36(6):691–709PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Köhler D, Pohlemann T (2011) Operative treatment of the peripelvic Morel-Lavallée lesion. Oper Orthop Traumatol 23(1):15–20Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lavoie A, Moore L, LeSage N et al (2005) The injury severity score or the new injury severity score for predicting intensive care unit admission and hospital length of stay? Injury 36(4):477–483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mommsen P, Frink M, Pape HC et al (2009) Elevated systemic IL-18 and neopterin levels are associated with posttraumatic complications among patients with multiple injuries: a prospective cohort study. Injury 40(5):528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mommsen P, Krettek C, Hildebrand F (2011) Chest trauma: classification and influence on the general management. In: Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli J (eds) The polytraumatized patient with fractures. A multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 75–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mulhall KJ, Ahmed A, Khan Y et al (2002) Simultaneous hip and upper limb fracture in the elderly: incidence, features and management considerations. Injury 33:29–31, Int J Care InjuredPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nast-Kolb D, Waydhas C, Gippner-Steppert C et al (1997) Indicators of the posttraumatic inflammatory response correlate with organ failure in patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 42(3):446–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Paladino L, Subramanian RA, Nabors S et al (2010) Triage hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator of major trauma. J Trauma 69(1):41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Papakostidis C, Giannoudis PV (2009) Pelvic ring injuries with haemodynamic instability: efficacy of pelvic packing, a systematic review. Injury 40(Suppl 4):S53–S61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pape HC, Rixen D, Morley J et al (2007) Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients). Ann Surg 246(3):491–499; discussion 499–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ricci WM, Mamczak C, Tynan M et al (2010) Pelvic inlet and outlet radiographs redefined. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(10):1947–1953PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roberts CS, Pape HC, Jones AL et al (2005) Damage control orthopaedics: evolving concepts in the treatment of patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma. Instr Course Lect 54:447–462PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sadri H, Nguyen-Tang T, Stern R et al (2005) Control of severe hemorrhage using C-clamp and arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic ring disruption. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125(7):443–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Singh J, Gupta G, Garg R et al (2011) Evaluation of trauma and prediction of outcome using TRISS method. J Emerg Trauma Shock 4(4):446–449PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Starks I, Frost A, Wall P, Lim J (2011) Is a fracture of the transverse process of L5 a predictor of pelvic fracture instability? J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(7):967–969PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tile M (ed) (1995) Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum, 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tosounidis T, Giannoudis PV (2011) Pathophysiology of polytrauma. In: Pape HC, Sanders R, Borrelli J (eds) The polytraumatized patient with fractures. A multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vandromme MJ, Griffin RL, Weinberg JA et al (2010) Lactate is a better predictor than systolic blood pressure for determining blood requirement and mortality: could prehospital measures improve trauma triage? J Am Coll Surg 210(5):861–867, 867–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vermeulen B, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P et al (1999) Prehospital stabilization of pelvic dislocations: a new strap belt to provide temporary hemodynamic stabilization. Swiss Surg 5(2):43–46PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wanner GA, Keel M, Steckholzer U et al (2000) Relationship between procalcitonin plasma levels and severity of injury, sepsis, organ failure, and mortality in injured patients. Crit Care Med 28(4):950–957PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Weider L, Hughes K, Ciarochi J et al (1999) Early versus delayed repair of facial fractures in the multiply injured patient. Am Surg 65(8):790–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    WHO (2009) Global status report on road safety: time for action. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yendamuri S, Fulda GJ, Tinkoff GH (2003) Admission hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator in trauma. J Trauma 55:33–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© EFORT 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Geneva University Hospitals, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations