Advertisement

Daily Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Based on Least Squares Support Vector Machines

  • Dachun Chen
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 369)

Abstract

As a key hydrological parameter, daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) determines the accuracy of the hydrological number of the crop, and, consequently, the regional optimization disposition of water resources. At present, the main methods for ETo estimation are the Penman-Monteith (PM) equation and its modified formula, both of which are based on climatic factors such as temperature, radiation, humidity, and wind velocity, among others. Unfortunately, these required data are not always available in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region, China, which is a semiarid area. Hence, this paper puts forward, for the first time, a least squares support vector machine (LSSVM) model for estimating ETo. The LSSVM model used in this study considers climatic factors as input variables and the ETo calculated by the Penman-Monteith equation as an output variable. Compared with the artificial neural network (ANN) model, which was developed with the same data, LSSVM prediction shows higher accuracy, efficiency, and generalization performance. Therefore, it can be used as a complementary ETo estimation method.

Keywords

Daily reference evapotranspiration LSSVM ANN Semiarid area Xinjiang 

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D., Smith, M.: Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In: Proceedings of the Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Food and Agricultural Organization, United Nations, Rome (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, M., Raghuwanshi, N.S., Singh, R., et al.: Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 128, 224–233 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trajkovic, S., Todorovic, B., Stankovic, M.: Forecasting of reference evapotranspiration by artificial neural networks. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 129, 454–457 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Odhiambo, L.O., Yoder, R.E., Yoder, D.C., et al.: Optimization of fuzzy evapotranspiration model through neural training with input-output examples. Trans. ASAE American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 44, 1625–1633 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aksoy, H., Guven, A., Aytek, A., et al.: Discussion of Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 52, 825–831 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kişi, O.: Generalized regression neural networks for evapotranspiration modeling. Hydrological Sciences Journal 51, 1092–1104 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kişi, O., Ozturk, O.: Adaptive Neurofuzzy Computing Technique for Evapotranspiration Estimation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 133, 368–379 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gorka, L., Amaia, O.B., Jose, J.L.: Comparison of artificial neural network models and empirical and semi-empirical equations for daily reference evapotranspiration estimation in the Basque Country (Northern Spain). Agricultural Water Management 95, 553–565 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ali, R.K.: Comparative study of Hargreaves’s and artificial neural network’s methodologies in estimating reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid environment. Irrigation Science 26, 253–259 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sungwon, K., Hung, S.K.: Neural networks and genetic algorithm approach for nonlinear evaporation and evapotranspiration modeling. Journal of Hydrology 351, 299–317 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Y.-M., Seydou, T., Tienfuan, K.: Neural network approach for estimating reference evapotranspiration from limited climatic data in Burkina Faso. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 7, 704–713 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seydou, T., Wang, Y.-M., Tienfuan, K.: Artificial neural network for modeling reference evapotranspiration complex process in Sudano-Sahelian zone. Agricultural Water Management 97, 707–714 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eslamian, S.S., Abedi-Koupai, J., Amiri, M.J., et al.: Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration using support vector machines and artificial neural networks in greenhouse. Res. J. Env. Sci. 3, 439–447 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kisi, O., Cimen, M.: Evapotranspiration modelling using support vector machines. Hydrological Sciences Journal 54, 918–928 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning. Springer, Berlin (1995)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suykens, J.A.K., Vandewale, J.: Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Processing Letters 9, 293–300 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dachun Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering CollegeHehai UniversityNanjingP.R. China
  2. 2.Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering CollegeXinjiang Agricultural UniversityUrumqiP.R. China

Personalised recommendations