Advertisement

Hegemonic Power and Technology Advancement

  • O. F. Bahrisch
  • Jin-Suk Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 261)

Abstract

During the past 600 years the world has seen changing hegemonic powers, situations in which one country dominates the world economically, intellectually and militarily. Since 1945 this attribution is undoubtedly true for the USA.

A hegemonic change always occurred after a period of global war. Is the current ‘global war of terror’ such a global war that might cause a new hegemon to emerge?

This paper summarizes the existing literature on the debate over the emergence of a new hegemon and analyses two possible scenarios a) the USA stay the dominating power, b) a new hegemon arises and one of the aspirants of the hegemonic throne, take over the leadership position.

Keywords

Public Debt Technology Advancement Military Spending Defense Spending Core Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cipolla, C.M.: The economic decline of empires. Methuen, London (1970)Google Scholar
  2. Clark, I.A.N.: China and the United States: a succession of hegemonies? International Affairs 87(1), 13–28 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ferguson, N.: Complexity and Collapse - Empires on the Edge of Chaos. Foreign Affairs (89), 18–32 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. Gauger, A.J.: U.S. Business must Revolutionize, vol. 43. Omaha World-Herald, Omaha (1986)Google Scholar
  5. Gilpin, R.: U.S. power and the multinational corporation: the political economy of foreign direct investment. Basic Books, New York (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilpin, R.: War and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, New York (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gilpin, R.: The Theory of Hegemonic War. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18(4), 591–613 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Huntington, S.P.: The Lonely Superpower. Foreign Affairs 78(2), 35–49 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kennedy, P.: The Greatest Superpower ever. New Perspectives Quarterly 19(3 (Winter)), 8–18 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kindleberger, C.P.: Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides. International Studies Quarterly 25(2), 242–254 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kindleberger, C.P.: The world in depression, pp. 1929–1939. (Rev. and enl. ed.)University of California Press, Berkeley (1986)Google Scholar
  12. Kondratieff, N.D., Stolper, W.F.: The Long Waves in Economic Life. The Review of Economics and Statistics 17(6), 105–115 (1935)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kugler, J., Organski, A.F.K.: The power transition: A retrospective and prospective evaluation. In: Midlarsky, M.I. (ed.) Handbook of war studies, pp. 171–194. Unwin Hyman, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  14. Layne, C.: China’s Challenge to US Hegemony. Current History 107(705), 13–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. Machiavelli, N.: The Prince (G. Bull, Trans.). Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1961)Google Scholar
  16. Mahan, A.T.: The influence of sea power upon history, pp. 1660–1783. Barnes & Noble Books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  17. McCormick, T.J.: World Systems. The Journal of American History 77(1), 125–132 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Modelski, G.: Long cycles in world politics. University of Washington Press, Seattle (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Modelski, G., Morgan, P.M.: Understanding Global War. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 29(3), 391–417 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Modelski, G., Thompson, W.R.: Long Cycles and Global War. In: Midlarsky, M.I. (ed.) Handbook of war studies, pp. 23–54. Unwin Hyman, Boston (1989)Google Scholar
  21. Morgenthau, H.J.: Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, 5th edn. Knopf, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  22. Morris, E.: The rise of Theodore Roosevelt. Random House, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  23. Organski, A.F.K.: World politics. Knopf, New York (1958)Google Scholar
  24. Rasler, K.A., Thompson, W.R.: Global Wars, Public Debts, and the Long Cycle. World Politics 35(4), 489–516 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reinhart, C., Rogoff, K.: Dept and Growth Revisited. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Munich (2010)Google Scholar
  26. Rosecrance, R.: Long Cycle Theory and International Relations. International Organization 41(2), 283–301 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schwartz, H.M.: States versus markets: history, geography, and the development of the international political economy. St. Martin’s Press, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thompson, W.R., Zuk, L.G.: War, Inflation, and the Kondratieff Long Wave. Journal of Conflict Resolution 26(4), 621–644 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tkacik, J.J.: A Chinese Military Superpower? The Heritage Foundation. Asian Studies Center, The Heritage Foundation, Washington (2007)Google Scholar
  30. Wallerstein, I.: Kondratieff up or Kondratieff Down? Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 2(4), 663–673 (1979)Google Scholar
  31. Wallerstein, I.: The West, Capitalism, and the Modern World-System. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 15(4), 561–619 (1992)Google Scholar
  32. Wallerstein, I.: The Rise and Future Demise of World-Systems Analysis. Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 21(1), 103–112 (1998)Google Scholar
  33. Webb, M.C., Krasner, S.D.: Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment. Review of International Studies 15(2), 183–198 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. F. Bahrisch
    • 1
  • Jin-Suk Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International ManagementNamseoul UniversityKorea

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper

Buy options