Skip to main content

A Service Quality Model for the Public Information Service

  • Conference paper
U- and E-Service, Science and Technology (UNESST 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 264))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a 22-items instrument for assessing customer perceptions of service quality about public information service. Responses from 702 users were obtained in four public information service. Through an evidence of the scale’s reliability, factor structure, and validity on the basis of analyzing data from four samples, this study found out there is no problem in measuring the quality of service with the proposed factors and indices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research 3(1) (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  2. DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zeithaml, V.A.: Defining and Relating Price, Perceived Quality, and Perceived Value. Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Garvin, D.A.: Quality on the Line. Harvard Business Review 61, 65–73 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1) (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Seddon, P.B.: A Respecification and Extension of DeLone and McLean Model of IS Success. Information Systems Research 8(3) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harman, H.H.: Modern Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Campbell, D.T.: Recommendations for APA Test Standards Regarding Construct, Trait, or Discriminant Validity. American Psychologist 15 (August 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter, J.P.: Construct Validity: A Review of Basic Issues and Marketing Practices. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (May 1981)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Churchill Jr., G.A.: A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February 1979)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jo, HW., Kim, SW. (2011). A Service Quality Model for the Public Information Service. In: Kim, Th., et al. U- and E-Service, Science and Technology. UNESST 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 264. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27210-3_44

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27209-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27210-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics